Abstract
Background
Phenibut (β-phenyl-γ-aminobutyric acid) is an analog of the neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Like abapentin and pregabalin, it inhibits α2-δ–subunits of voltage-dependent presynaptic calcium channels. The potential harm resulting from the use of these gabapentinoids is currently a matter of debate.
Methods
This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective literature search and on cases reported to the Giftinformationszentrum-Nord (GIZ-Nord), a poison information center at the University of Göttingen, Germany.
Results
Phenibut is a prescription drug in Russia but its production, possession, use, trafficking, or administration is illegal in Germany. The phenibut toxicity syndrome resembles that of gabapentinoids and GABA mimetics: benzodiazepine-like withdrawal symptoms including epileptic seizures, delirium and paradoxical activation have been described, as have cases of abuse and dependence. A few cases of use in the setting of multidrug abuse, and of phenibut-related death, have been described to date in the USA. The GIZ-Nord received 17 inquiries about phenibut, 55 about gabapentin, and 126 about pregabalin over the period 2008–2022. Over the same period, the GIZ-Nord was informed of 1207 cases involving Z substances and 4324 involving benzodiazepines. In the majority of the registered intoxications, including those with phenibut, the symptoms were mild. Overdoses of phenibut (2–100 g) were reported in 15 of the 17 cases; 8 of the persons who had taken an overdose were somnolent. In such cases, observation in intensive care was recommended. Respiratory depression or coma was not encountered in any case, not even in the patient who had taken 100 g of phenibut.
Conclusion
Phenibut causes symptoms resembling those of gabapentinoid and benzodiazepine use. There have been reports of phenibut use in combination with other psychotropic drugs; in particular, its use together with opiates could increase the risk of coma and respiratory depression. No deaths due to phenibut intoxication have been published in Germany or elsewhere in Western Europe, although such cases may have been overlooked, as this drug is still largely unknown to Western medicine.
CME plus+
This article has been certified by the North Rhine Academy for Continuing Medical Education. The questions on this article can be found at http://daebl.de/RY95. The submission deadline is 04.04.2025.
Participation is possible at cme.aerztebatt.de
This article would like to raise awareness of a psychotropic substance, hitherto virtually unknown in Germany and Western Europe, that can be bought online as a food supplement in capsule and powder form: phenibut (β-phenyl-γ-aminobutyric acid) (1, 2), a lipophilic analog of the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) (Table, e1, e2), is touted in Western countries on the bodybuilding scene and the Internet as a food supplement with euphoria-inducing and relaxant effects, but which at lower doses (250–500 mg) also has performance-enhancing effects (street names: e.g., “the happy drug,” “the smart pill”). It originated in Russia and has been medically prescribed in former Soviet Union countries since the early 1960s in daily doses of between 250 mg and 2 g as a nootropic (in low doses) as well as a drug for somatoform symptoms of anxiety, sleep disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, and mild to moderate alcohol withdrawal symptoms (1, 2).
Table. Pharmacotoxicology of the gabapentinoids*1 available in Germany (1–4).
| Gabapentinoid (GPT) | First approved | Indicationsby region | Tmax | Bioavail-ability | T1/2 | KD | Tolerability | Safety | Toxicological doses*2 |
Phenibut (e1)![]() Therapeutic daily doses: 250–2000 mg |
1965 (former Soviet Union) |
Former Soviet Union countries: nootropic, alcohol withdrawal symptoms, various neurotic symptoms, anxiolysis, insomnia, calming/sedation, muscle relaxation, analgesia, epilepsy |
3–4 h | ca. 65% | 5–6 h | 21 ± 7 μM (weakest compound of all GPT) (1, 2) |
Side effects (1, 2)*3 |
Deaths due to high overdoses not known;if any, then very rarely in combination with sedatives or opioids (respiratory suppression) | Not specified |
Gabapentin (e1)![]() Therapeutic daily doses: 100–3600 mg |
1994 (USA) |
Most countries: focal epilepsywith or without secondary generalization, neuropathic pain (diabetic neuropathy, post-zoster neuralgia, phantom pain) |
3–4 h | Dose-dependent, intestinal saturation mechanism | 5–6 h | 0.05 ± 0.01 μM (1, 2) |
Side effects (3, 4)*3 |
Deaths dueto high overdoses extremely rare—but more probable in combination with sedatives or opioids (aggravation of respiratory depression) | 5 g |
Pregabalin (e1)![]() Therapeutic daily doses: 25–600 mg |
2004 (USA) |
Most countries: focal epilepsywith and without secondary generalization, neuropathic pain (diabetic neuropathy, post-zoster neuralgia, phantom pain); Europe: generalized anxiety disorder; USA: fibromyalgia |
≤ 1 h | > 90% | 6–7 h | Similar to gabapentin, but dissociates from the α2-δ1 and α2-δ2 subunits in voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC) more slowly than gabapentin (4) | Side effects (3, 4)*3 |
Deaths dueto high overdoses rare—but more probable in combination with sedatives or opioids (aggravation of respiratory depression) | 10 mg/kg body weight |
*1 Subject to individual regulations in other countries
*2 Working Group I (Arbeitsgruppe, AG-I) of the German speaking Society of Clinical Toxicology (Gesellschaft für Klinische Toxikologie, GfKT), GfKT monographs on gabapentin and pregabalin, 04/2015 (personal communication: Prof. Andreas Schaper)
*3 Somnolence, sedation, concentration and word-retrieval disorder, impaired reaction time, dizziness, paradoxical irritability and psychomotor agitation, paradoxical anxiety and inner agitation, nausea; synergy with sedatives, hypnotics, and opioids; coma and respiratory depression possible in the case of overdose; if used long term: tolerance development, physical and possibly psychological dependence, transaminase increase; if discontinued abruptly: withdrawal syndrome, possibly epileptic seizure, delirium
KD: dissociation constants for α2-δ1/2 subunits; Tmax: the time from oral use to the time the maximum concentration in blood is reached;
T1/2: elimination half-life
In the chiral molecule, only (R)-phenibut is pharmacologically active (e2). Since the 1970s, (R)-phenibut has been considered a GABA-B receptor agonist and as significantly weaker than baclofen (dissociation constants [KD] at the GABA-B receptor for [R]-phenibut versus baclofen: 92 ± 3 μM versus 6 ± 1 3 μM [1, 2]). Only in 2015 was it recognized that (R)-phenibut, like gabapentin und pregabalin, also inhibits α2-δ subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels (2–5, e3, e4). However, its affinity to these subunits (KD= 21 ± 7 µM) is lower compared to that of gabapentin (KD= 0.05 ± 0.01 µM), the weakest gabapentinoid used clinically to date (Table) (2, e5). The Russian literature additionally describes stimulation of the dopaminergic system and beta-phenethylamine (PEA) inhibition (1). PEA is a trace amine in the intracellular synthesis of biogenic amines such as dopamine, noradrenaline, and serotonin, and furthermore acts as an agonist on trace amine-associated receptor (TAAR)-1, which is also activated by amphetamine (e6). Phenibut is virtually unaffected by hepatic metabolism and is excreted unchanged (5, e7–e9).
Since phenibut belongs to the substance class of gabapentinoids (Box 1), the representatives of which, gabapentin and pregabalin, are increasingly discussed with regard to their potential for harm (3–6), we attempt to classify phenibut accordingly (Box 1).
Box 1. Definition of the gabapentinoid substance class.
From a pharmacological perspective, gabapentinoids (GPT) (in Germany, gabapentin and pregabalin) are defined by their capacity to bind to the α2-δ subunits of presynaptic voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC) and inhibit their function. They presynaptically prevent exocytosis and thus the release of neurotransmitters from the vesicles of the VGCC into the synaptic cleft. Since the release of neurotransmitters depends mainly on the neuronal activity of the presynaptic neuron (and also on the density of activated VGCC in the presynapse), a filtering of information transfer occurs. Thus, for example, excitatory synapses slow down neuronal activity in the postsynaptic neuron (4, e5, e10). Another as yet under-researched effect of gabapentin and pregabalin is their capacity to increase the extrasynaptic (“ambient”) extracellular GABA concentration in brain tissue in a dose-dependent manner (e5). Gabapentin also increases the expression of extrasynaptic GABA-A receptors in the hippocampus and cerebellum (e11). With regard to the increase in ambient GABA, an effect on cellular GABA synthesis and/or GABA transporters is assumed (e5).
Methods
This review article is based on a literature search in the PubMed database. The following search terms were used: “phenibut,” “toxicity,” “safety,” “tolerability,” “dependence,” “withdrawal,” “fatalities,” “death,” “intoxication,” “asphyxia,” “hypoxia,” “respiratory depression,” “review.” The search period covered studies that appeared up to 11.11.2023. All studies and reports providing information on the clinical effect, safety, and tolerability of phenibut were included. We also searched the Internet via Google and evaluated inquiries to the Giftinformationszentrum-Nord (GIZ-Nord), a poison information center at the University of Göttingen, Germany, between 2008 and 2022 regarding phenibut, gabapentin, pregabalin, benzodiazepines, and other GABA mimetics (GABA effect enhancers).
Results
We were unable to find any prospective or randomized controlled studies. The following information on phenibut is based on three retrospective epidemiological studies (5, 7, 8), five case reports (9, e7, e8, e12), one case series (10), six narrative reviews (1, 2, 11–13, e9), and one systematic review, for which only retrospective studies and case studies were considered (14).
