Abstract
Introduction
Miang is one of the post-fermented teas made in Northern Thailand. Although lactic acid bacteria are involved in fermentation of Miang, details are still not clear. This study investigated the diversity of Lactobacillaceae bacteria, related to fermentation of Miang. Probiotic potential of isolated Lactobacillaceae bacteria was examined.
Methods
Lactobacillaceae bacteria were isolated from 52 Miang samples collected from three provinces in northern Thailand and identified by MALDI-TOF MS. Hemolytic activity, antibiotic susceptibility, antimicrobial activity and tolerance to gastrointestinal juice were examined for probiotic potential of isolates.
Results
A total of 1,181 Lactobacillaceae bacteria strains were isolated from Miang. The most abundant isolates were Lactiplantibacillus pentosus. Besides Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Levilactobacillus brevis, Paucilactobacillus suebicus, Lacticaseibacillus pantheris, and Secundilactobacillus collinoides were also found with frequency. Of these isolates, 450 with a high score for MALDI-TOF identification were then screened for probiotic ability. Most isolates were resistant to aminoglycosides and clindamycin. Then, 35 isolates were tested for their antimicrobial activity against pathogens using the well diffusion method, and 31 isolates exhibited inhibition zones against Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, S. enterica serovar Enteritidis, Listeria monocytogenes, Propionibacterium acnes, and Streptococcus mutans. All 31 isolates were non-hemolytic and readily tolerated simulated gastric juice at pH 3 and simulated intestinal juice at pH 8.
Discussion
Miang contains lactic acid bacteria that could potentially be used as probiotics.
Keywords: Miang, lactic acid bacteria, Lactiplantibacillus, probiotics, diversity
1. Introduction
Miang is a post-fermented tea produced in northern Thailand, especially in the provinces of Chiang Mai, Phrae, Chiangrai, Lampang, and Nan (Khanongnuch et al., 2017). The basic method of making Miang is as follows: (1) young soft tea leaves of Camellia sinensis var. assamica are picked; (2) the leaves are bundled and steamed; and (3) the steamed leaves are stuffed tightly into plastic bags and closed to create anaerobic conditions for lactate fermentation. The details of the Miang fermentation process differ between different regions of Thailand (Horie et al., 2020). There are two types of Miang depending on the fermentation period. One is “Miang-Faat (astringent Miang),” which has a shorter fermentation period (7–28 days) and a bitter taste, and the other is “Miang-Som (sour Miang),” which has a longer fermentation period (3–12 months) and a sour taste. Lactate fermentation is the main step in the production process of all types of Miang, and thus lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are essential for Miang production. Miang has beneficial physiological effects, and has been reported to exert antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties (Abdullahi et al., 2021).
Post-fermented teas are produced in three areas of the world, namely border areas between Southeast Asian countries (Thailand, Laos and Myanmar), China [Yunnan (Puer tea), Hunan (Anhua dark tea), Hubei (Qingzhuan tea), Guangxi (Liubao tea), etc.] and Japan. One of the most well-known and widely produced post-fermented teas is Puer tea, primarily produced in Yunnan, China. Puer tea falls under the category of “dark tea” in China, a category which also includes teas produced in Sichuan and Hubei, China. Yunnan is the primary production area for puer tea (Guo et al., 2004). Puer tea has been reported to improve BMI and lipid profile and to exhibit prebiotic effects (Jensen et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2020). However, lactic acid fermentation does not include in the production process of puer tea. Lactic acid bacteria are not the primary fermenting bacteria in Chinese dark tea. Instead, puer tea undergoes aerobic fermentation, with filamentous fungi of the genus Aspergillus and yeasts being the major microorganisms involved in the fermentation process (Abe et al., 2008). Additionally, it has been reported that Aspergillus niger and Blastobotrys adeninivorans are involved in fermentation process of puer tea (Lyu et al., 2013). Similarly, Batabata-cha, one of the Japanese post-fermented tea is produced through aerobic fermentation involving Aspergillus fumigatus, and does not include lactic acid fermentation (Horie et al., 2019b). Tea extracts, including those from puer tea, have been shown to inhibit aflatoxin production by downregulating the transcription of aflatoxin synthesis-related genes aflR and aflS in Aspergillus flavus (Mo et al., 2013). Oxidized tea polyphenols also form complexes with aflatoxin B1, thereby inhibiting its