Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 7;14(11):e70136. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70136

TABLE 4.

Association of years of frequent cannabis use (at least twice a week) with IQ changes in a subsample of cannabis users (n = 1114).

Unadjusted Model 1 a Model 2 b Model 3 c Model 4 d
b [95% CI] e R 2 p value b [95% CI] e R 2 p value b [95% CI] e R 2 p value b [95% CI] e R 2 p value b [95% CI] e R 2 p value
Years of frequent cannabis use 0.000 0.202 0.213 0.208 0.217
No frequent use (n = 872) Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
≤ 10 years (n = 112) 0.30 [−1.55, 2.15] 0.749 0.63 [−1.04, 2.30] 0.458 0.46 [−1.24, 2.16] 0.598 0.86 [−0.81, 2.53] 0.310 0.59 [−1.11, 2.29] 0.497
> 10 years (n = 130) 1.20 [−0.54, 2.93] 0.175 0.49 [−1.07, 2.06] 0.537 0.43 [−1.28, 2.14] 0.620 0.86 [−0.72, 2.44] 0.287 0.59 [−1.12, 2.30] 0.501
a

Model 1: Age at follow‐up, retest interval, IQ at conscription, years of education.

b

Model 2: Age at follow‐up, retest interval, IQ at conscription, years of education, years of weekly extreme binge drinking, use of other illicit drugs, smoking.

c

Model 3: Age at follow‐up, retest interval, IQ at conscription, years of education, psychiatric disorders, CCI.

d

Model 4: Fully adjusted model.

e

Positive numbers indicate less change in IQ scores from baseline to follow‐up compared to the change observed in the reference group, while negative numbers indicate a larger change in IQ scores compared to the reference group.