Table 3.

Percentage of IPS Clients With Significant Improvement by Subgroups.

Measure	IPS in subgroup: percentage improved		IPS vs. non-IPS in subgroup: odds ratio (standard logistic regression)
	%	n	Controlling for matching variables	Controlling for matching variables + baseline MLT, SOFAS
At least one outcome measure
Not engaged in work or study and looking for work	85.4	111	2.035*	2.029*
Indigenous	78.9	41	1.642	1.468
Male	85.7	156	1.713*	1.570
Female	78.9	273	1.302	1.142
Quality of life (MLT)
Not engaged in work or study and looking for work	60.0	78	1.484	1.477
Indigenous	61.5	32	1.657	1.544
Male	63.7	116	1.584**	1.556*
Female	55.5	192	1.246	1.210
Psychosocial functioning (SOFAS)
Not engaged in work or study and looking for work	56.9	74	1.759*	1.936*
Indigenous	44.2	23	1.217	0.770
Male	51.7	94	1.451*	1.322
Female	59.3	205	1.357*	1.107
Psychological distress (K10)
Not engaged in work or study and looking for work	36.9	48	0.733	0.734
Indigenous	42.3	22	2.277*	2.693*
Male	41.8	76	0.979	0.971
Female	38.4	133	1.124	1.130

^**Significant at P < .01. *Significant at P < .05.