Skip to main content
. 2005 May;43(5):2188–2193. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2188-2193.2005

TABLE 1.

Results of applying the three-stage method to 480 cases of corrected reportsa

Method description No. of cases (%) ruled out for adverse impact No. of cases (%) remaining
Stage 1: rapid review of corrected report 301 (62.7) 179 (37.3)
Stage 2: medical record review 25 (5.2) 154 (32.1)
Stage 3: clinician interview(s) 122 (25.4)b 32 (6.7)
a

The three-stage method yielded 32 cases (6.7%) that involved adverse clinical impact.

b

These 122 cases included 4 cases in which information could not be obtained from the clinician.