Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 29;5(12):100714. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100714

Table 2.

Concordance Between RET-FISH and Other Molecular Techniques Performed on Lung Cancer Reported in the Literature: Cases Initially Screened by Another Method Where FISH Was Used as a Confirmatory/Validation Technique for the Chosen Screening Technique

Study Number of RET-FISH+ Samples Reported Number of RET-FISH+ Samples Compared With Other Techniques Number and % of Concordant Samples Between FISH and Other Techniques
Takeuchi et al.,36 2021 34 34 4 (100) [RT-PCR]
30 (100) [RNA-seq]
Yang et al.,23 2021 27 lung cancers (subset of the 171 samples with a RET structural variant) 27 27 (100) [DNA-NGS]
25 (88.9) [RNA-seq]
Feng et al.,49 2022 25 25 25 (100) [RNA-seq]
Shang et al.,47 2019 20 20 20 (100) [RT-qPCR]
Yoh et al.,51 2017 19 19 19 (100) [RT-PCR]
Lira et al.,45 2014 15 15 15 (100) [NanoString]
Pan et al.,39 2014 15 15 15 (100) [RT-PCR]
Lee et al.,22 2015 14 14 14 (100) [NanoString]
Wang et al.,14 2012 13 13 13 (100) [RT-PCR]
Song et al.,37 2016 11 11 11 (100) [RT-PCR]
11 (100) [RNA-seq]
Chen et al.,48 2020 10 10 10 (100) [DNA-NGS]
Radonic et al.,30 2021 9 9 9 (100) [RNA-seq]
Kim et al.,40 2015 9 9 9 (100) [RT-PCR]
Kohno et al.,11 2012 6 6 6 (100) [RT-PCR]
Tanaka et al.,43 2017 4 4 4 (100) [RT-PCR]
Sokolova et al.,52 2020 3 3 3 (100) [validated method]
Sasaki et al.,35 2012 2 2 2 (100) [RT-PCR]
Reguart et al.,42 2017 2 2 2 (100) [NanoString]
Song et al.,41 2017 2 2 2 (100) [RT-PCR]
Ambrosini-Spaltro et al.,50 2022 2 2 2 (100) [RNA-seq]
Suehara et al.,44 2012 1 1 1 (100) [NanoString]
Borrelli et al.,38 2013 1 1 1 (100) [RT-PCR]
Velizheva et al.,46 2018 1 1 1 (100) [RNA-seq]

DNA-NGS, DNA next generation sequencing; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; RNA-seq, RNA-sequencing; RT-PCR, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction.