Abstract
In recent years, there have been significant breakthroughs in the identification of immunological components of skin diseases and in the development of immunomodulatory drugs. Novel therapies create exciting prospects for personalized care. This article provides an overview of the role played by Th1, Th2, Th17, and follicular Th pathways in the most common skin diseases. Additionally, it elucidates the impact of current and upcoming treatments on each of these signaling cascades. Skin diseases predominantly influenced by a single dominant Th pathway such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis are well-suited for biologics. However, in many other disorders a complex interplay between different immune pathways exists. This can lead to inconsistent efficacy of biologics based on individual patient profiles. In case of activation of several Th pathways, it may be more suitable to consider conventional therapies or JAK inhibitors. Increasing immunological insights have transitioned from laboratory research to practical applications, a trend that is expected to continue growing in the future.
Keywords: Helper T cell, Alopecia areata, Vitiligo, Atopic dermatitis, Psoriasis
INTRODUCTION
A large part of skin diseases is immune-mediated and affects millions of people worldwide. The broad diversity of immunological reactions in the skin leads to an impressive variety in disease presentations (1). It is important to take the pathophysiology of the different skin disorders into account when selecting immunomodulating or immunosuppressive treatments. In recent years, the therapeutic arsenal has become increasingly targeted by the inhibition of specific parts of the immune system. However, while some skin diseases can be directly linked to the activation of a specific Th pathway, in other skin disorders multiple Th lineages are simultaneously activated (2). This highlights the need to understand the immunological balance in different skin diseases to optimize the therapeutic approach (3).
In this review, we summarize the involvement of the different Th cell pathways for the most common inflammatory skin disorders. Additionally, we clarify how immunomodulating treatments for skin diseases affect these Th pathways.
Th1 PATHWAY
The Th1 response leads to the attack and destruction of other skin cells. This represents the immune response needed to clear intracellular pathogens (e.g., viral infections) or tumoral cells. However, in case the Th1 response is overactive, normal skin cells can become targets for destruction (4,5). Typical examples are vitiligo and alopecia areata. Th1 lymphocytes differentiate from naive T cells under the influence of IL-12, IFN-γ, and to a lesser extent IL-27 (Fig. 1). In contrast, IL-4, IL-10, and TGF-β limit the conversion of naive T cells to the Th1 lineage (6). Th1 lymphocytes produce IFN-γ and TNF-α. IFN-γ activates both adaptive and innate immune cells such as cytotoxic T cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, NK-cells and innate lymphoid cells. It plays a crucial part in antiviral protection and is capable to directly inhibit viral replication (7). IFN-γ is induced by other cytokines such as IL-12, IL-15, IL-18, IFN-α, and IFN-β (8).
Figure 1. Differentiation of naive T cells into Th1, Th2, Th17, and Tfh cells.
IL-2 is produced by Th1 cells and stimulates the proliferation of T- and B-lymphocytes. This is important for the clonal expansion of T lymphocytes reacting against specific Ags. Along with IL-15, IL-2 governs the life and death of lymphocytes (9). IL-2 ensures a sufficient number of specific T lymphocytes is produced to mount an effective targeted immune response. Importantly, IL-2 is responsible for the development of IFN-γ producing resident memory T cells which reside in the skin for long periods (10). While high levels of IL-2 induce inflammation, low IL-2 levels dampen immune activation by maintaining the fitness of regulatory T cells and eliminating self-reactive T cells by activation-induced cell death (10,11). IL-15 maintains IFN-γ producing tissue resident memory T cell responses and NK cells against invading pathogens (11).
Th2 PATHWAY
The original function of the Th2 pathway was to eradicate our skin from parasites (12). This is accomplished by producing cytokines that induce itch including IL-4, IL-13, and IL-31. Additionally, the skin barrier is impaired by these cytokines allowing for the decreased adherence of parasites in the epidermis and faster removal by friction or scratching. IL-4 and IL-5 downregulate filaggrin and are therefore directly responsible for the decreased cell-cell adherence of keratinocytes leading to spongiosis and an impaired skin barrier (13). IL-4 is the main cytokine stimulating the development of Th2 lymphocytes although IL-6, IL-10, IL-17E (=IL-25), and IL-33 are costimulatory in contrast to IL-13 (Fig. 1). When compared to IL-4, IL-13 is more prevalent in the skin of lesional atopic dermatitis (AD) (14). TGF-β inhibits the conversion of naive T cells into Th2 lymphocytes (15). As parasite elimination has become mostly redundant in developed countries, inhibition of this pathway is in generally considered safe and does not lead to an immunosuppressed state. Both IL-4 and IL-13 act on sensory neurons increasing itch signaling and induce IgE production by plasma cells. Additionally, both cytokines regulate mast cells (MCs) and can contribute to skin fibrosis (16). Besides IL-4 and IL-13, Th2 cells also produce IL-5 which is the key cytokine stimulating the development and maintenance of eosinophils. Other Th2 cytokines include IL-3, IL-9. While AD is the archetypical example, other skin disorders carry also a partial Th2 signature mostly when pruritus and/or skin fibrosis is present or in case of eosinophilia (17).
Th17 PATHWAY
The primary function of the Th17 pathway is to protect outside tissues such as the skin, the pulmonary system and mucosae against extracellular pathogens (18). The defense involves thickening the epidermal layer leading to acanthosis and hyperkeratosis and purulent inflammations resulting in pustules. The strongest cytokine of the Th17 family includes IL-17A, with IL-17F displaying similar but less potent capabilities (Fig. 2). The main function of these cytokines is to ensure protection against fungal and yeast (especially candida) infections. IL-17A plays a crucial part in regulating occludin, Reg3g, and mucin 1 preserving the integrity of the bowel mucosa while IL-17F does not (19). IL-17F has a 50% homology with IL-17A, while this is only 27% and 16% for IL-17C and IL-17E (=IL-25), respectively (20,21). The different cytokines of the IL-17 family are highly synergetic with each other but also with TNF-α, IL-22, and IL-1β (22).
Figure 2. This image illustrates the differentiation and function of four T cell subsets: Th1, Th2, Th17, and Tfh, showcasing their respective signaling pathways, master transcription factors, and cytokine expression. Th1 cells are depicted with IL-12R and IFN-γ receptor activation leading to TNF-α and IFN-γ expression. Th2 cells show IL-2 and IL-4 receptor signaling activating GATA3 for IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, and IL-13 expression. Th17 cells highlight IL-6, IL-23, and TGF-β signaling to RoRyt for IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-22 expression. Tfh cells display IL-12, IL-23, TGF-β, and activin receptor signaling to Bcl6, promoting IL-21 production and B cell co-stimulation. Inhibitors targeting specific pathways in each subset are also depicted.
SMAD, suppressor of mothers against decapentaplegic; Roryt, retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor gamma t; GATA3, GATA binding protein 3; Bcl6, B-cell lymphoma 6.
IL-17 mediated skin disorders are characterized by hyperkeratosis and/or pustular inflammation. The most recognized examples are psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, and pityriasis rubra pilaris (22). IL-17A is directly linked to the inflammatory signs including erythema and pustules. IL-17E induces proliferation of keratinocytes resulting in hyperkeratosis (23). IL-23 is the central cytokine in the late differentiation and maintenance of Th17 lymphocytes. IL-6, IL-21, IL-22, and TGF-β are additional stimulatory factors of Th17 differentiation, while IL-4 has an inhibitive effect (24).
CYTOKINES AT THE CROSSROADS BETWEEN THE Th17 AND Th2 PATHWAY
IL-17C and IL-17E work at the crossroads of the Th17 and Th2 pathway and can be elevated in disorders affecting both pathways. In contrast to IL-17A and F which are primarily produced by immune cells such as Th17 cells, IL-17C is released by keratinocytes (25). Nonetheless, IL-17C exerts a similar pro-inflammatory and antibacterial function and results in a psoriasiform inflammatory response. Besides psoriasis, IL-17C is increased as a non-essential cytokine in atopic and contact dermatitis. It is involved in psoriasiform skin lesions in inflammatory bowel disease under anti-TNF-α treatment and in recurrent aphthous ulcers. IL-17E was originally described as a Th2 cytokine (26). Mice infused with IL-17E develop a Th2 profile with increased IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, serum IgE and blood eosinophilia. Its role in psoriasis is therefore controversial and may be linked to specific phenotypes such as erythroderma and scalp psoriasis (27).
FOLLICULAR Th CELLS (Tfh)
Tfh are specialized CD4 cells located in the lymph nodes, tonsils, and spleen. They play a critical role in assisting B lymphocytes to produce Abs. Nonetheless, T cells bearing features of Tfh can be found in the circulation, especially in patients with autoimmune disorders (28). In the skin, Ab-mediated diseases are tightly linked with blistering disorders. The deposition of Abs in the epidermal layer can cause inflammation leading to the splitting of the skin and formation of bullae. Tfh produce IL-21, although cytokines of Th1/Th2/Th17 cells are released including IL-4, IL-6, IL-17, and IFN-γ which has led to the classification of Tfh1, Tfh2, and Tfh17 cells (29). Bullous skin disorders exhibit besides evidence of Tfh activation frequently various degrees of Th1, Th2, and/or Th17 cytokines.