The legality of phenibut
In Germany (as well as outside the former Soviet Union), phenibut is not approved as a drug and, as a food supplement, is controlled under the German New Psychoactive Substances Act (Neue-psychoaktive-Stoffe-Gesetz, NpSG) ([15, e13], Appendix 1.1–1.2. “Compounds derived from 2-phenethylamine”). However, so far, this regulation has not prevented the easy online procurement of phenibut. In actual fact, phenibut is banned. In accordance with the NpSG, the ban includes its: production, possession, use, trafficking, or administration. Exceptions can be approved for technical and scientific purposes as well as for use by a public authority. Phenibut is also illegal in Australia, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, Hungary, and Lithuania (15).
Pharmacovigilance, toxidrome, and mortality
In Germany, phenibut has been made subject to pharmacovigilance (e13). To date, there have been no publications in German-speaking countries regarding emergency cases, deaths, or addiction disorders associated with phenibut. The majority of reports come from Russian-speaking countries (1, 2) and the USA (5, 7–14, e6–e9, e12). Oral overdoses (up to 50 g = 25-fold overdose) cause symptoms that are also typically known in overdoses of GABA mimetic sedatives and hypnotics (in particular, somnolence to coma, falls, respiratory depression requiring intubation [1, 2, 7, 14]). The recommended approach in phenibut intoxication is derived from these (Box 2). As with benzodiazepines and other GABA mimetics, paradoxical cases involving panic attacks, acute psychoses, and severe psychomotor agitation have been described (1, 2, 11).
Box 2. Approach in phenibut intoxication.
The approach—as with other GABA-mimetic substances such as alcohol, baclofen, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, Z substances, clomethiazole, chloraldurate, gabapentin, and pregabalin—depends on the clinical symptoms: In the case of quantitative impairment of consciousness, respiratory depression, signs of multidrug intoxication, or cardiac arrhythmias, (intensive) medical monitoring should be carried out and mechanical ventilation should be at hand for 12 h. There is no specific antidote. There are no descriptions of clinical experience with flumazenil, which specifically blocks the benzodiazepine binding site of the GABA-A receptor as a reversible, competitive antagonist (e14). In the case of successful intravenous flumazenil administration, potential rebound phenomena should be expected within the subsequent 12 h (T1/2 of phenibut in the Table) due to the short elimination half-life (T1/2) of flumazenil (60 min).
Between 2009 and 2019, 1320 cases of intoxication (including three deaths) involving phenibut were reported in the USA. Typical symptoms included tachycardia, nausea, stomach cramps, drowsiness, coma, confusion, hallucinations, and severe psychomotor agitation. Mostly young adults were affected. The number of cases of this kind started to rise in 2015 (7). According to a recent study, approximately 50% of registered cases of intoxication involving phenibut required intubation (14). According to that study, phenibut was one element in multidrug use (7, 14). In a few isolated cases, dependent concomitant use of phenibut in patients prescribed opiates has been described (e12). A US online search recently revealed that drug addicts in the USA are now using phenibut—much in the same way as other gabapentinoids (3, 6)—to manage benzodiazepine and opiate withdrawal symptoms (8).
We were able to find quantitative values in three toxicological post-mortem analyses in which phenibut was identified as part of multidrug use, but was not deemed to be responsible for death: phenibut concentrations of up to 64 mg/L were measured in femoral blood (9, 10). In the few deaths described in association with phenibut, concomitant use of various substances, including alcohol and opiates, was documented (7, 9, 10). We were unable to find any post-mortem analyses in which phenibut alone was detected or declared as the cause of death.
Own Internet research
There are reports of enhanced physical and mental performance, euphoria, and alleviation of alcohol and opiate withdrawal symptoms with phenibut. Users report quantities of between 2 and 5 g of phenibut to alleviate withdrawal symptoms of this kind (1 g of this substance currently costs around 1 euro).
Dependence and abuse, withdrawal syndrome and tolerability
Similar to benzodiazepines, gabapentin, and pregabalin, there are reports for phenibut of dependence and withdrawal symptoms, including withdrawal-related epileptic seizures and delirium following abrupt discontinuation of previously regular use (1, 2, 8, 12). Furthermore, phenibut, like other gabapentinoids (e15, e16) and unlike benzodiazepines (e16, e17), appears to have low toxicity and good tolerability (1, 2, 6, 8). Box 3 shows experience with and recommendations on the treatment of phenibut withdrawal syndrome.
Box 3. Treatment of phenibut withdrawal syndrome.
Based on the long-known agonistic effect of (R)-phenibut on the GABA-B receptor (1), case reports with baclofen are available to date: 10 mg every 8 h improved phenibut withdrawal symptoms (16). If this is unable to sufficiently treat withdrawal symptoms, benzodiazepines may be necessary or, in a pragmatic approach, even used as a first step. Due to their gabapentinoid effect, gabapentin and pregabalin may also be effective; however, there are no published clinical observations or studies on this as yet. The Russian literature describes a step-by-step dose reduction, for example starting with 500 mg phenibut once or twice in 24 h (1). Mild withdrawal symptoms should benefit from physical therapy and nursing care alone.
