Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 1;59(Suppl 2):e14360. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14360

TABLE 2.

Types of adaptations employed.

Implementation support
Sites implementing adaptations overall (N = 20) High‐touch implementation support (N = 12) Low‐touch implementation support (N = 8)
Amount and diversity of adaptations N sites (%) a N sites (%) N sites (%)
Two or greater adaptations 11 (55) 7 (58.3) 4 (50)
Two or more classifications 7 (35) 4 (33.3) 3 (37.5)
Adaptation classifications N sites (%) a N adaptations b N sites (%) N adaptations N sites (%) N adaptations
Personnel 8 (40.0) 15 4 (33.3) 9 4 (50.0) 5
Program Recruitment 6 (30.0) 6 4 (33.3) 4 2 (25.0) 2
Program Delivery 6 (30.0) 6 4 (33.3) 4 1 (12.5) 1
Cross‐Service Line Collaboration 3 (15.0) 3 1 (8.3) 1 2 (25.0) 2
Format 7 (35.0) 10 5 (41.7) 8 2 (25.0) 2
Delivery 3 (15.0) 4 2 (16.7) 3 1 (12.5) 1
Pace 6 (30.0) 6 5 (41.7) 5 1 (12.5) 1
Training 3 (15.0) 3 2 (16.7) 2 1 (12.5) 1
Content 4 (20.0) 5 3 (25.0) 3 1 (12.5) 2
Optional material 2 (10.0) 2 1 (8.3) 1 1 (12.5) 1
Add class 1 (5.0) 1 0 0 1 (12.5) 1
Remove material 2 (10.0) 2 2 (16.7) 2 0 (0) 0
Population 2 (10.0) 2 2 (16.7) 2 0 (0) 0
a

Sites may make multiple adaptations within a classification, resulting in the number of sites in subclassifications not adding up to the number of sites making adaptations in a classification. All percentages are calculated using the column site sample size as the denominator (e.g., N = 20 sites overall, or N = 12 high‐touch implementation sites, or N = 8 low‐touch implementation sites).

b

Adaptations made in subclassifications of an adaptation classification (either Personnel, Format, Training Content or Population) all do add or sum up to the classification total.