absorption in the digestive tract (Lu et al., 2017). In contrast, Miang tea produced in Thailand, as well as Ishizuchi-kurocha and Awa-bancha tea produced in Japan, involve lactic acid fermentation in their production processes (Horie et al., 2020). The beneficial activities discussed above for Miang, have also been reported for Japanese post-fermented teas. Among Japanese post-fermented teas, the fermentation method for Awa-bancha, which is produced in Tokushima on Japan’s Shikoku island, is similar to that of Miang. Awa-bancha is produced only by lactate fermentation, mainly by Camellia sinensis var. sinensis (Nishioka et al., 2021). Japanese post-fermented teas, including Awa-bancha, have antioxidative activity (Horie et al., 2016). Furthermore, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum isolated from Awa-bancha exhibited an allergy-suppressing effect in a mouse model of atopic dermatitis (Yoshida et al., 2010). Another Japanese post-fermented tea, Ishizuchi-kurocha, which is produced by step-fermentation, had an inhibitory effect of degranulation of RBL-2H3 cells and lipid accumulation in adipocyte-like 3T3-L1 cells (Horie et al., 2019b). Additionally, Ishizuchi-kurocha contains gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) and d-amino acids such as d-alanine, glutamate, and d-aspartate (Horie et al., 2023). These molecules are produced by LAB during fermentation. In many cases, the beneficial properties of post-fermented teas are derived from microorganisms related to fermentation. The role of LAB is particularly important. Levilactobacillus brevis strains isolated from Ishizuchi-kurocha and Awa-bancha have high GABA-producing ability (Horie et al., 2019b; Nishioka et al., 2022). In addition, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Levilactobacillus brevis produce D-amino acids. Furthermore, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum isolated from Ishizuchi-kurocha exhibits antibiotic resistance (Horie et al., 2019a), and Limosilactobacillus fermentum isolated from Miang exhibited antibacterial activity against pathogens such as Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi, Shigella sonnei, and Staphylococcus aureus, in addition to an ability to scavenge free radicals (Klayraung and Okonogi, 2009). Thus, in post-fermented tea, the LAB involved in fermentation are affected by the environment during fermentation, producing many physiologically active substances that impart functionality to the post-fermented tea.
Therefore, LAB derived from post-fermented teas may have beneficial properties for probiotic use, and these LAB strains are expected to be useful in the food industry. However, the metabolism of physiologically active substances produced by LAB is species dependent. For example, Levilactobacillus brevis derived from Ishizuchi-kurocha exhibits high GABA-producing ability, whereas Lactiplantibacillus plantarum has low GABA-producing ability (Horie et al., 2019b). Additionally, even within the same species, different strains have different characteristics.
There have been several reports on the LAB species involved in the fermentation of Miang. The Lactobacillus species, Lacticaseibacillus pantheris, Lactiplantibacillus pentosus, Paucilactobacillus suebicus, and Limosilactobacillus fermentum, were reported from Miang obtained from markets in Bangkok and Chiang Mai (the production area was unknown), along with the novel species Lacticaseibacillus thailandensis and Lacticaseibacillus camelliae; however, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, which is the dominant species in Japanese fermented teas, was not reported in these cases (Tanasupawat et al., 2007). According to another study, Lactiplantibacillus pentosus and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum were isolated from Miang produced in Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai, Nan, and Phrae, and the proportion of Lactiplantibacillus pentosus was reported to be high (Unban et al., 2021). These strains exhibited antibacterial activity, antibiotic resistance, and tolerance to gastric and intestinal juices. Additionally, Lactiplantibacillus pentosus derived from Miang has been reported to alleviate dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis (Kangwan et al., 2022). In another study, the dominant bacterial species in Miang, produced in eight provinces in upper-northern Thailand, were reported to be Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lactiplantibacillus pentosus. Of these two species, Lactiplantibacillus pentosus possessed a tannase gene and exhibited tannin tolerance, whereas L. plantarum did not possess a tannase gene and exhibited lower tannin tolerance (Chaikaew et al., 2017). Taken together, these results suggest that Lactiplantibacillus pentosus is an important species in Miang.