SKIN DISEASES ACCORDING TO Th1/Th2/Th17/Tfh SIGNALING
Predominant Th1
In both vitiligo and alopecia areata, IFN-γ levels are increased and IFN-γ induced chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 play a crucial role (Table 1) (30,31). Mice models have clearly shown the central role of IFN-γ in the pathogenesis of both vitiligo and alopecia areata (5,32). The soluble IL-2 receptor is high in both disorders and associated with disease activity (33,34). Similarly, several studies found elevated IL-15 and IFN-α levels in vitiligo and alopecia areata. JAK inhibitors offer high efficacy in both conditions further confirming Th1 signaling as the most promising treatment target (35). Increased IL-17 levels have been reported although a link with disease activity is less clear and inhibition of IL-17 is in both conditions not beneficial (36). The Th2 axis has been suggested to play a role in alopecia areata, especially in a subgroup with high IgE levels where IL-4R inhibition can be considered as a therapeutic option (37).
Table 1. The involvement of the Th pathways in different skin diseases.
| Skin disease | Th1 | Th2 | Th17 | Tfh | Innate immunity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acne | + | / | +++ | / | +++ |
| Atopic dermatitis | + | ++++ | / | ++ | ++ |
| Alopecia areata | ++++ | ++ | + | ? | ++ |
| Bullous pemphigoid | / | +++ | + | ++++ | ++ |
| Dermatomyositis | +++ | +++ | ++ | + | ++ |
| Eosinophilic fasciitis | ++ | +++ | ++ | / | +++ |
| Graft-versus-host disease | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + |
| Granuloma annulare | ++ | ++ | / | / | +++ |
| Hidradenitis suppurativa | + | / | +++ | / | +++ |
| Lichen planopilaris | +++ | + | / | / | / |
| Lichen planus | +++ | + | ++ | ++ | + |
| Lichen sclerosus | +++ | + | / | / | / |
| Lupus | +++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ |
| Morphea | ++ | +++ | + | + | + |
| Pemphigus | + | + | + | ++ | + |
| Prurigo nodularis | + | +++ | ++ | / | + |
| Pyoderma gangrenosum | +++ | / | ++ | / | +++ |
| Rosacea | ++ | / | ++ | / | ++ |
| Psoriasis | ++ | / | ++++ | / | +++ |
| Sarcoidosis | +++ | / | ++ | / | ++ |
| Vasculitis | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | +++ |
| Urticaria | + | ++ | + | +++ | +++ |
| Vitiligo | ++++ | / | + | + | ++ |
Pathway increased: ++++, very strong; +++, strong; ++, moderate; +, limited; /, no; ?, unknown.
Lichenoid inflammations such as lichen planus, lichen sclerosus and lichen planopilaris all present with a strong Th1 response. Th1 cytokines IFN-γ, TNFα, IL-2, and Th17 cytokines (IL-17, IL-22) are linked to lichen planus. Diseases with interface dermatitis, indicating an immune-mediated loss of keratinocytes, are typically associated with a strong Th1 response (38). Nonetheless, an important role of the Th17 pathway has been shown in lichen planus by cases with improvement to ustekinumab and guselkumab (39). Tfh cells are also active with high IL-21 levels which may be of particular importance in bullous and mucosal lichen planus (40,41). Some studies point to the Th2 cytokine IL-4 in oral lichen planus (42). In lichen sclerosus, Th1 and Th2 signals are pronounced with inhibition of Th17 (43,44). Despite a strong IFN-γ response in lichen sclerosus, cases have been published showing improvement when targeting the Th2 pathway with dupilumab. It is believed that Th1 inflammation is the primary acute inflammation followed by Th2 signaling resulting in fibrosis (45).
Lupus has a complex inflammatory response with Th1 and Th17 cytokines and some Th2 activation despite low levels of IL-2, IL-4, and TGF-β1 (46). Tfh are associated with disease activity and autoantibody production (47). Dermatomyositis which presents similar to lichen planus, and lupus with interface dermatitis produces Th1 cytokines including IFN-γ and TNF-α. However, the Th2 pathway is also activated with IL-4 release (48). Additionally, Il-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β are increased (49).
A skewed Th1 cytokine profile is found in sarcoidosis with low levels of Th2 related factors. Th17 lymphocytes seem present although this mainly concerns a special subset of Th17 lymphocytes that has acquired the capacity to produce IFN-γ (=Th17.1 lymphocytes) (50,51,52).
A strong innate immune response with neutrophils can be found in pyoderma gangrenosum which is also characterized by a shifted Th1/Th2 and Th17/Th2 balance in favor of Th1 and Th17 (53). Proneutrophilic markers including IL-8, and TNFα are strongly increased together with neutrophil attracting chemokines CXCL1/2/3, CXCL16 and RANTES illustrating the more innate immune nature of pyoderma gangrenosum (54).
Granuloma annulare displays Th1 cytokines including TNFα, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-12, and Th2 cytokines. A surprising high level of IL-4 was detected. Th17 and Th22 signals are also upregulated (55). Different types of biologics have been proven to improve granuloma annulare including anti-TNFα, anti-IL12/23 and anti-IL4/13 (56). Granuloma annulare is likely a heterogeneous condition with several patient-dependent immune pathways and a strong contribution of the innate immune cells such as macrophages.
Predominant Th2
AD is characterized by a strong Th2 response, linked with increased IL-13, IL-4, and IL-5 levels. IL-31 is produced by Th2 cells and increased in AD contributing to the intense pruritus associated with AD (57). Th17 and Th22 cells are involved in acute AD, while chronic AD is characterized by recruitment of Th1 lymphocytes leading to a mixed immune cell infiltrate (58). Racial differences further complicate the picture with Asian AD phenotypes exhibiting higher Th17 activation (59). The immune response in allergic contact dermatitis depends on the allergen with differential activation of Th2, Th1, and/or Th17 axes (60). Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is less Th2-skewed with an innate immune activation due to toxic effects on keratinocytes. ICD presents with by a mixed non-specific infiltrate of lymphocytes, neutrophils, macrophages and MCs (60,61).
Activated MCs are key players in the release of histamine, leukotrienes, and prostaglandins that cause urticaria, which is primarily an innate immune disorder characterized by itching, localized oedema, and skin redness. Nonetheless, urticaria can be considered to carry a Th2 signature as IL-4 and IL-13 promote IgE synthesis. The Th2 immune response appears stronger in acute compared to chronic urticaria (62).
While the early events of morphea are driven by the Th1/Th17 pathway, the Th2 pathway is also involved in skin fibrosis. Nonetheless, Th17 effector cytokines can remain present for several years (63).
IL-4 and IL-13 have been documented in prurigo nodularis although less pronounced compared to AD. These cytokines recruit eosinophils and MCs and interact with IL-31 leading to pruritus. IL-4 and IL-13 activate itch-sensitive neurons through IL-4Rα (64). The ‘itch cytokine’ IL-31 is produced by Th2 cells. The excessive keratinocyte proliferation in prurigo nodularis is partly due to increased IL-17 and Th17 cells in lesional skin (65). Th22 cells are believed to participate in the epidermal proliferation and inflammation of prurigo nodularis (66).
Predominant Th17
Th17 cells are crucial in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. IL-23 is essential for the maintenance and late stage differentiation of Th17 cells (67). Both IL-17 and IL-23 inhibition demonstrate impressive efficacy. IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-17C, and TNF-α have been consistently found to be elevated in psoriasis skin. However, other cell types such as neutrophils and Th22 lymphocytes contribute also to the pathogenesis (68). Increased IFN-γ levels have been documented which may promote inflammation, keratinocyte proliferation and Th17 differentiation (69,70). However, anti-IFN-γ treatment did not improve psoriasis suggesting a low Th1 involvement (68).
Acne carries a predominant Th17 profile (71). Proprionibacterium acnes promotes a mixed Th17/Th1 inflammation (72). Similarly, rosacea is characterized by a strong Th17 and Th1 response. IL-6, IL-17, IL-20, and IL-22 are all increased, while IFN-γ and TNF-α are similarly elevated. There is a difference between rosacea subtypes with papulopustular rosacea exhibiting a higher Th17 polarization compared to phymatous and erythematotelangiectatic rosacea. However, innate immune cells such as neutrophils, MCs and macrophages play also major role. Papulopustular rosacea contains the highest number of macrophages (73). The Th2 pathway seems less activated in rosacea although some flares of rosacea under dupilumab have been described possibly due to demodex proliferation induced by a weakened Th2 defense (74).
Predominant Tfh
As blister formation based on anti-BP180 and anti-BP230 is the main pathogenic mechanism of bullous pemphigoid, Tfh are likely to have an important contribution. Serum IL-21 is increased in patients with bullous pemphigoid and the frequency of circulating Tfh correlates with anti-BP180 titers. Depletion of Tfh and neutralization of IL-21 inhibits T cell-induced B cell activation in bullous pemphigoid (75). Besides, bullous pemphigoid shows signs of Th2 and to a lesser extent Th17 activation. IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 are implied in Ab formation, pruritus and eosinophil recruitment (76). In bullous pemphigoid, serum concentrations of IL-17 and IL-23 have prognostic relevance. Th17 cytokines stimulate the production of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) by neutrophils. The protease MMP-9 facilitates dermo-epidermal division (77).
Increased Tfh, high IL-21 levels and Th17 cells are typical for pemphigus (78). Tissue-resident memory T cells having a follicular helper-like phenotype are responsible for the maintenance and relapse of the disease (79). Several subsets of IL-17A+ T cells subsets were discovered in pemphigus patients with Tfh17 lymphocytes having a strong capacity for Dsg3 and Dsg1 production by memory B cells in pemphigus vulgaris and foliaceus, respectively (80). Additionally, Tfh2 cells are reported to play a pathogenic role in pemphigus vulgaris (81).