Detectability
As yet, there is no point-of-care or laboratory test for the detection of phenibut. For its qualitative detection and quantitative determination, for example in plasma, high-pressure liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry is required (9, 11).
Protective effects
In animal models of ischemia and brain trauma, phenibut was associated with neuro- and cardioprotective effects, which were explained by increased brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) activity and antioxidant properties (2, e18–e20).
Experience from the Giftinformationszentrum-Nord
Between 2018 and 2022, the GIZ-Nord received 17 reports (nine from women) relating to phenibut. Affected individuals were 20- to 49-year-olds who reported orally consumed quantities of between 750 mg and 100 g. Parenteral use was not reported. In all cases, intoxication was deemed to be mild (n = 5) to moderate (n = 12) (Figure). Even at the 100-g dose, neither respiratory depression nor signs of severe intoxication were observed. In the overdoses (> 2 g, n = 15), somnolence was reported in eight cases and observation on the intensive care unit was recommended. During the period in question, around three times more inquiries were received regarding intoxications with gabapentin, approximately seven times more for pregabalin, roughly 70 times more for Z substances, and 254 times more for benzodiazepines (Figure).
Figure.
Cases registered at the GIZ-Nord center in the period 2018–2022
Of the 212,014 consultations regarding all toxins (76,110 cases relating to medications), the cases shown were found for the GABA mimetics selank (n = 0), phenibut (n = 17), gabapentin (n = 55), pregabalin (n = 126), Z substances (n = 1207), and benzodiazepines (n = 4324). Grading of severity was carried out according to Persson et al. 2018 (e21).
Initially, no patients were mechanically ventilated, resuscitated, or died. No severe intoxications were observed. In the moderate cases, CNS symptoms were reported eight times and gastrointestinal symptoms twice for phenibut. Alcohol and cannabis were each mentioned once as concomitant toxins. For gabapentin, CNS symptoms were mentioned five times and alcohol once as the concomitant toxin, for pregabalin, cardiovascular symptoms once and CNS symptoms eight times (opiates twice as concomitant toxins). No further differentiation was made for Z substances and benzodiazepines in terms of symptoms and concomitant substances for the purposes of this study, particularly since the information in this regard is uncertain also for the other substances mentioned.
Discussion
Like gabapentin and pregabalin, phenibut inhibits α2-δ subunits of presynaptic voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC) (e3, e4). These gabapentinoids have GABA-mimetic properties (i.e., they increase ambient GABA or the expression of extrasynaptic GABA-A receptors [e5, e11]), which have not been investigated for phenibut as yet. However, a number of clinical characteristics, such as benzodiazepine-like toxidrome and withdrawal syndrome, as well as the rapid development of tolerance for euphoria (1, 9), suggest GABA-A receptor stimulation. Moreover, phenibut was described as an element in multidrug use (7, 14). This is a pattern of use that also tends to be typical with gabapentin and pregabalin (6, e5, e22). In the few deaths described to date in the USA in conjunction with phenibut, concomitant use of various substances, including alcohol and opiates, was documented as the cause (7, 9, 10). Neuroprotective effects have also been described in animal models with phenibut (2, e18, e20) as well as with pregabalin, gabapentin, and the benzodiazepine midazolam (e23–e25). However, long-term parenteral administration of high doses of midazolam or pregabalin was also associated with neurotoxic effects (e26–e27).
Problematic alliance of opiates, sedatives, and gabapentinoids
Opiates and opioids have some serious side effects such as the development of dependence, and, with the increase in dose and depending on age, an increased risk of sedative states, falls, accidents, delirium, hallucinations, and respiratory depression (17). Regular use results in the development of tolerance to respiratory depression as well as to the analgesic and euphoric effects (17). It is likely that there are other mechanisms and motives to explain why repeated use of opioids in therapeutic and illegal contexts brings about an increase in dose (17).
The development of hyperalgesia is a characteristic phenomenon in prolonged opiate use, as is the development of an often very unpleasant and painful withdrawal syndrome if the dose is rapidly reduced or discontinued (17). It is assumed that these two phenomena are based on, among others things, the development of pharmacodynamic, oppositional tolerance (Box 4) primarily in the µ- and δ-opioid receptor signaling systems (e29) and could motivate opiate addicts to use additional opiates (3). Opiate addicts tend to seek substances that are also able to attenuate this process and alleviate the suffering caused by hyperalgesia or withdrawal syndrome (1, 3). It is common for opiate addicts to self-medicate with benzodiazepines (4) and other sedatives such as the α2-adrenoreceptor agonist xylazine, which is used for horses in veterinary medicine (street name: “Tranq,” “zombie drug”), and the use of which has been warned against by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (18, 19), among others. The synergistic effects of opiates and these sedatives increase the risk for coma, respiratory depression, and death.
Box 4. Oppositional tolerance.
Neuronal systems (including neurotransmitter receptors) respond in a plastic manner to an increasing change in stress: Oppositional tolerance often develops. As part of this typical dynamic homeostatic/allostatic adaptation process, cellular and synaptic counter-regulatory mechanisms are activated. Thus, as stimulation of the receptors increases, their sensitivity (densensitization) and density decrease (down-regulation of receptor expression). This counter-regulation depends on the frequency of stimulation, the neurotransmitter system, and the context (for example, tissue/age/extracellular environment). A rapid fall in stimulation or chronic continuous stimulation results in excessive responses. The latter result from the fact that opponents act overactively or even hypersensitively, or have been upregulated, in relation to the stimulated/continuously stimulated neurotransmitter system that has been desensitized and down-regulated, until such time as homeostasis/allostasis is re-established under these conditions. An example of opponents would be the excitatory elements as opponents of the affected inhibitory mechanisms in neuronal processes. In the brain, adaptations (plasticity) of this kind are also modulated by certain cytokines in the microglia. Oppositional tolerance is considered to be a basal mechanism that co-determines the intensity of withdrawal symptoms at the behavioral level (e28–e30).
Furthermore, pregabalin and gabapentin are particularly attractive to opiate addicts since, in addition to their sedative effects at supratherapeutic doses, they can also reduce the development of tolerance to opiates/opioids in the therapeutic dose range (and in animal experiments possibly even reverse this tolerance) (6–8). Thus, on the one hand, these substances may help to pare down the opiate requirements for the desired effects, but on the other they could also increase the likelihood of respiratory depression (7, 8). Therefore, sedatives and gabapentinoids have the potential to increase the risk for fatal respiratory depression if additional opiates are misused. To the extent possible, this aspect should be taken into consideration when providing patient information on opiate, gabapentinoid, and sedative prescriptions as well as in the psychoeducation of opiate addicts and polyvalent addicts.
Particularly in countries dealing with opioid crises, such as the USA and Canada (9, 10), sedatives as well as the gabapentinoids pregabalin and gabapentin are increasingly being found to be associated with respiratory depression and deaths due to opioid overdose (11–13) (Box 4). Despite the rise in fentanyl prescriptions, an opioid crisis in Germany is relatively unlikely due to the vigilant safety systems in place (10), but cannot be ruled out.
A comparison of phenibut and selank
Selank is also a Russian drug and GABA mimetic available as a food supplement. It is an immunomodulatory heptapeptide (a synthetic analog of tuftsin) that was developed by the Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences (e31). Since the early 1990s, selank has likewise been prescribed as a nootropic and anxiolytic in former Soviet Union countries. Like phenibut, it is currently available online as a food supplement. A GABA-mimetic effect has also been described in animal models through a dose-dependent benzodiazepine-like allosteric modulation of GABA-A receptors (e10, e32) and indirectly through a change in the expression of genes that are involved in, among other things, GABA neurotransmission (e32). An effect on the α2-δ subunits of VGCC has not been investigated as yet. Animal studies suggest that it attenuates withdrawal symptoms, including those of alcohol and opiate withdrawal (e31). There are no known cases of withdrawal symptoms or death associated with selank (e31). The GIZ-Nord has received no inquiries to date relating to selank (Figure).
Conclusion and outlook
Both the literature search and the analysis of the GIZ-Nord data suggest that the use of phenibut is not widespread on Germany’s hard drug scene (particularly among of heroin, synthetic opioid, cocaine, and methamphetamine addicts [e16]). Although the information to date suggests that phenibut appears to have a lower risk profile than gabapentin, pregabalin, and benzodiazepines (e15, e16), phenibut should not be overlooked in post-mortem material from drug-related deaths and in cases of implausible intoxication symptoms in routine clinical practice (especially from opiate substitution therapy) or as a doping agent (13). It is possible that phenibut-associated deaths have remained hitherto undetected, given that phenibut is not yet sufficiently known in the context of potentially fatal multidrug use in Western drug abuse behavior and simple detection methods are lacking.
Questions on the article in issue 7/2024:
Phenibutan—an Illegal Food Supplement With Psychotropic Effects and Health Risks
The submission deadline is 4 April 2025. Only one answer is possible per question. Please select the answer that is most appropriate.
Question 1
What is phenibut from a chemical perspective?
A derivative of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine.
A breakdown product of the neurotransmitter dopamine.
An analog of the neurotransmitter noradrenaline.
A derivative of the neurotransmitter serotonin.
An analog of the neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid.
Question 2
Which of the following molecular mechanisms of action is attributed to phenibut?
It activates presynaptic voltage-gated calcium channels.
It activates the α-subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels.
It inhibits the breakdown of acetylcholine in the synaptic cleft.
It inhibits voltage-gated calcium channels.
It is an antagonist of the GABA-A receptor.
Question 3
What is the elimination half-life given for phenibut in the manuscript?
1–2 h
5–6 h
8–12 h
12–24 h
24–48 h
Question 4
According to the information in the article, which statement regarding deaths due to phenibut applies?
Deaths due to phenibut use appear to occur frequently as soon as a daily dose of 2 g has been exceeded.