Miang is produced across a wide area of northern Thailand, and there is thought to be regional diversity. Among Japanese post-fermented teas, Ishizuchi-kurocha made in Ehime prefecture and Awa-bancha made in Tokushima prefecture differ in terms of the dominant LAB species (Nishioka et al., 2021; Horie et al., 2019a). The dominant species reported in Ishizuchi-kurocha is Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, and the dominant species in Awa-bancha is generally Lactiplantibacillus pentosus. Interestingly, the dominant species also differed between Awa-bancha that was produced in southern Tokushima (mainly L. pentosus) and eastern Tokushima (mainly L. plantarum) (Nishioka et al., 2021). It is not clear why the dominant species differ in the same post-fermented teas. The geographical area in which Miang is made is greater than Tokushima prefecture of Japan, and the geographical conditions, such as the climate, are different. The species of LAB involved in the fermentation of Miang differ depending on the production region, and it is thought that Miang-derived LAB may have potential as probiotics. If so, it may be possible to add some of the beneficial functions of Miang to other foods and supplements, with resulting health benefits.
In the present study, the LAB species involved in the fermentation of Miang produced in multiple regions of northern Thailand were investigated. The isolated Lactobacillus strains were then evaluated for their probiotic properties.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Collection of samples
In total, 20 astringent-Miang and 32 sour-Miang samples from each step of the Miang production process including fresh leaves, steamed leaves, and fermented leaves at different fermentation times were collected from each sampling site. Except fresh leaves, each sample was thoroughly mixed before sampling. In case of fresh leaves, the leaves collected from miang trees grown in the same area were collected and pooled as one sample. Additionally, commercially supplied Miang samples available in wet markets were also collected. Fresh leaves were packed in zip lock plastic bags and kept in a foam box containing ice. In other cases, samples were aseptically added into a vial containing Viande–Levure (VL) broth (one sample/vial) and labeled as MSL with the sample number. For liquid samples, 5 mL of fermented liquid was mixed with 5 mL of double strength VL broth and labeled as MS with the sample number. All vials were tightly closed. After inoculation, the remaining samples were individually packed in plastic bags and kept in tightly closed containers as reference samples.
2.2. Microorganisms and growth conditions
The pathogenic indicator strains used in this study were Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Staphylococcus epidermidis TISTR 518, Escherichia coli ATCC 8379, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium TISTR 292, Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis DMST 15676, Listeria monocytogenes DMST 13820, Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175, Propionibacterium acnes DMST 14916, and Candida albicans ATCC 10231. All of the indicator microorganisms were stored at −80°C in 40% glycerol until use. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Staphylococcus epidermidis TISTR 518, E. coli ATCC 8379, Salmonella Typhimurium TISTR 292, Salmonella Enteritidis DMST 15676, and Listeria monocytogenes DMST 13820 were grown in Mueller–Hinton (MH) agar or broth at 37°C for 18–24 h. Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175 and Propionibacterium acnes DMST 14916 were anaerobically cultured on brain–heart infusion (BHI) agar or broth or 5% sheep blood agar at 37°C for 24–54 h. Candida albicans ATCC 10231 was grown in YMA (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).
2.3. 16S rRNA gene and ITS2 amplicon sequence analysis
Genomic DNA for microbiome analysis from Miang was prepared using the DNeasy® PowerLyzer® PowerSoil® kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol with a bead cell disrupter (FastPrep-24™ Classic, MP Biomedicals, Irvine, CA, United States). Microbiome analysis was performed by Genome-Lead Corp. (Takamatsu, Japan). To analyze bacterial and fungal flora by amplicon sequence analysis, the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene and the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region was amplified by KAPA HiFi HotStart (F. Hoffmann–La Roche, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland) using amplification primers 341F-806R and gITS7-ITS4 (Ihrmark et al., 2012), respectively. A library was created based on the 16S Metagenomics Sequencing Library Preparation kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, United States), and the sequences were determined using Miseq (Illumina). The analysis was performed using QIIME 1.9.1.
