Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Dec 4.
Published in final edited form as: Proc ACM Int Conf Multimodal Interact. 2024 Nov 4;2024:350–354. doi: 10.1145/3678957.3685711

Table 3:

Classification accuracy (%) on the combined dataset (i.e., adolescents and young adults) with kineme histograms. The effect of four factors is shown: Histogram type (count vs. magnitude), treatment of scales (separated or collapsed), letters used (singletons vs. all letters) and usage of speech detection (speech- and listening-time kinemes in different histograms combined, speech-time kinemes only, listening-time kinemes only, and no usage of speech separation). Bold, italic and underlined texts respectively denote the first, second, and third best result. Spe: Speaking, Lis: Listening, Non-sep: Non-separated speech.

Count Histograms Magnitude Histograms
Spe & Lis Spe Lis Non-sep. Spe & Lis Spe Lis Non-sep.
Separated scales Singletons 75.5 71.6 66.7 75.5 80.4 71.6 53.9 63.7
All letters 72.5 67.6 61.8 68.6 70.6 64.7 59.8 66.7
Collapsed scales Singletons 61.8 68.6 60.8 57.8 64.7 56.9 48.0 52.9
All letters 59.8 64.7 53.9 62.7 57.8 57.8 48.0 52.9