Tfh have rarely been investigated in large cell vasculitis. Increased circulating Tfh were identified in granulomatosis with polyangiitis which improves in patients receiving rituximab (82). In small vessel vasculitis such as Henoch-Schönlein, increased IL-21 values and circulating follicular T cells are present which decrease after successful treatment (83). In most forms of vasculitis, the Th17 signal is strong while the contribution of Th1 and Th2 depends on the type and duration of the vasculitis (84).
CONVENTIONAL IMMUNOSUPPRESSANTS/IMMUNOMODULATORS
Steroids are the broadest acting choice for dampening inflammatory responses. Glucocorticosteroids (GC) act on almost all types of cells and especially immune cells. GC is a small lipophilic hormone that can rapidly reach most of the target cells. GC bind to an intracellular GR receptor resulting in various signaling cascades leading to the inhibition of both innate immune cells such as neutrophils, Ag presenting cells, Th1, Th2, Th17, and Tfh (85,86). Calcineurin inhibitors such as cyclosporine and tacrolimus are potent and relative selective inhibitors of T cells. They have minimal effects on already activated cytotoxic T cells, granulocytes and macrophages (87). Calcineurin inhibitors restrict the phosphorylation of the NFAT family. Inhibition of IL-2 results in decreased T-cell receptor induced proliferation. Furthermore, a broad range of cytokines including IL-3, IL-4, TNF-α, Il-17, IL-21, and IFN-γ are decreased. Tacrolimus is more potent than cyclosporin with a better safety profile. Nonetheless, despite frequent topical application, data on oral tacrolimus are more limited compared to oral cyclosporine due to its longer historical use. Methotrexate was originally developed as an anti-folate chemotherapeutic. However, its immunomodulating effects are unlikely to originate from the folate pathway. The anti-inflammatory action has more recently been attributed to inhibition of the JAK1/2 pathway (88). Methotrexate suppresses pSTAT5 phosphorylation (88). It inhibits cytokines across all Th pathways including IL-4, IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and GM-CSF (89). Mycophenolate mofetil exerts primarily a cytostatic effect on activated lymphocytes and also reduces a broad range of cytokines across all Th pathways. Mycophenolate mofetil prevents the differentiation of B cells into plasma cells and IL-21 stimulated B cells making it an attractive option for bullous disorders. Furthermore, mycophenolate mofetil reduces the expression of CD40L and inducible costimulator of T cells. This inhibits the IgG production of B cells induced by T cells (90,91). Azathioprine inhibits purine synthesis and modulates rac1 which induces T cell apoptosis in the presence of CD28 (92). This leads to a broad immunosuppressing activity affecting all Th subsets. Dimethyl fumarate has a complex mode of action resulting in antioxidative and immunomodulatory effects. It has inhibitory effects on dendritic cell maturation and an impact on T cell differentiation, T cell activity and apoptosis. Findings in multiple sclerosis and psoriasis indicate a downregulation of Th1 and Th17 activity without suppression of Th2 lymphocytes (93). Tfh are suppressed by dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis patients (94). Nonetheless, dimethyl fumarate has in dermatology rarely been tested outside the field of psoriasis. Dapsone has primarily an anti-neutrophilic action with limited influence on Th subsets. The physiologic concentrations of hydroxychloroquine are in the blood too low to affect T or B cell proliferation although drug concentrations in tissues may be higher (95). Nonetheless, in inflammatory cases hydroxychloroquine alters the Th1/Th2 balance in favor of the latter and may also reduce Th17 activity. Additionally, in collagen-induced arthritis hydroxychloroquine inhibits the generation of Tfh by blocking IL-12 and IL-21 signaling (96). Hydroxychloroquine has effects on innate immune cells such as MCs by decreasing their long-term survival and accumulating non-functional tryptase (97). A decreased activity of neutrophils and especially the formation of neutrophilic extracellular traps can be beneficial in several autoimmune diseases including lupus and vasculitis (95).
BIOLOGICS
The Th17 pathway has currently the widest choice in biologics that suppress several upstream and downstream cytokines. The development of Th17 cells can be reduced by inhibiting IL-23 using risankizumab, guselkumab, and tildrakizumab. Ustekinumab targets both IL-23 and IL-12. Nonetheless, despite inhibiting IL-12 it is considered to mainly impact the Th17 pathway with very limited impact on Th1 cell differentiation. The available anti-IL17A biologics are secukinumab and ixekizumab, while bimekizumab targets both IL-17A and IL-17F. Brodalumab is an IL-17RA inhibitor blocking the signaling of IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-17C, and IL-17E (98). IL-1 inhibition can improve Th17-related diseases (e.g., hidradenitis suppurativa), although no biologic targeting IL-1 has been FDA-approved in dermatology (99). More recently, also for the Th2 pathway several biologics were formulated. Dupilumab blocks the IL-4Rα receptor inhibiting both IL-4 and IL-13. Tralokinumab and lebrikizumab are IgG4 monoclonal Abs binding selectively to IL-13. Although Tfh are not directly inhibited by anti-CD20 monoclonal Abs such as rituximab, treatment with rituximab decreases the number of Tfh and IL-21 levels (100). Blocking IgE Abs (e.g., omalizumab) decreases the activity of MCs, especially in the context of urticaria with an indirect effect on Th2 and Tfh cells (101).
ARYL HYDROCARBON RECEPTOR (AHR) AGONISTS
The AHR operates as a ligand-activated transcription factor that orchestrates both positive and negative responses generating pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects depending on the immune environment (102,103). Activation of AHR through its specific ligands influences the differentiation of T cells and the functionality of Tregs and Ag-presenting cells. AHR regulates the production of cytokines including IL-10, IL-21, and IL-22, and is involved in the differentiation of regulatory T cells and Th17 cells (104). Activation of AHR, through specific agonists like topical tapinarof in psoriasis, reduces skin inflammation and leads to early clinical improvements with 41% complete disease clearance (105). AHR signaling downregulates the Th1 pathway by enhancing IL-10 production and CD39 expression by regulatory T1 cells which induces broad immunosuppressive activities (106). In AD, the IL-13/IL-4-JAK-STAT6 pathway suppresses AHR's role in promoting the transcription of skin barrier proteins like fillagrin, loricrin, and involucrin (107).
PROSTANOIDS
Prostanoids, specifically prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), play a pivotal role in the immune regulation of inflammatory skin conditions, such as AD. It can both inhibit and provoke inflammatory responses by affecting the balance of Th1/Th17 and regulatory T cells, influencing cytokine production and eosinophil infiltration (108,109). In general, prostanoids suppress Th1-mediated immunity and inhibit IFN-γ. This explains the use of topical prostaglandins in alopecia areata and vitiligo. PGE2 induces Th2 cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 and promotes IL-17 and IL-22 production with increased Th17 activity (110,111).
SMALL MOLECULES
Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors
Inhibition of PDE4, leads to intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate production which inhibits proinflammatory signals (e.g., IL-6, IL-8, IL-13, TNF-α, IL-17, IL-22, and IL-23), while anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 increase. 4 types of PDE4 exist of which PDE4B and PDE4D are the predominant drivers of inflammation with limited additional contribution of PDE4A (112). Apremilast, the first orally administered PDE4 inhibitor approved for psoriasis inhibits all 4 isoforms of PDE4 (113). Apremilast, mainly acts on innate immune cells and to a lesser extent on lymphocytes (114). Nonetheless, a reduction of Th1 and Th17 molecules have been reported with apremilast such as IL-2, IL-12, IL-23, and TNF-α (115). The development of topical formulations like roflumilast for psoriasis and crisaborole for AD has significantly mitigated the common gastrointestinal side effects associated with oral apremilast by minimizing systemic absorption (116). Other PDE inhibitors exist including orismilast, notable for its selectivity towards PDE4B and PDE4D subtypes (112).
JAK inhibitors
The JAK family consists of 4 members: JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and Tyk2. All cytokine receptors are associated with one or more JAKs for their downstream signal transduction through STAT dimerization, translocation to the nucleus and transcription (117). Although targeted, all JAKs are responsible for the signaling of a relatively broad range of cytokines. JAK1 is responsible for Th1 cytokines (e.g., IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-15, IL-27), Th2 cytokines (e.g., IL-4, IL-5, IL-13), the follicular Th cytokine IL-21 and a broad range of other cytokines (such as IFN-α, IFN-β, LIF, OSM, IL-6, IL-7, IL-9, IL-10, IL-19, IL-20, IL-22, IL-27, IL-28, IL-29, IL-35). JAK2 signals also the key Th1 cytokine IFN-γ, the Th2 cytokine IL-13, the Th17 cytokine IL-23 and other cytokines (e.g., IL-6, LIF, OSM, IL-10, IL-19, IL-20, IL-22, and IL-27). JAK3 involves a more restricted number of cytokines of the Th1 pathway, IL-2 and IL-15, the Th2 pathway, IL-4, the Tfh IL-21, and other cytokines including IL-7, and IL-9. Tyk2 has a more limited scope involving IFN-α, IFN-β, LIF, OSM, IL-6, IL-10, IL-11, IL-12, IL-19, IL-20, IL-22, IL-27, and IL-23. Regarding innate immunity, JAK1/2 and Tyk2 affect the activity of Ag presenting cells such as monocytes and dendritic cells. JAK1 and Tyk2 decrease the signaling of NK cells, while JAK2 decreases cytokine signaling affecting neutrophil function and survival. JAK3 seems only to have an indirect effect on innate immune cells (118). JAK1 selective inhibitors include upadacitinib, abrocitinib, and povorcitinib, while anti-JAK1/JAK2 inhibitors are ruxolitinib and baricitinib. Ritlecitinib is an anti-JAK3 blocker. Anti-Tyk2 inhibition is carried out by deucravacitinib and tofacitinib is a panJAK inhibitor.
