Table 2.
Study | ANCA status | Age, years | Sex (% female) |
---|---|---|---|
Hedger et al. [6] (2000) | Positive | 61 | 39 |
Negative | 61 | 51 | |
Eisenberger et al. [14] (2005) | Negative | 65 | 25 |
Hung et al. [7] (2006) | Positive | 59 a | 44 |
Negative | 45 a | 46 | |
Chen et al. [8] (2007) | Positive | 57 a | 47 |
Negative | 39 a | 42 | |
Villacorta et al. [9] (2016) | Positive | 62 a | 44 |
Negative | 55 a | 31 | |
Shah et al. [10] (2016) | Positive | 60 | 47 |
Negative | 60 | 47 | |
Lee et al. [15] (2016) | Positive | 71 | 52 a |
Negative | 69 | 0 a | |
Córdova-Sánchez et al. [16] (2016) | Positive | PR3 50, MPO 47 | PR3 49, MPO 81a |
Negative | 49 | 67 | |
Sharma et al. [11] (2016) | Positive | 47 | 57 |
Negative | 35 | 46 | |
Ronsin et al. [4] (2022) | Negative | 70 | 40 |
Floyd et al. [12] (2023) | Positive | 66 a | 48 |
Negative | 51 a | 33 | |
Elahi et al. [13] (2024) | Positive | 35 | 46 |
Negative | 34 | 56 |
To simplify the data in the tables, only the average or median value is shown, without including standard deviations.
aReported as a statistically significant difference (also in bold).