Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2024 Oct 7;16(10):e70995. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70995

Acral Extragenital Lichen Sclerosus and Its Dermoscopic Findings

Francisco Javier Alvarez-Rubio 1,, Víctor Manuel Tarango-Martinez 1
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC11539540  PMID: 39507133

Abstract

Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder that predominantly affects the genital region of postmenopausal women, often resulting in significant morbidity due to pruritus and pain. Extragenital manifestations are rare and can present a diagnostic challenge. We report a case of a 65-year-old female presenting with white papules and plaques, some with a cribriform appearance, in an acral distribution. We detail the dermoscopic findings observed and provide a review of the relevant published literature on this topic.

Keywords: acral extragenital lichen sclerosus, dermatology, dermoscopy, extragenital lichen sclerosus, lichen sclerosus

Introduction

Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic inflammatory mucocutaneous disorder, typically presenting as white, atrophic patches or plaques on the vulva, perineum, or prepuce. A less common extragenital form may involve regions such as the upper trunk, neck, shoulders, and wrists. Histopathologically, it is characterized by thinning of the epidermis, basal cell degeneration, band-like lymphocytic infiltrate, and replacement of the normal papillary dermis with homogenized collagen [1, 2]. In its early stages, extragenital LS may resemble other dermatoses, such as morphea, lichen planus, chronic eczema, vitiligo, and flat warts, due to the absence of the hallmark features of sclerosis and atrophy, which become more pronounced as the disease advances [3]. Dermoscopy has emerged as an essential tool for diagnosing a wide range of dermatologic conditions. Herein, we present a case of LS with exclusive extragenital involvement, characterized by an acral distribution and notable dermoscopic findings.

Case presentation

A 65-year-old woman presented to our clinic with a six-month history of what she described as an 'allergy' in her hands and feet, accompanied by mild pruritus. Physical examination revealed numerous yellowish-white papules and plaques, some with comedo-like openings (cribriform appearance) and mild infiltration, located on the volar aspects of the wrists and anterior ankles (Figure 1). No abnormalities were found on the scalp, mucous membranes, or nails.

Figure 1. Clinical findings.

Figure 1

Papules and plaques with comedo-like openings, yellowish and white-colored on the anterior side of right (A) and left (B) wrist, and right (C) and left ankle; close up of left ankle (E).

The differential diagnoses included morphea, acrokeratosis verruciformis of Hopf, lichen planus, and extragenital LS. The dermoscopic evaluation revealed white, structureless areas with comedo-like openings (Figure 2). 

Figure 2. Dermoscopy findings .

Figure 2

Polarized dermoscopy shows structureless white areas (red arrows) with comedo-like openings (blue arrows).

An incisional biopsy was performed, and the histopathological report described an acanthotic epidermis with orthokeratotic hyperkeratosis, follicular plugs, a lichenoid lymphoid infiltrate adjacent to the basal membrane, and homogenized collagen in the papillary dermis, consistent with a diagnosis of extragenital LS. Clobetasol 0.05% cream was initiated twice daily for four weeks, resulting in satisfactory clinical improvement, with no recurrences observed after eight months of follow-up.

Discussion

Lichen sclerosus typically manifests in the genital region; however, 15% to 20% of cases involve extragenital sites, and only 6% present exclusively in extragenital locations [4]. Although precise prevalence data are lacking, women are more frequently affected than men, with a reported female-to-male ratio ranging from 3:1 to 10:1 [5]. The most commonly involved extragenital areas include the upper trunk and proximal extremities, where asymptomatic opalescent white papules and plaques gradually develop sclerosis and atrophy [6]. In the early stages, comedo-like openings may be observed, although these typically regress over time [3].

Although the exact etiology of LS remains unclear, several contributing factors have been identified, including genetic predisposition (HLA-DQ7), autoimmune conditions (such as autoimmune thyroid disease), infectious agents (e.g., Borrelia burgdorferi, Epstein-Barr virus, hepatitis C virus, human papillomavirus), as well as hormonal, local, and traumatic influences (e.g., lack of circumcision in men, friction, humidity, urine exposure). Histologically, early-stage LS is characterized by epidermal acanthosis with posterior atrophy, often accompanied by orthokeratotic hyperkeratosis and follicular plugs, lymphocytic and mononuclear cell infiltrates, and degeneration of the basal layer [2]. Ultrapotent topical corticosteroids are the first-line treatment [7].

Dermoscopy typically reveals white, structureless areas and comedo-like openings (follicular plugs) [8]. Other possible findings include scales, a pseudo-pigment pattern, and chrysalis-like structures. Comedo-like openings are generally seen only in the early stages of extragenital LS (within the first 1.5 years), while chrysalis-type structures tend to appear in more advanced stages [4, 9]. Extragenital LS and morphea can be clinically similar; however, morphea shows white clouds crossed by spreading telangiectasia on dermoscopy [10].

Conclusions

Dermoscopy is a valuable diagnostic tool for multiple skin conditions, emphasizing the need to further expand knowledge in this field. A deeper understanding of dermoscopic features across various dermatologic pathologies can significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy. In cases of extragenital LS, dermoscopy offers crucial insights by revealing characteristic findings, such as white structureless areas and comedo-like openings. 

Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Francisco Javier Alvarez-Rubio, Víctor Manuel Tarango-Martinez

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Francisco Javier Alvarez-Rubio, Víctor Manuel Tarango-Martinez

Drafting of the manuscript:  Francisco Javier Alvarez-Rubio, Víctor Manuel Tarango-Martinez

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Francisco Javier Alvarez-Rubio, Víctor Manuel Tarango-Martinez

Supervision:  Francisco Javier Alvarez-Rubio

References

  • 1.Diagnosis and treatment of lichen sclerosus: an update. Fistarol SK, Itin PH. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2013;14:27–47. doi: 10.1007/s40257-012-0006-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Structured analysis of histopathological characteristics of vulvar lichen sclerosus in a juvenile population. Morrel B, Ewing-Graham PC, van der Avoort IA, Pasmans SG, Damman J. Hum Pathol. 2020;106:23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2020.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Extragenital lichen sclerosus: a comprehensive review of clinical features and treatment. Burshtein A, Burshtein J, Rekhtman S. Arch Dermatol Res. 2023;315:339–346. doi: 10.1007/s00403-022-02397-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Extragenital lichen sclerosus: a comprehensive review. Arif T, Fatima R, Sami M. Australas J Dermatol. 2022;63:452–462. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Evidence-based (S3) guideline on (anogenital) lichen sclerosus. Kirtschig G, Becker K, Günthert A, et al. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29:0–43. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.A case of acral lichen sclerosus et atrophicus. Heibel HD, Styles AR, Cockerell CJ. JAAD Case Rep. 2020;8:26–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2020.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and treatment of lichen sclerosus: a systematic review. Fergus KB, Lee AW, Baradaran N, et al. Urology. 2020;135:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dermoscopy of extragenital lichen sclerosus. Garrido-Ríos AA, Alvarez-Garrido H, Sanz-Muñoz C, Aragoneses-Fraile H, Manchado-López P, Miranda-Romero A. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:1468. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dermoscopic patterns in lichen sclerosus: a report of three cases. Ankad BS, Beergouder SL. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2015;6:237–240. doi: 10.4103/2229-5178.156450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Diagnostic usefulness of dermatoscopy in differentiating lichen sclerous et atrophicus from morphea. Shim WH, Jwa SW, Song M, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66:690–691. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.06.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES