Skip to main content
. 2005 May;43(5):2277–2285. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2277-2285.2005

TABLE 2.

Analytical sensitivities, specificities, and predictive values of IgM detection in relation to PCR resultsa

Assay No. (%) of serum specimens
PPV (%) NPV (%) % Agreement
Case sera testing positive (n = 31)b Control sera testing negative (n = 96)
AniLabsystems 24 (77) 88 (92) 24/32 (75) 88/95 (93) 88.1
Biotest 16 (52) 91 (95) 16/21 (73) 91/106 (86) 84.3
CFT 20 (65) 93 (97) 20/23 (87) 93/104 (89) 89.0
Diagnosys 18 (58) 90 (94) 18/24 (75) 90/103 (87) 85.0
ImmunoCard 12 (48)c 76 (79) 12/32 (38) 76/89 (85) 72.7
ImmunoWell 11 (35) 92 (96) 11/15 (73) 92/112 (82) 81.1
Novum 22 (71) 47 (49) 22/71 (31) 47/56 (84) 54.3
Platelia 16 (52) 94 (98) 16/18 (89) 94/109 (86) 86.6
Ridascreen 11 (35) 96 (100) 11/11 (100) 96/116 (83) 84.3
Serion classic 15 (48) 91 (95) 15/20 (75) 91/107 (86) 83.5
SeroMP 22 (71) 84 (88) 22/34 (65) 84/93 (92) 83.5
SerodiaMycoII 20 (65) 84 (88) 20/32 (63) 84/95 (88) 81.9
Virotech 14 (45) 92 (96) 14/18 (78) 92/109 (84) 83.5
a

Equivocal results were considered negative.

b

More than 6 days after disease onset.

c

n = 25.