Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 28;21(14):2851–2861. doi: 10.7150/ijms.103186

Table 5.

Association between SDF-1/CXCR4 genotypes and Pre-ESRD disease.

Variable Non-diabetic kidney disease (N=335) Pre-ESRD (N=80) AOR (95% CI) p value
SDF-1
rs1801157
Additive model
GG 175 (52.2%) 39 (48.7%) 1.000 (reference)
GA 139 (41.5%) 37 (46.3%) 1.163 (0.328-4.123) p=0.815
AA 21 (6.3%) 4 (5.0%) 0.715 (0.193-2.640) p=0.614
Dominant model
GG 175 (52.2%) 39 (48.7%) 1.000 (reference)
GA+AA 160 (47.8%) 41 (51.3%) 0.964 (0.276-3.364) p=0.954
SDF-1
rs2297630
Additive model
GG 267 (79.7%) 65 (81.3%) 1.000 (reference)
GA 60 (17.9%) 13 (16.3%) 0.463 (0.054-3.987) p=0.483
AA 8 (2.4%) 2 (2.5%) 0.540 (0.085-3.428) p=0.514
Dominant model
GG 267 (79.7%) 65 (81.3%) 1.000 (reference)
GA+AA 68 (20.3%) 15 (18.8%) 0.440 (0.051-3.772) p=0.454
SDF-1
rs2839693
Additive model
CC 263 (78.5%) 58 (72.5%) 1.000 (reference)
CT 68 (20.3%) 22 (27.5%) 1.324 (0.345-5.083) p=0.682
TT 4 (1.2%) 0 (0.0%) --- ---
Dominant model
CC 263 (78.5%) 58 (72.5%) 1.000 (reference)
CT+TT 72 (21.5%) 22 (27.5%) 1.311 (0.342-5.024) p=0.693
SDF-1
rs266085
Additive model
TT 119 (35.5%) 18 (22.5%) 1.000 (reference)
TC 166 (49.6%) 47 (58.8%) 2.106 (1.090-4.069) p=0.027
CC 50 (14.9%) 15 (18.7%) 2.208 (0.937-5.204) p=0.070
Dominant model
TT 119 (35.5%) 18 (22.5%) 1.000 (reference)
TC+CC 216 (64.5%) 62 (77.5%) 2.130 (1.130-4.014) p=0.019
CXCR4
rs2228014
Additive model
CC 257 (76.7%) 63 (78.8%) 1.000 (reference)
CT 70 (20.9%) 16 (20.0%) 1.103 (0.223-5.456) p=0.905
TT 8 (2.4%) 1 (1.3%) 0.284 (0.029-2.786) p=0.280
Dominant model
CC 257 (76.7%) 63 (78.8%) 1.000 (reference)
CT+TT 78 (23.3%) 17 (21.3%) 0.875 (0.184-4.165) p=0.867
CXCR4
rs6430612
Additive model
CC 310 (92.5%) 77 (96.3%) 1.000 (reference)
CT 25 (7.5%) 3 (3.7%) 1.462 (0.132-16.189) p=0.757
TT 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) --- ---
Dominant model
CC 310 (92.5%) 77 (96.3%) 1.000 (reference)
CT+TT 25 (7.5%) 3 (3.7%) 1.462 (0.132-16.189) p=0.757

The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with their 95% confidence intervals were estimated by multiple logistic regression models.