TEC inhibition
Tyrosine-protein kinase TEC is expressed by hematopoietic liver and kidney cells and regulates Th cell activities. TEC modulates cytokine receptor signaling, lymphocyte surface Ags and integrins. TEC kinase is upregulated in activated T cells and especially in Th2 cells. In contrast, without TEC kinase Th17 cells are increased in number and higher levels of IL-17A, IL-17F are detectable. Ritlecitinib is an example of a JAK3/TEC inhibitor (119).
IL-1 inhibition
Anakinra and lutikizumab (ABT-981) are anti-IL1A/1B drugs being explored for in several immune-mediated diseases, including HS. By targeting two forms of interleukin-1 (IL1α and IL1β) inflammatory responses are dampened (120,121). IL-1 is involved in promoting Th17 cell differentiation with less clear effects on Th1, Th2, and Tfh. IL-1 drives innate immunity and regulates the long-term memory of innate immune cells (122).
UPCOMING THERAPEUTIC DEVELOPMENTS
PD-1 agonists
Instead of blocking inhibitory signals, enhancing the immune system's capacity to identify and eliminate cancer cells, PD-1 agonists activate the PD-1 pathway, aiming to regulate autoimmune diseases by dampening the immune response to self-tissues. Given the frequent development of vitiligo and other skin eruptions in patients receiving anti-PD1 therapy, PD-1 agonists may improve several immune-mediates skin disorders (123). JNJ-4703 is currently undergoing phase II clinical trials for the treatment of AD (124).
Bruton kinase
Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) a crucial enzyme within the TEC family of kinases. BTK stimulates the activity of various immune cells, including B cells, MCs, macrophages, and basophils, by mediating signals from receptors like the B-cell receptor and the IgE receptor FcεRI in MCs (125,126). Autoimmune diseases see BTK facilitating the activation and differentiation of autoreactive B cells into cells that produce autoantibodies, correlating BTK expression with the severity of autoimmune conditions, especially bullous skin disorders (127). In allergic responses, BTK is key to the process where allergens trigger IgE crosslinking on MCs and basophils, leading to the release of inflammatory mediators (128). Additionally, BTK contributes to other inflammatory mechanisms such as IgG-mediated activation of monocytes and migration of neutrophils (129). Next-generation BTK inhibitors, including fenebrutinib, remibrutinib, rilzabrutinib, and tirabrutinib are under research for their potential in treating chronic spontaneous urticaria and pemphigus (130).
IL-21 receptor inhibitors
IL-21 plays a crucial part in driving CD4+ T cells towards a Th17 profile and enhances the expression of CXCR5 on T cells, which is pivotal for the development of Tfh and the formation of germinal centers (131). The primary sources of IL-21 include Th17 and Tfh cells, and to a lesser degree, NK cells (132). The production of IL-21 can be stimulated by several cytokines like IL-6, IL-7, and IL-15 through the activation of STAT3, although IL-4 does not seem to induce its production. Intriguingly, IL-21 can also augment its own expression through a positive autocrine feedback loop (133).
Emerging research suggests IL-21's involvement in the pathogenesis of various inflammatory skin diseases such as AD, lichen planus, psoriasis and classical autoimmune diseases including (lupus erythematosus), pemphigus, Sjögren's syndrome, and systemic sclerosis (134).
Anti-IL22 receptor
IL-22 is highly present in severe AD skin. In chronic AD a conversion of Th2 signaling to a mixed activation of Th1, Th22, and Th2 takes place. IL-22 induces skin acanthosis. Anti-IL-22 blockade showed only clinical efficacy in patients with severe AD. In these patients, IL-22 inhibition downregulated Th1, Th2, Th17, Th22 signaling leading to a broad immune dampening response (135).
Anti-IL31
The ‘itch’ cytokine IL-31 is produced by immune cells (Th cells, dendritic cells, and monocytes/macrophages) and skin cells (fibroblasts, keratinocytes). While histamine leads to acute itch, IL-31 is more produced in AD. It stimulates keratinocyte proliferation which is clinically seen by lichenification which represents a combined Th2, Th17, and Th1 signaling (136).
Anti-OX40/OX40 ligands (OX40L)
Anti-OX40 and anti-OX40L inhibitors such as rocatinlimab and amlitelimab are developed for AD. OX40 is a co-stimulatory T cell receptor which is mainly expressed by effector and regulatory T cells. The ligand of OX40 is found on macrophages, activated B cells, endothelial cells and activated Ag presenting cells. The binding of OX40L to OX40 induces Th1 and Th2 proliferation and survival, cytokine production, and development of memory T cells. This signaling is crucial for memory Th2 responses and subsequent IL-4, IL-13, and IL-22 production. OX40 is expressed upon IL-33 production by keratinocytes but also by other cytokines such as TNF-α, IFN-γ, and PGE2 (137). OX40/OX40L regulates Tfh differentiation which is likely to play a role in several autoimmune disorders such as lupus (138).
IL-2 mutein
IL-2 activates both Tregs as inflammatory immune cells which has triggered research to increase Treg specificity. Mutant proteins of IL-2 having decreased affinity for CD122 exhibit more Treg inducing capacity with less effect on other immune cells (139). Tregs can inhibit all Th pathways although IFN-γ production by Th1 cells, and IL-17 by Th17 cells can be more efficiently inhibited compared to Th2 cells.
Anti-IL-15/IL-15 receptor (IL-15R)
Neutralizing IL-15 or the IL-15R is a promising strategy to inhibit IFN-γ producing memory T cells. Its potential seems to primarily be in Th1-mediated disorders. Mice experiments showed reversal of vitiligo in mice using IL-15 blockade (140). Data of human trials in dermatology remain currently unavailable.
Anti-neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)
The FcRn regulates the transport, distribution, and persistence of IgG. As a therapeutic, anti-FcRn can decrease the half-life of pathogenic Abs, similar to plasma exchange and immunoabsorption (141). Anti-FcRn has been shown to decrease desmoglein-specific B cells in pemphigus (142). Nipocalimab is being tested for lupus.
DISCUSSION
Cutaneous inflammatory disorders are extremely varied and display different contributions of immune pathways. Having insights into the immune balance of each skin disease and the working mechanisms of possible treatments can be extremely helpful for the treatment of recalcitrant and complex cases. It also provides an opportunity to look into the future for possible therapeutic approaches. Biologics are likely the best choice for skin diseases with one dominant immune pathway. Biologics can offer impressive results with limited side effects due to their restricted collateral damage on immunity. However, to date we still lack a biologic approach targeting the Th1 pathway for the treatment of alopecia areata, vitiligo and other Th1 dominant disorders. While inhibition of the Th2 (e.g., AD) and the Th17 pathway (e.g., psoriasis) can be done without severely hampering our body’s defense against life-threatening pathogens or diseases, it remains unclear whether this approach is feasible for the Th1 pathway given its crucial role in antiviral and antitumoral protection. Nonetheless, given the redundancy of most signaling pathways targeted treatment has been shown to be remarkably safe even if key signaling cascades are blocked (14,18).
As can be seen in Table 1, a substantial number of skin diseases exhibit a combined upregulation of multiple Th lineages (e.g., bullous pemphigoid, dermatomyositis, eosinophilic fasciitis, graft-versus-host disease, pus, morphea…). This can lead to an inconsistent efficacy of biologics depending on the patient profile. Clinical and laboratory signs can point to activity of certain Th pathways. The loss of skin cells or interface dermatitis points to a Th1 dominance, while pruritus, skin fibrosis, eosinophils and high IgE values reflect Th2 activation. In contrast, pustular inflammation, and hyperkeratosis reflect Th17 and/or Th22 signaling. Small molecules such as JAK inhibitors offer significant advantages in terms of potency over conventional immunosuppressants if multiple Th pathways are increased. Although clinical trials have yet to provide a clear picture of the in vivo differential effectiveness of JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, or Tyk2 inhibition depending on the immune infiltrate, an estimate can be derived based on their inhibitory cytokine profile (Table 2). JAK1 and JAK2 inhibition seem most potent to inhibit Th1 disorders, while blocking JAK3 or Tyk2 might lead to less long-term adverse effects by not directly targeting IFN-γ (117).