No deaths due to overdose with phenibut when taken alone (without multidrug use) have been reported in the literature as yet.
Deaths due to the use of phenibut when taken alone (without multidrug use) only occur from daily doses of 5 g.
Approximately 150 deaths due to phenibut use (without multidrug use) have been reported in Germany to date.
Even the one-time use of as little as 1 g of phenibut (orally) is guaranteed to result in death.
Question 5
Which other preparation, available online as a food supplement and having a similar effect to phenibut, is mentioned in the article?
Selank
Mulank
Senibut
Phenolank
Selenobut
Question 6
What is meant by receptor desensitization?
A decline in receptor expression with diminishing stimulation
Hypersensitivity or increased activation of the receptors while stimulation remains unchanged
A decline in receptor sensitivity with increasing stimulation
Permanent activation of the receptors, even in the absence of activating substances
The enzymatic degradation of receptor proteins upon lack of stimulation
Question 7
Which summarizing term is mentioned in the article for the counter-regulatory mechanisms in the case of permanent stimulation (for example, in substance abuse) that are ultimately also associated with the development of withdrawal syndromes?
Inverse sensitization
Controversial activity
Counterintuitive activation
Oppositional tolerance
Reactive sensitivity
Question 8
Which of the following statements on phenibut is made in the article?
Phenibut is not subject to pharmacovigilance in Germany.
Phenibut is available online in Germany as a food supplement.
Phenibut is sold as a (pharmacy-only) drug in France, Italy, and the United Kingdom.
A specific antidote can be used for phenibut intoxication.
The Giftinformationszentrum-Nord has not received any reports regarding phenibut to date.
Question 9
According to the information in the article, which of the following statements regarding the pharmacokinetics of phenibut most applies?
Phenibut is virtually unmetabolized by the liver.
Phenibut serves as a ‘pre-drug’ and is metabolized in the liver to its active form.
Phenibut is excreted only via the intestine rather than renally.
Phenibut has a bioavailability of less than 20%.
Phenibut is not able to pass the blood–brain barrier.
Question 10
According to the information in the article, which statement regarding the detectability of phenibut most applies?
It is not yet possible to detect phenibut in plasma.
A point-of-care test for the detection of phenibut is not yet available.
Phenibut can be detected by a breath test.
Phenibut can be detected in blood with an antigen test.
Urine pH test strips are suitable for the detection of phenibut, since phenibut makes urine acidic.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. rer. nat. Rafael Wagner (Dipl.-Chem.), GIZ-Nord, for evaluating cases in the GIZ-Nord database.
Translated from the original German by Christine Rye.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement
UB is an associate member of the Drug Commission of the German Medical Association (Arzneimittelkommission der deutschen Ärzteschaft, AkdÄ).
NS is a member of the Expert Committee on Narcotic Drugs (Sachverständigenausschuss für Betäubungsmittel) at the German Federal Ministry of Health (Bundesministerium für Gesundheit), member of the “Addiction and Drugs” (“Sucht und Drogen”) Committee of the German Medical Association (Bundesärztekammer), and Chairman of the German Center for Addiction Issues (Deutsche Hauptstelle für Suchtfragen e.V., DHS).
The remaining authors declare that no conflict of interest exists.
References
- 1.Lapin I. Phenibut (beta-phenyl-GABA): a tranquilizer and nootropic drug. CNS Drug Rev. 2001;7:471–481. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3458.2001.tb00211.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kupats E, Vrublevska J, Zvejniece B, et al. Safety and tolerability of the anxiolytic and nootropic drug phenibut: a systematic review of clinical trials and case reports. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2020;53:201–208. doi: 10.1055/a-1151-5017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bonnet U, Scherbaum N. [On the risk of dependence on gabapentinoids] Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2018;86:82–105. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-122392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Calandre EP, Rico-Villademoros F, Slim M. Alpha2delta ligands, gabapentin, pregabalin and mirogabalin: a review of their clinical pharmacology and therapeutic use. Expert Rev Neurother. 2016;16:1263–1277. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2016.1202764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McCabe DJ, Bangh SA, Arens AM, Cole JB. Phenibut exposures and clinical effects reported to a regional poison center. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37:2066–2071. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.02.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Evoy KE, Peckham AM, Covvey JR, Tidgewell KJ. Gabapentinoid pharmacology in the context of emerging misuse liability. J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;61(Suppl 2):S89–S99. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Graves JM, Dilley J, Kubsad S, Liebelt E. Notes from the field: phenibut exposures reported to poison centers—United States, 2009-2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:1227–1228. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6935a5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Behmer Hansen RA, Behmer Hansen RT, Noureddine C, Behmer VA, Opler D. Reasons for use and experiences of using phenibut, a mixed methods analysis of online reports. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2023;49:458–469. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2023.2204510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Arndt C, Gray TR. Phenibut, a GABA-B agonist, detected in a fatality. J Anal Toxicol. 2021 doi: 10.1093/jat/bkab099. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Papsun DM, Chan-Hosokawa A, Friederich L, Brower J, Graf K, Logan B. The trouble with kratom: analytical and interpretative issues involving mitragynine. J Anal Toxicol. 2019;43:615–629. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkz064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jouney EA. Phenibut (β-phenyl-γ-aminobutyric acid): an easily obtainable “dietary supplement” with propensities for physical dependence and addiction. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019;21 doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1009-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hardman MI, Sprung J, Weingarten TN. Acute phenibut withdrawal: a comprehensive literature review and illustrative case report. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2019;19:125–129. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2018.4008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jędrejko K, Catlin O, Stewart T, Anderson A, Muszyńska B, Catlin DH. Unauthorized ingredients in “nootropic“ dietary supplements: a review of the history, pharmacology, prevalence, international regulations, and potential as doping agents. Drug Test Anal. 2023;15:803–839. doi: 10.1002/dta.3529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Weleff J, Kovacevich A, Burson J, Nero N, Anand A. Clinical presentations and treatment of phenibut toxicity and withdrawal: a systematic literature review. J Addict Med. 2023;17:407–417. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bundesministerium für Gesundheit. Das Neue-psychoaktive-Stoffe-Gesetz (NpSG) www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/service/begriffe-von-a-z/n/npsg.html (last accessed on 11 November 2023) [Google Scholar]
- 16.Morris M, Espinosa J, Lucerna A, Lahr R. A case of phenibut withdrawal and treatment with baclofen. World J Emerg Med. 2023;14:338–340. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Scherbaum N, Bonnet U. [Neurobiology of Opiat dependence] Anaesthesist. 2019;68:179–190. doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-0557-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.aerzteblatt.de. US-Behörden wollen verschärft gegen illegalen Import von Xylazin vorgehen. Tagesaktuelle Nachrichten vom 10.03.2023. www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrichten/141384/US-Behoerden-wollen-verschaerft-gegen-illegalen-Import-von-Xylazin-vorgehen (last accessed on 3 December 2023) [Google Scholar]
- 19.FDA-Warning. FDA alerts health care professionals of risks to patients exposed to xylazine in illicit drugs. www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-alerts-health-care-professionals-risks-patients-exposed-xylazine-illicit-drugs (last accessed on 5 January 2024) 2022 Aug 01; [Google Scholar]
- E1.Komisarek D, Taskiran E, Vasylyeva V. Maleic acid as a co-former for pharmaceutically active GABA derivatives: mechanochemistry or solvent crystallization? Materials (Basel) 2023;16 doi: 10.3390/ma16062242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E2.Dambrova M, Zvejniece L, Liepinsh E, et al. Comparative pharmacological activity of optical isomers of phenibut. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;583:128–134. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E3.Zvejniece L, Vavers E, Svalbe B, et al. R-phenibut binds to the α2-δ subunit of voltage-dependent calcium channels and exerts gabapentin-like anti-nociceptive effects. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2015;137:23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2015.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E4.Belozertseva I, Nagel J, Valastro B, Franke L, Danysz W. Optical isomers of phenibut inhibit [H(3)]-gabapentin binding in vitro and show activity in animal models of chronic pain. Pharmacol Rep. 2016;68:550–554. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2015.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E5.Bonnet U. Gabapentinoide: entwichen aus der Büchse der Pandora? DNP. 2022;23:32–38. [Google Scholar]
- E6.Irsfeld M, Spadafore M, Prüβ BM. β-phenylethylamine, a small molecule with a large impact. Webmedcentral. 2013;4 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E7.Martin R, Buffenstein I, Cho D, Kiyokawa M. Toxidrome of an easily obtainable nootropic: a case report of phenibut intoxication and withdrawal delirium. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023;43:507–510. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E8.Nedzlek CD, Michaelis A. An unusual presentation of an uncommon drug: a case report on phenibut overdose. Cureus. 2022;14 doi: 10.7759/cureus.23913. e23913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E9.Doyno CR, White CM. Sedative-hypnotic agents that impact gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors: focus on flunitrazepam, gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, phenibut, and selank. J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;61(Suppl 2):S114–S128. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E10.Dolphin AC. Voltage-gated calcium channels and their auxiliary subunits: physiology and pathophysiology and pharmacology. J Physiol. 2016;594:5369–5390. doi: 10.1113/JP272262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E11.Reddy DS. An enigmatic role of tonic inhibition in gabapentin therapy. EBioMedicine. 2019;42:14–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.03.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E12.Brunner E, Levy R. Case report of physiologic phenibut dependence treated with a phenobarbital taper in a patient being treated with buprenorphine. J Addict Med. 2017;11:239–240. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E13.Kraus L, Schiemann A, Verthein U. www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwimtO_3loKAAxWsRPEDHZQFDE4QFnoECBAQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fift.de%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2022%2F08%2FKraus_et_al_2020_NpSG-Abschlussbericht.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3pcpnLE2W0X3B2Da_K2oAb&opi=89978449 (last accessed on 11 November 2023) Institut für Therapieforschung; 2019. Evaluation der Auswirkungen des Neue-psychoaktive-Stoffe-Gesetzes (NpSG): Abschlussbericht. [Google Scholar]