Table 2. Inhibition of the Th1, Th2, Th17, Tfh pathways according to the immunomodulating drug.
| Drug type | Th1 | Th2 | Th17 | Tfh | Innate immunity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classic immunomodulating drugs/immunosuppressants | ||||||
| Corticosteroids* | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | |
| Ciclosporin (PSO, AD) | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | |
| Tacrolimus (AD) | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | |
| Methotrexate (PSO) | +++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| Mycophenolate mofetil | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++ | |
| Azathioprine | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| Fumaric acid (PSO) | ++ | / | ++ | +++ | ++ | |
| Anti-inflammatory drugs | ||||||
| Dapsone (DH) | + | / | + | / | ++ | |
| Hydroxychloroquine (SLE) | + | / | + | + | ++ | |
| Biologics | ||||||
| Anti-IL-1 | + | ++ | ||||
| Anti-IL-4Rα (AD, PN) | / | ++++ | / | +++ | / | |
| Anti-IL13 (AD) | / | ++++ | / | / | / | |
| Anti-IL17A (PSO) | / | / | ++++ | / | + | |
| Anti-IL17A/IL17F (PSO) | / | / | +++++ | / | + | |
| Anti-IL17RA (PSO) | / | + | +++++ | / | + | |
| Anti-IL23 (PSO) | / | / | ++++ | / | / | |
| Anti-IL12/23 (PSO) | + | / | ++++ | / | / | |
| Anti-IL31 (AD, PN) | / | ++ | + | / | / | |
| Anti-IgE (URT) | / | + | / | ++ | +++ | |
| Anti-CD20 (PEMPH) | / | / | / | +++† | / | |
| PDE4 inhibitors | ||||||
| Apremilast (PSO) | + | + | ++ | / | ++ | |
| Roflumilast (SD) | + | + | ++ | / | ++ | |
| JAK inhibitors | ||||||
| JAK1 (AA, VIT) | ++++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | |
| JAK2 (AA, VIT) | ++++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | |
| JAK3 (AA) | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | / | |
| Tyk2 (PSO) | +++ | + | +++ | + | ++ | |
| Estimated influence of new therapeutics with limited data | ||||||
| AHR agonists (PSO, AD) | ++(+?) | ++(+?) | +++ | ++ | ++ | |
| Anti-FcRn | / | / | / | ++++ | / | |
| Anti-Il-1a/1b | + | / | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| Anti-IL-15/IL-15R | +++ | / | / | / | + | |
| Anti-IL21R | / | +++ | ++ | +++ | ++ | |
| Anti-IL22R | / | +++ | ++ | ++ | ||
| Anti-OX40 | +++ | +++ | + | +++ | ++ | |
| Bruton kinase inhibitors | / | ++ | + | +++† | ++ | |
| IL-2 mutein | +++ | + | +++ | ++ | + | |
| PD-1 agonists | +++ | ++ | ++ | / | ++ | |
| Prostanoids | ++ | / | / | / | ++ | |
Between brackets: FDA or EMA approved indication.
Inhibition: ++++, very strong; +++, strong; ++, moderate; +, limited; /, no; ?, unknown.
PSO, psoriasis; DH, dermatitis herpetiformis; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; PN, prurigo nodularis; URT, urticaria; PEMPH, pemphigus; SD, seborrheic dermatitis; AA, alopecia areata; VIT, vitiligo; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; EMA, European Medicines Agency.
*FDA- and EMA approved for a wide range of inflammatory skin conditions; †These drugs directly target B lymphocytes with indirect influence on Tfh cells.
Unexpected or ‘paradoxal’ phenomena during immunotherapy can in part be explained by the contribution of a network of cytokines regulating the differentiation of naive T cells. Additionally, Th17 cells retain stem cell-like properties and can transdifferentiate to acquire a Th1, Th2 or Treg-like phenotype depending on the changed immune environment by treatments. Additionally, cytokines (including IL-4) also have, besides the capacity to induce one Th lineage (e.g., Th2), an inhibiting effect on other immune cell subsets (e.g., Th1, Th17). Due to the complex interaction with other driving cytokines (e.g., reciprocal inhibitory effect of IL-4 and TGF-β on each other) a positive or negative influence on the development and evolution of inflammatory skin disorders can be seen depending on the immune environment. An example is the use of dupilumab for alopecia areata, which is only effective in case of an atopic background illustrated by high IgE levels (143). Further research to understand the synergistic and antagonistic interactions between cytokines and their impact on immune cell behavior is crucial given the fast-growing therapeutic arsenal in dermatology. In other circumstances such as with IL-22R inhibition, the treatment is only effective in a particular state of the disease (e.g., severe AD) which can be seen clinically by lichenification, severe pruritus and epidermal hyperplasia reflecting a mixed Th2, Th1, Th17 and Th22 response (136). One may choose to target only the key cytokine causing the most disturbing complaint such as itch by blocking IL-31. This may not necessarily clear the entire diseased skin but improve the quality of life considerably (144).
Future study design may look further than skin (disease), but take into account the concept of ‘multimorbidity’, with endpoints in several organ diseases at the same time, with common pathogenetic origin (145). A limitation of this review is the non-exhaustive list of therapeutic targets covered, considering the large number of drug targets currently under investigation in dermatology.
Abbreviations
- AD
atopic dermatitis
- AHR
aryl hydrocarbon receptor
- BTK
Bruton's tyrosine kinase
- FcRn
neonatal Fc receptor
- GC
glucocorticosteroids
- ICD
irritant contact dermatitis
- IL-15R
IL-15 receptor
- MC
mast cell
- MMP-9
matrix metalloproteinase-9
- OX40L
OX40 ligands
- PDE4
phosphodiesterase 4
- PGE2
prostaglandin E2
- Tfh
follicular Th cells
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
- Conceptualization: Speeckaert R.
- Writing - original draft: Speeckaert R, Belpaire A.
- Writing - review & editing: Speeckaert R, Belpaire A, Lambert J, Speeckaert M, van Geel N.
References
- 1.Pawlak M, Ho AW, Kuchroo VK. Cytokines and transcription factors in the differentiation of CD4+ T helper cell subsets and induction of tissue inflammation and autoimmunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2020;67:57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2020.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ho AW, Kupper TS. T cells and the skin: from protective immunity to inflammatory skin disorders. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;19:490–502. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0162-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kortekaas Krohn I, Aerts JL, Breckpot K, Goyvaerts C, Knol E, Van Wijk F, Gutermuth J. T-cell subsets in the skin and their role in inflammatory skin disorders. Allergy. 2022;77:827–842. doi: 10.1111/all.15104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Harris JE, Harris TH, Weninger W, Wherry EJ, Hunter CA, Turka LA. A mouse model of vitiligo with focused epidermal depigmentation requires IFN-γ for autoreactive CD8+ T-cell accumulation in the skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132:1869–1876. doi: 10.1038/jid.2011.463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Freyschmidt-Paul P, McElwee KJ, Hoffmann R, Sundberg JP, Vitacolonna M, Kissling S, Zöller M. Interferon-gamma-deficient mice are resistant to the development of alopecia areata. Br J Dermatol. 2006;155:515–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07377.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bradley LM, Dalton DK, Croft M. A direct role for IFN-gamma in regulation of Th1 cell development. J Immunol. 1996;157:1350–1358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kang S, Brown HM, Hwang S. Direct antiviral mechanisms of interferon-gamma. Immune Netw. 2018;18:e33. doi: 10.4110/in.2018.18.e33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sareneva T, Julkunen I, Matikainen S. IFN-alpha and IL-12 induce IL-18 receptor gene expression in human NK and T cells. J Immunol. 2000;165:1933–1938. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.4.1933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Waldmann TA. The biology of interleukin-2 and interleukin-15: implications for cancer therapy and vaccine design. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:595–601. doi: 10.1038/nri1901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kalia V, Sarkar S. Regulation of effector and memory CD8 T cell differentiation by IL-2-A balancing act. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2987. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Waldmann TA. The shared and contrasting roles of IL2 and IL15 in the life and death of normal and neoplastic lymphocytes: implications for cancer therapy. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3:219–227. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Finkelman FD, Urban JF., Jr The other side of the coin: the protective role of the TH2 cytokines. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;107:772–780. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.114989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Howell MD, Kim BE, Boguniewicz M, Leung DYM. Modulation of filaggrin by Th2 cytokines in the skin of atopic dermatitis (AD) J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;119:S283. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.04.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tazawa T, Sugiura H, Sugiura Y, Uehara M. Relative importance of IL-4 and IL-13 in lesional skin of atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol Res. 2004;295:459–464. doi: 10.1007/s00403-004-0455-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhu J. T helper 2 (Th2) cell differentiation, type 2 innate lymphoid cell (ILC2) development and regulation of interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-13 production. Cytokine. 2015;75:14–24. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2015.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Punnonen J, Aversa G, Cocks BG, McKenzie AN, Menon S, Zurawski G, de Waal Malefyt R, de Vries JE. Interleukin 13 induces interleukin 4-independent IgG4 and IgE synthesis and CD23 expression by human B cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:3730–3734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.8.3730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gieseck RL, 3rd, Wilson MS, Wynn TA. Type 2 immunity in tissue repair and fibrosis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18:62–76. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Speeckaert R, Lambert J, Grine L, Van Gele M, De Schepper S, van Geel N. The many faces of interleukin-17 in inflammatory skin diseases. Br J Dermatol. 2016;175:892–901. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Amatya N, Garg AV, Gaffen SL. IL-17 signaling: the yin and the yang. Trends Immunol. 2017;38:310–322. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2017.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nies JF, Panzer U. IL-17C/IL-17RE: emergence of a unique axis in TH17 biology. Front Immunol. 2020;11:341. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ge Y, Huang M, Yao YM. Biology of interleukin-17 and its pathophysiological significance in sepsis. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1558. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Huangfu L, Li R, Huang Y, Wang S. The IL-17 family in diseases: from bench to bedside. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:402. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01620-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Borowczyk J, Buerger C, Tadjrischi N, Drukala J, Wolnicki M, Wnuk D, Modarressi A, Boehncke WH, Brembilla NC. IL-17E (IL-25) and IL-17A differentially affect the functions of human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 2020;140:1379–1389.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stritesky GL, Yeh N, Kaplan MH. IL-23 promotes maintenance but not commitment to the Th17 lineage. J Immunol. 2008;181:5948–5955. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.9.5948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tollenaere MA, Hebsgaard J, Ewald DA, Lovato P, Garcet S, Li X, Pilger SD, Tiirikainen ML, Bertelsen M, Krueger JG, et al. Signalling of multiple interleukin (IL)-17 family cytokines via IL-17 receptor A drives psoriasis-related inflammatory pathways. Br J Dermatol. 2021;185:585–594. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lauffer F, Jargosch M, Baghin V, Krause L, Kempf W, Absmaier-Kijak M, Morelli M, Madonna S, Marsais F, Lepescheux L, et al. IL-17C amplifies epithelial inflammation in human psoriasis and atopic eczema. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:800–809. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Borowczyk J, Shutova M, Brembilla NC, Boehncke WH. IL-25 (IL-17E) in epithelial immunology and pathophysiology. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;148:40–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.12.628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Walker LS. The link between circulating follicular helper T cells and autoimmunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2022;22:567–575. doi: 10.1038/s41577-022-00693-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ma CS, Deenick EK, Batten M, Tangye SG. The origins, function, and regulation of T follicular helper cells. J Exp Med. 2012;209:1241–1253. doi: 10.1084/jem.20120994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Speeckaert R, Belpaire A, Speeckaert MM, van Geel N. A meta-analysis of chemokines in vitiligo: recruiting immune cells towards melanocytes. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1112811. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1112811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zainodini N, Hassanshahi G, Arababadi MK, Khorramdelazad H, Mirzaei A. Differential expression of CXCL1, CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL12 chemokines in alopecia areata. Iran J Immunol. 2013;10:40–46. doi: 10.22034/iji.2013.16802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hsueh YC, Wang Y, Riding RL, Catalano DE, Lu YJ, Richmond JM, Siegel DL, Rusckowski M, Stanley JR, Harris JE. A keratinocyte-tethered biologic enables location-precise treatment in mouse vitiligo. J Invest Dermatol. 2022;142:3294–3303. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2022.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Valsecchi R, Imberti G, Martino D, Cainelli T. Alopecia areata and interleukin-2 receptor. Dermatology. 1992;184:126–128. doi: 10.1159/000247519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Speeckaert R, Lambert J, van Geel N. Clinical significance of serum soluble CD molecules to assess disease activity in vitiligo. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:1194–1200. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.2366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Montilla AM, Gómez-García F, Gómez-Arias PJ, Gay-Mimbrera J, Hernández-Parada J, Isla-Tejera B, Ruano J. Scoping review on the use of drugs targeting JAK/STAT pathway in atopic dermatitis, vitiligo, and alopecia areata. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2019;9:655–683. doi: 10.1007/s13555-019-00329-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Speeckaert R, Speeckaert M, De Schepper S, van Geel N. Biomarkers of disease activity in vitiligo: a systematic review. Autoimmun Rev. 2017;16:937–945. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Passeron T, King B, Seneschal J, Steinhoff M, Jabbari A, Ohyama M, Tobin DJ, Randhawa S, Winkler A, Telliez JB, et al. Inhibition of T-cell activity in alopecia areata: recent developments and new directions. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1243556. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1243556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lauffer F, Jargosch M, Krause L, Garzorz-Stark N, Franz R, Roenneberg S, Böhner A, Mueller NS, Theis FJ, Schmidt-Weber CB, et al. Type I immune response induces keratinocyte necroptosis and is associated with interface dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138:1785–1794. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Solimani F, Pollmann R, Schmidt T, Schmidt A, Zheng X, Savai R, Mühlenbein S, Pickert J, Eubel V, Möbs C, et al. Therapeutic targeting of Th17/Tc17 cells leads to clinical improvement of lichen planus. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1808. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pietschke K, Holstein J, Meier K, Schäfer I, Müller-Hermelink E, Gonzalez-Menendez I, Quintanilla-Martinez L, Ghoreschi FC, Solimani F, Ghoreschi K. The inflammation in cutaneous lichen planus is dominated by IFN-ϒ and IL-21-A basis for therapeutic JAK1 inhibition. Exp Dermatol. 2021;30:262–270. doi: 10.1111/exd.14226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tan YQ, Li Q, Zhang J, Du GF, Lu R, Zhou G. Increased circulating CXCR5+ CD4+ T follicular helper-like cells in oral lichen planus. J Oral Pathol Med. 2017;46:803–809. doi: 10.1111/jop.12550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wang H, Jiang Y, Wang H, Luo Z, Wang Y, Guan X. IL-25 promotes Th2-type reactions and correlates with disease severity in the pathogenesis of oral lichen planus. Arch Oral Biol. 2019;98:115–121. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Terlou A, Santegoets LAM, van der Meijden WI, Heijmans-Antonissen C, Swagemakers SMA, van der Spek PJ, Ewing PC, van Beurden M, Helmerhorst TJ, Blok LJ. An autoimmune phenotype in vulvar lichen sclerosus and lichen planus: a Th1 response and high levels of microRNA-155. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132:658–666. doi: 10.1038/jid.2011.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wang L, Lv Q, Guo J, Wang J, Pan J. Transcriptome profiling and network analysis provide insights into the pathogenesis of vulvar lichen sclerosus. Front Genet. 2022;13:905450. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.905450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Peterson DM, Damsky WE, Vesely MD. Treatment of lichen sclerosus and hypertrophic scars with dupilumab. JAAD Case Rep. 2022;23:76–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2022.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Muhammad Yusoff F, Wong KK, Mohd Redzwan N. Th1, Th2, and Th17 cytokines in systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmunity. 2020;53:8–20. doi: 10.1080/08916934.2019.1693545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nakayamada S, Tanaka Y. Clinical relevance of T follicular helper cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2021;17:1143–1150. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2021.1976146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bitar C, Maghfour J, Ho-Pham H, Stumpf B, Boh E. Apremilast as a potential treatment for moderate to severe dermatomyositis: a retrospective study of 3 patients. JAAD Case Rep. 2019;5:191–194. doi: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2018.11.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Shimojima Y, Ishii W, Matsuda M, Ikeda S. Phenotypes of peripheral blood lymphocytes and cytokine expression in polymyositis and dermatomyositis before treatment and after clinical remission. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;5:77–87. doi: 10.4137/CMAMD.S10272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Broos CE, Koth LL, van Nimwegen M, In ’t Veen JC, Paulissen SM, van Hamburg JP, Annema JT, Heller-Baan R, Kleinjan A, Hoogsteden HC, et al. Increased T-helper 17.1 cells in sarcoidosis mediastinal lymph nodes. Eur Respir J. 2018;51:1701124. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01124-2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bordignon M, Rottoli P, Agostini C, Alaibac M. Adaptive immune responses in primary cutaneous sarcoidosis. Clin Dev Immunol. 2011;2011:235142. doi: 10.1155/2011/235142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhou ER, Arce S. Key players and biomarkers of the adaptive immune system in the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:7398. doi: 10.3390/ijms21197398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Antiga E, Maglie R, Volpi W, Bianchi B, Berti E, Marzano AV, Caproni M. T helper type 1-related molecules as well as interleukin-15 are hyperexpressed in the skin lesions of patients with pyoderma gangrenosum. Clin Exp Immunol. 2017;189:383–391. doi: 10.1111/cei.12989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Flora A, Kozera E, Frew JW. Pyoderma gangrenosum: a systematic review of the molecular characteristics of disease. Exp Dermatol. 2022;31:498–515. doi: 10.1111/exd.14534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Min MS, Wu J, He H, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Del Duca E, Zhang N, Renert-Yuval Y, Pavel AB, Lebwohl M, Guttman-Yassky E. Granuloma annulare skin profile shows activation of T-helper cell type 1, T-helper cell type 2, and Janus kinase pathways. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.12.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Paganini C, Talamonti M, Campione E, Bianchi L, Galluzzo M. Letter in response to the case report: “recalcitrant generalized granuloma annulare treated successfully with dupilumab”. JAAD Case Rep. 2023;39:152–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2023.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Orfali RL, Aoki V. Blockage of the IL-31 pathway as a potential target therapy for atopic dermatitis. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:577. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Li H, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Guo Y, Yao Z. Update on the pathogenesis and therapy of atopic dermatitis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2021;61:324–338. doi: 10.1007/s12016-021-08880-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Noda S, Suárez-Fariñas M, Ungar B, Kim SJ, de Guzman Strong C, Xu H, Peng X, Estrada YD, Nakajima S, Honda T, et al. The Asian atopic dermatitis phenotype combines features of atopic dermatitis and psoriasis with increased TH17 polarization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136:1254–1264. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Leonard A, Guttman-Yassky E. The unique molecular signatures of contact dermatitis and implications for treatment. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019;56:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s12016-018-8685-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Nosbaum A, Vocanson M, Rozieres A, Hennino A, Nicolas JF. Allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol. 2009;19:325–332. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2009.0686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Chen Q, Zhong H, Chen WC, Zhai Z, Zhou Z, Song Z, Hao F. Different expression patterns of plasma Th1-, Th2-, Th17- and Th22-related cytokines correlate with serum autoreactivity and allergen sensitivity in chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32:441–448. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.LaChance AH, Goldman N, Kassamali B, Vleugels RA. Immunologic underpinnings and treatment of morphea. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2022;18:461–483. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2022.2063841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Shao Y, Wang D, Zhu Y, Xiao Z, Jin T, Peng L, Shen Y, Tang H. Molecular mechanisms of pruritus in prurigo nodularis. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1301817. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1301817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Park K, Mori T, Nakamura M, Tokura Y. Increased expression of mRNAs for IL-4, IL-17, IL-22 and IL-31 in skin lesions of subacute and chronic forms of prurigo. Eur J Dermatol. 2011;21:135–136. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2010.1196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Belzberg M, Alphonse MP, Brown I, Williams KA, Khanna R, Ho B, Wongvibulsin S, Pritchard T, Roh YS, Sutaria N, et al. Prurigo nodularis is characterized by systemic and cutaneous T helper 22 immune polarization. J Invest Dermatol. 2021;141:2208–2218.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2021.02.749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Bachelez H. Interleukin 23 inhibitors for psoriasis: not just another number. Lancet. 2017;390:208–210. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31474-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hu P, Wang M, Gao H, Zheng A, Li J, Mu D, Tong J. The role of helper T cells in psoriasis. Front Immunol. 2021;12:788940. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.788940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Gu H, Zhang Y, Zeng W, Xia Y. Participation of interferons in psoriatic inflammation. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2022;64:12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2021.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Qu Y, Li D, Xiong H, Shi D. Transcriptional regulation on effector T cells in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Eur J Med Res. 2023;28:182. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01144-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kelhälä HL, Palatsi R, Fyhrquist N, Lehtimäki S, Väyrynen JP, Kallioinen M, Kubin ME, Greco D, Tasanen K, Alenius H, et al. IL-17/Th17 pathway is activated in acne lesions. PLoS One. 2014;9:e105238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kistowska M, Meier B, Proust T, Feldmeyer L, Cozzio A, Kuendig T, Contassot E, French LE. Propionibacterium acnes promotes Th17 and Th17/Th1 responses in acne patients. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135:110–118. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Buhl T, Sulk M, Nowak P, Buddenkotte J, McDonald I, Aubert J, Carlavan I, Déret S, Reiniche P, Rivier M, et al. Molecular and morphological characterization of inflammatory infiltrate in rosacea reveals activation of Th1/Th17 pathways. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135:2198–2208. doi: 10.1038/jid.2015.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Heibel HD, Hendricks AJ, Foshee JP, Shi VY. Rosacea associated with dupilumab therapy. J Dermatolog Treat. 2021;32:114–116. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1624683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Li Q, Liu Z, Dang E, Jin L, He Z, Yang L, Shi X, Wang G. Follicular helper T cells (Tfh) and IL-21 involvement in the pathogenesis of bullous pemphigoid. PLoS One. 2013;8:e68145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Huang R, Hu L, Jiang F. Study of cytokine-induced immunity in bullous pemphigoid: recent developments. Ann Med. 2023;55:2280991. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2280991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Plée J, Le Jan S, Giustiniani J, Barbe C, Joly P, Bedane C, Vabres P, Truchetet F, Aubin F, Antonicelli F, et al. Integrating longitudinal serum IL-17 and IL-23 follow-up, along with autoantibodies variation, contributes to predict bullous pemphigoid outcome. Sci Rep. 2015;5:18001. doi: 10.1038/srep18001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Hennerici T, Pollmann R, Schmidt T, Seipelt M, Tackenberg B, Möbs C, Ghoreschi K, Hertl M, Eming R. Increased frequency of t follicular helper cells and elevated interleukin-27 plasma levels in patients with pemphigus. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0148919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Zou Y, Yuan H, Zhou S, Zhou Y, Zheng J, Zhu H, Pan M. The pathogenic role of CD4+ tissue-resident memory T cells bearing t follicular helper-like phenotype in pemphigus lesions. J Invest Dermatol. 2021;141:2141–2150. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2021.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Holstein J, Solimani F, Baum C, Meier K, Pollmann R, Didona D, Tekath T, Dugas M, Casadei N, Hudemann C, et al. Immunophenotyping in pemphigus reveals a TH17/TFH17 cell-dominated immune response promoting desmoglein1/3-specific autoantibody production. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;147:2358–2369. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kim AR, Han D, Choi JY, Seok J, Kim SE, Seo SH, Takahashi H, Amagai M, Park SH, Kim SC, et al. Targeting inducible costimulator expressed on CXCR5+PD-1+ TH cells suppresses the progression of pemphigus vulgaris. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;146:1070–1079.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.03.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Zhao Y, Lutalo PMK, Thomas JE, Sangle S, Choong LM, Tyler JR, Tree T, Spencer J, D’Cruz DP. Circulating T follicular helper cell and regulatory T cell frequencies are influenced by B cell depletion in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014;53:621–630. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Gensous N, Charrier M, Duluc D, Contin-Bordes C, Truchetet ME, Lazaro E, Duffau P, Blanco P, Richez C. T follicular helper cells in autoimmune disorders. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1637. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Sanders JSF, Stegeman CA, Kallenberg CGM. The Th1 and Th2 paradigm in ANCA-associated vasculitis. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2003;26:215–220. doi: 10.1159/000072987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Liberman AC, Budziñski ML, Sokn C, Gobbini RP, Steininger A, Arzt E. Regulatory and mechanistic actions of glucocorticoids on T and inflammatory cells. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2018;9:235. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.van Geel N, Speeckaert R, Mollet I, De Schepper S, De Wolf J, Tjin EPM, Luiten RM, Lambert J, Brochez L. In vivo vitiligo induction and therapy model: double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2012;25:57–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-148X.2011.00922.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Flores C, Fouquet G, Moura IC, Maciel TT, Hermine O. Lessons to learn from low-dose cyclosporin-a: a new approach for unexpected clinical applications. Front Immunol. 2019;10:588. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Thomas S, Fisher KH, Snowden JA, Danson SJ, Brown S, Zeidler MP. Methotrexate is a JAK/STAT pathway inhibitor. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0130078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Gerards AH, de Lathouder S, de Groot ER, Dijkmans BAC, Aarden LA. Inhibition of cytokine production by methotrexate. Studies in healthy volunteers and patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003;42:1189–1196. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Karnell JL, Karnell FG, 3rd, Stephens GL, Rajan B, Morehouse C, Li Y, Swerdlow B, Wilson M, Goldbach-Mansky R, Groves C, et al. Mycophenolic acid differentially impacts B cell function depending on the stage of differentiation. J Immunol. 2011;187:3603–3612. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Heidt S, Roelen DL, Eijsink C, Eikmans M, van Kooten C, Claas FHJ, Mulder A. Calcineurin inhibitors affect B cell antibody responses indirectly by interfering with T cell help. Clin Exp Immunol. 2010;159:199–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2009.04051.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Tiede I, Fritz G, Strand S, Poppe D, Dvorsky R, Strand D, Lehr HA, Wirtz S, Becker C, Atreya R, et al. CD28-dependent Rac1 activation is the molecular target of azathioprine in primary human CD4+ T lymphocytes. J Clin Invest. 2003;111:1133–1145. doi: 10.1172/JCI16432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Sulaimani J, Cluxton D, Clowry J, Petrasca A, Molloy OE, Moran B, Sweeney CM, Malara A, McNicholas N, McGuigan C, et al. Dimethyl fumarate modulates the Treg-Th17 cell axis in patients with psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184:495–503. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Holm Hansen R, Højsgaard Chow H, Sellebjerg F, Rode von Essen M. Dimethyl fumarate therapy suppresses B cell responses and follicular helper T cells in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2019;25:1289–1297. doi: 10.1177/1352458518790417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.In ’t Veld AE, Grievink HW, van der Plas JL, Eveleens Maarse BC, van Kraaij SJW, Woutman TD, Schoonakker M, Klarenbeek NB, de Kam ML, Kamerling IM, et al. Immunosuppression by hydroxychloroquine: mechanistic proof in in vitro experiments but limited systemic activity in a randomized placebo-controlled clinical pharmacology study. Immunol Res. 2023;71:617–627. doi: 10.1007/s12026-023-09367-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Han J, Zhou Q, Li X, He J, Han Y, Jie H, He Y, Sun E. Novel function of hydroxychloroquine: down regulation of T follicular helper cells in collagen-induced arthritis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;97:838–843. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.10.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Espinosa E, Valitutti S, Laroche M, Laurent C, Apoil PA, Hermine O, Lavit M, Paul C, Bulai Livideanu C. Hydroxychloroquine as a novel therapeutic approach in mast cell activation diseases. Clin Immunol. 2018;194:75–79. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2018.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Gao W, Wang Z, Li W, Li Y, Liu M. Biomarkers and biologics related with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;122:110646. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Calabrese L, Malvaso D, Coscarella G, Antonelli F, D’Amore A, Gori N, Rubegni P, Peris K, Chiricozzi A. Therapeutic potential of IL-1 antagonism in hidradenitis suppurativa. Biomolecules. 2024;14:175. doi: 10.3390/biom14020175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Yahyazadeh S, Esmaeil N, Shaygannejad V, Mirmosayyeb O. Comparison of follicular T helper cells, monocytes, and T cells priming between newly diagnosed and rituximab-treated MS patients and healthy controls. Res Pharm Sci. 2022;17:315–323. doi: 10.4103/1735-5362.343085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Kubo M. T follicular helper and TH2 cells in allergic responses. Allergol Int. 2017;66:377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2017.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Nebert DW. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR): “pioneer member” of the basic-helix/loop/helix per-Arnt-sim (bHLH/PAS) family of “sensors” of foreign and endogenous signals. Prog Lipid Res. 2017;67:38–57. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2017.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Esser C, Rannug A. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor in barrier organ physiology, immunology, and toxicology. Pharmacol Rev. 2015;67:259–279. doi: 10.1124/pr.114.009001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Quintana FJ, Sherr DH. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor control of adaptive immunity. Pharmacol Rev. 2013;65:1148–1161. doi: 10.1124/pr.113.007823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Desai SR, Stein Gold L, Cameron MC, Golant A, Lewitt GM, Bruno MJ, Martin G, Brown PM, Rubenstein DS, Butners V, et al. Tapinarof cream 1% once daily for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: case photography of clinical outcomes from three phase 3 trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2023;13:2443–2460. doi: 10.1007/s13555-023-01008-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Fernández-Gallego N, Sánchez-Madrid F, Cibrian D. Role of AHR ligands in skin homeostasis and cutaneous inflammation. Cells. 2021;10:3176. doi: 10.3390/cells10113176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Napolitano M, Fabbrocini G, Martora F, Picone V, Morelli P, Patruno C. Role of aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation in inflammatory chronic skin diseases. Cells. 