- E14.Penninga EI, Graudal N, Ladekarl MB, Jürgens G. Adverse events associated with flumazenil treatment for the management of suspected benzodiazepine intoxication—a systematic review with meta-analyses of randomised trials. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2016;118:37–44. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E15.Bonnet U, McAnally HB. How prevalent and severe is addiction on GABAmimetic drugs in an elderly German general hospital population? Focus on gabapentinoids, benzodiazepines, and z-hypnotic drugs. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2022;37 doi: 10.1002/hup.2822. e2822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E16.Bonnet U, Specka M, Soyka M, et al. Ranking the harm of psychoactive drugs including prescription analgesics to users and others—a perspective of German addiction medicine experts. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11 doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.592199. 592199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E17.Soyka M. Treatment of benzodiazepine dependence. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1147–1157. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1611832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E18.Mokrousov IS, Perfilova VN, Prokofiev II, et al. Effect of a new cyclic derivative of GABA, RGPU-207, on the functions of cardiac and cerebral mitochondria of stressed animals. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2019;71:1055–1064. doi: 10.1111/jphp.13086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E19.Vavers E, Zvejniece L, Svalbe B, et al. The neuroprotective effects of R-phenibut after focal cerebral ischemia. Pharmacol Res. 2016;113 (Pt B):796–801. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2015.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E20.Volotova EV, Filina IS, Bakulin DA, Kurkin DV, Tyurenkov IN. Neuroprotective action of phenibut and neuroglutam in experimental cerebral ischemia on the background of altered immunoreactivity. Eksp Klin Farmakol. 2016;79:18–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E21.Persson HE, Sjöberg GK, Haines JA, Pronczuk de Garbino J. Poisoning severity score. Grading of acute poisoning. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1998;36:205–213. doi: 10.3109/15563659809028940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E22.Bonnet U, Kanti AK, Scherbaum N, Specka M. The role of gabapentinoids in the substance use pattern of adult Germans seeking inpatient detoxification treatment—a pilot study. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2023;55:102–111. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2022.2050858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E23.Liu JY, Guo F, Wu HL, Wang Y, Liu JS. Midazolam anesthesia protects neuronal cells from oxidative stress-induced death via activation of the JNK-ERK pathway. Mol Med Rep. 2017;15:169–179. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2016.6031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E24.Kumar A, Goyal R. Gabapentin attenuates acute hypoxic stress-induced behavioral alterations and oxidative damage in mice: possible involvement of GABAergic mechanism. Indian J Exp Biol. 2008;46:159–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E25.Yan BC, Wang J, Rui Y, et al. Neuroprotective effects of gabapentin against cerebral ischemia reperfusion-induced neuronal autophagic injury via regulation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2019;78:157–171. doi: 10.1093/jnen/nly119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E26.Taha SHN, Zaghloul HS, Ali AAER, Gaballah IF, Rashed LA, Aboulhoda BE. The neurotoxic effect of long-term use of high-dose pregabalin and the role of alpha tocopherol in amelioration: implication of MAPK signaling with oxidative stress and apoptosis. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2020;393:1635–1648. doi: 10.1007/s00210-020-01875-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E27.Soyalp C, Oksuz E, Gorgisen G, et al. Role of sedative-hypnotic agents in neurodegeneration: effects of midazolam and thiopental on apoptosis and oxidative stress expression in neonatal and adult rat brains. Turk Neurosurg. 2022;32:378–385. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.32324-20.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E28.Andrews PW, Kornstein SG, Halberstadt LJ, Gardner CO, Neale MC. Blue again: perturbational effects of antidepressants suggest monoaminergic homeostasis in major depression. Front Psychol. 2011;2 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E29.Cahill CM, Walwyn W, Taylor AMW, Pradhan AAA, Evans CJ. Allostatic mechanisms of opioid tolerance beyond desensitization and downregulation. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2016;37:963–976. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2016.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E30.Koob GF. Drug addiction: hyperkatifeia/negative reinforcement as a framework for medications development. Pharmacol Rev. 2021;73:163–201. doi: 10.1124/pharmrev.120.000083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E31.Konstantinopolsky MA, Chernyakova IV, Kolik LG. Selank, a peptide analog of tuftsin, attenuates aversive signs of morphine withdrawal in rats. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2022;173:730–733. doi: 10.1007/s10517-022-05624-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E32.Vyunova TV, Andreeva L, Shevchenko K, Myasoedov N. Peptide-based anxiolytics: the molecular aspects of heptapeptide selank biological activity. Protein Pept Lett. 2018;25:914–923. doi: 10.2174/0929866525666180925144642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