2021;10:3559. doi: 10.3390/cells10123559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Laouini D, Elkhal A, Yalcindag A, Kawamoto S, Oettgen H, Geha RS. COX-2 inhibition enhances the TH2 immune response to epicutaneous sensitization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;116:390–396. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.03.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Hirata T, Narumiya S. Prostanoids as regulators of innate and adaptive immunity. Adv Immunol. 2012;116:143–174. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394300-2.00005-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Dec M, Arasiewicz H. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor role in chronic inflammatory skin diseases: a narrative review. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2024;41:9–19. doi: 10.5114/ada.2023.135617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Boniface K, Bak-Jensen KS, Li Y, Blumenschein WM, McGeachy MJ, McClanahan TK, McKenzie BS, Kastelein RA, Cua DJ, de Waal Malefyt R. Prostaglandin E2 regulates Th17 cell differentiation and function through cyclic AMP and EP2/EP4 receptor signaling. J Exp Med. 2009;206:535–548. doi: 10.1084/jem.20082293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Silverberg JI, French LE, Warren RB, Strober B, Kjøller K, Sommer MO, Andres P, Felding J, Weiss A, Tutkunkardas D, et al. Pharmacology of orismilast, a potent and selective PDE4 inhibitor. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023;37:721–729. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Schafer PH, Adams M, Horan G, Truzzi F, Marconi A, Pincelli C. Apremilast normalizes gene expression of inflammatory mediators in human keratinocytes and reduces antigen-induced atopic dermatitis in mice. Drugs R D. 2019;19:329–338. doi: 10.1007/s40268-019-00284-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Bianchi L, Del Duca E, Romanelli M, Saraceno R, Chimenti S, Chiricozzi A. Pharmacodynamic assessment of apremilast for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2016;12:1121–1128. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2016.1206886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Schafer PH, Parton A, Gandhi AK, Capone L, Adams M, Wu L, Bartlett JB, Loveland MA, Gilhar A, Cheung YF, et al. Apremilast, a cAMP phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, demonstrates anti-inflammatory activity in vitro and in a model of psoriasis. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;159:842–855. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00559.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Carmona-Rocha E, Rusiñol L, Puig L. New and emerging oral/topical small-molecule treatments for psoriasis. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16:239. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16020239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.McLornan DP, Pope JE, Gotlib J, Harrison CN. Current and future status of JAK inhibitors. Lancet. 2021;398:803–816. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00438-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Tanaka Y, Luo Y, O’Shea JJ, Nakayamada S. Janus kinase-targeting therapies in rheumatology: a mechanisms-based approach. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022;18:133–145. doi: 10.1038/s41584-021-00726-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Martin DA, Telliez JB, Pleasic-Williams S, Zhang Y, Tierney B, Blatnik M, Gale JD, Banfield C, Zhou Y, Lejeune A, et al. Target occupancy and functional inhibition of JAK3 and TEC family kinases by ritlecitinib in healthy adults: an open-label, phase 1 study. J Clin Pharmacol. 2024;64:67–79. doi: 10.1002/jcph.2347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.A phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lutikizumab (ABT-981) in adult subjects with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa who have failed anti-TNF therapy: amended protocol to include a lutikizumab open-label sub-study in subjects naïve to biologic therapy [Internet] [accessed on 22 March 2024]. Available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05139602.
- 121.Fleischmann RM, Bliddal H, Blanco FJ, Schnitzer TJ, Peterfy C, Chen S, Wang L, Feng S, Conaghan PG, Berenbaum F, et al. A phase II trial of lutikizumab, an anti-interleukin-1α/β dual variable domain immunoglobulin, in knee osteoarthritis patients with synovitis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71:1056–1069. doi: 10.1002/art.40840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Teufel LU, Arts RJW, Netea MG, Dinarello CA, Joosten LA. IL-1 family cytokines as drivers and inhibitors of trained immunity. Cytokine. 2022;150:155773. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2021.155773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Tuttle J, Drescher E, Simón-Campos JA, Emery P, Greenwald M, Kivitz A, Rha H, Yachi P, Kiley C, Nirula A. A phase 2 trial of peresolimab for adults with rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:1853–1862. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2209856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Scully M, Moulton VR, Clarke S, Ota T, Chen D, Liva S, Cunningham M, Ghorayeb E, Yang D, Macleod A, et al., editors. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of JNJ-67484703 in adult patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: design of a phase 2a study; 32nd EADV Congress 2023; 2023 Oct 10-14; Berlin, Germany. Lugano, Switzerland: EADV; 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 125.Gilfillan AM, Rivera J. The tyrosine kinase network regulating mast cell activation. Immunol Rev. 2009;228:149–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00742.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Aoki Y, Isselbacher KJ, Pillai S. Bruton tyrosine kinase is tyrosine phosphorylated and activated in pre-B lymphocytes and receptor-ligated B cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:10606–10609. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.22.10606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Neys SFH, Hendriks RW, Corneth OBJ. Targeting Bruton’s tyrosine kinase in inflammatory and autoimmune pathologies. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:668131. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.668131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Ellmeier W, Abramova A, Schebesta A. Tec family kinases: regulation of FcεRI-mediated mast-cell activation. FEBS J. 2011;278:1990–2000. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08073.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Xing Y, Chu KA, Wadhwa J, Chen W, Zhu J, Bradshaw JM, Shu J, Foulke MC, Loewenstein N, Nunn P, et al. Preclinical mechanisms of topical PRN473, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in immune-mediated skin disease models. Immunohorizons. 2021;5:581–589. doi: 10.4049/immunohorizons.2100063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Mendes-Bastos P, Brasileiro A, Kolkhir P, Frischbutter S, Scheffel J, Moñino-Romero S, Maurer M. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibition-an emerging therapeutic strategy in immune-mediated dermatological conditions. Allergy. 2022;77:2355–2366. doi: 10.1111/all.15261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Vinuesa CG, Linterman MA, Yu D, MacLennan ICM. Follicular helper T cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2016;34:335–368. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-041015-055605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Spolski R, Leonard WJ. Interleukin-21: a double-edged sword with therapeutic potential. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13:379–395. doi: 10.1038/nrd4296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Caprioli F, Sarra M, Caruso R, Stolfi C, Fina D, Sica G, MacDonald TT, Pallone F, Monteleone G. Autocrine regulation of IL-21 production in human T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2008;180:1800–1807. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.3.1800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Mesas-Fernández A, Bodner E, Hilke FJ, Meier K, Ghoreschi K, Solimani F. Interleukin-21 in autoimmune and inflammatory skin diseases. Eur J Immunol. 2023;53:e2250075. doi: 10.1002/eji.202250075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Brunner PM, Pavel AB, Khattri S, Leonard A, Malik K, Rose S, Jim On S, Vekaria AS, Traidl-Hoffmann C, Singer GK, et al. Baseline IL-22 expression in patients with atopic dermatitis stratifies tissue responses to fezakinumab. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143:142–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.07.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Nakashima C, Otsuka A, Kabashima K. Interleukin-31 and interleukin-31 receptor: new therapeutic targets for atopic dermatitis. Exp Dermatol. 2018;27:327–331. doi: 10.1111/exd.13533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Lé AM, Torres T. OX40-OX40L inhibition for the treatment of atopic dermatitis-focus on rocatinlimab and amlitelimab. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:2753. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14122753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Fu N, Xie F, Sun Z, Wang Q. The OX40/OX40L axis regulates T follicular helper cell differentiation: implications for autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol. 2021;12:670637. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.670637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Khoryati L, Pham MN, Sherve M, Kumari S, Cook K, Pearson J, Bogdani M, Campbell DJ, Gavin MA. An IL-2 mutein engineered to promote expansion of regulatory T cells arrests ongoing autoimmunity in mice. Sci Immunol. 2020;5:eaba5264. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aba5264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Richmond JM, Strassner JP, Zapata L, Jr, Garg M, Riding RL, Refat MA, Fan X, Azzolino V, Tovar-Garza A, Tsurushita N, et al. Antibody blockade of IL-15 signaling has the potential to durably reverse vitiligo. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10:eaam7710. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aam7710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Zhu LN, Hou HM, Wang S, Zhang S, Wang GG, Guo ZY, Wu J. FcRn inhibitors: a novel option for the treatment of myasthenia gravis. Neural Regen Res. 2023;18:1637–1644. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.363824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Maho-Vaillant M, Sips M, Golinski ML, Vidarsson G, Goebeler M, Stoevesandt J, Bata-Csörgő Z, Balbino B, Verheesen P, Joly P, et al. FcRn antagonism leads to a decrease of desmoglein-specific B cells: secondary analysis of a phase 2 study of efgartigimod in pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. Front Immunol. 2022;13:863095. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.863095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Guttman-Yassky E, Renert-Yuval Y, Bares J, Chima M, Hawkes JE, Gilleaudeau P, Sullivan-Whalen M, Singer GK, Garcet S, Pavel AB, et al. Phase 2a randomized clinical trial of dupilumab (anti-IL-4Rα) for alopecia areata patients. Allergy. 2022;77:897–906. doi: 10.1111/all.15071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Datsi A, Steinhoff M, Ahmad F, Alam M, Buddenkotte J. Interleukin-31: the “itchy” cytokine in inflammation and therapy. Allergy. 2021;76:2982–2997. doi: 10.1111/all.14791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Langenberg C, Hingorani AD, Whitty CJM. Biological and functional multimorbidity-from mechanisms to management. Nat Med. 2023;29:1649–1657. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02420-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