2.4. Isolation and identification of LAB from samples
Although accuracy of bacterial identification at species- or strain levels requires additional genotypic methods, e.g., Species-specific primers PCR or Genome-based identification for calculation of % Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI), MALDI TOF was used for identification in this study without additional methods due to the following reasons: Huge number of purified isolates which were obtained from the samples. Only isolates with high confidence score values (>2.3) were selected for further study. Based on the Biotyper database, this level of score values are considered “highly reliable species identification. And MALDI TOF has been used for identification of Lactic acid bacteria in several publications (Angelakis et al., 2011; Dušková et al., 2012; Nacef et al., 2017; Kanak and Yolmaz, 2019; Kačániová et al., 2020; Bouchibane et al., 2022). All vials containing samples were incubated anaerobically in an anaerobic jar (Thermo Fisher Scientific™, United States) containing an AnaeroPack® (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) at 37°C for 24 h. After incubation, each sample was 10-fold serially diluted with normal saline. Then, 100 μL of each dilution was spread onto de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) agar (Merck), pH 6.8, supplemented with 0.05% L-cysteine HCl (Merck), and incubated anaerobically, as previously mentioned. For the master plates, 30 colonies/sample were randomly selected and streaked onto MRS agar plates containing 0.05% (w/v) L-cysteine. After incubation at 37°C for 24 h, each colony was further purified by cross-streaking and maintained at −80°C in 40% glycerol. Identification of isolated bacteria was performed by Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Sample preparation for MALDI TOF MS was carried out according to the “ethanol formic acid extraction” protocol (Bruker Daltonics, Germany). Three spots were prepared for each isolate. The target plate was directly analyzed using the Autoflex speed mass spectrometer with MALDI-Biotyper Realtime Classification version 4 (Bruker Daltonics) and MBT MSP Library version 6. The parameter settings were optimized for a mass range between 2 and 20 kDa. Spectra were recorded in the positive linear mode. A total of 200–500 laser shots were accumulated from each spot. Calibration of the mass spectrometer was performed with the Bruker’s bacterial test standard (E. coli DH5α extracts with the additional proteins RNase A and myoglobin, Bruker Daltonics). The results of analysis were expressed as confidence score values as follows: 2.300–3.000, highly reliable species identification; 2.000–2.299, highly reliable genus identification; 1.700–1.999, probable genus identification; and 0.000–1.699, no reliable identification.
2.5. Hemolytic assay
Each isolated LAB was streaked onto blood base agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood. After 24 h anaerobic incubation at 37°C, zones around the colonies were visualized and recorded. Only isolates showing no clear zones around colonies (γ-hemolysis) were considered non-hemolytic (Cafiso et al., 2012). Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 was used as the positive control.
2.6. Antibiotic resistance phenotypes
Based on (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP), 2018), nine types of standard antibiotic disks (Oxoid Limited, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) were used for the assay, namely ampicillin (10 μg), vancomycin (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), kanamycin (10 μg), streptomycin (10 μg), and clindamycin (2 μg). Antibiotic susceptibility was determined using a disk diffusion assay according to the EUCAST disk diffusion test Vol 10.0, 2022. Briefly, the inoculum was prepared using the direct colony suspension method. Using a sterile cotton swab, 4–5 colonies of 18–24 h culture, grown anaerobically on MRS agar containing 0.05% L–cysteine HCl (w/v) at 37°C, were suspended in normal saline solution. After mixing, the suspension was further diluted with normal saline solution to obtain a turbidity match to that of the McFarland standard solution No. 0.5. To prepare test plates, the inoculum was thoroughly applied over the surface of MRS agar plates. Each standard antibiotic disk was then gently placed over the surface of the test plates (1 disk/plate). All plates were incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 24 h. After incubation, the inhibition zones for each antibiotic were measured and compared with the breakpoint values (Charteris et al., 1998a). The results were expressed as sensitive (S) or resistant (R). The test was performed in duplicate.
2.7. Antimicrobial activities of cell-free supernatants
As a cell-free supernatant, a 48 h culture of each isolate, grown in MRS broth, pH 6.8, supplemented with 0.05% L-cysteine HCl (w/v), was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was collected, sterilized through a 0.22 μm filter membrane (Merck), then stored at −20°C until use. A well diffusion assay was used to determine the antimicrobial activities against pathogenic indicator microorganisms (Kazemipoor et al., 2012). Briefly, colonies of the pathogenic indicator microorganisms grown on suitable media were suspended in BHI broth (Merck). To prepare the inoculum, the turbidity of the microbial suspension was adjusted with normal saline solution to match that of a 0.5 McFarland standard. The inoculum was evenly applied onto the surface of 20 mL of either MHA, 5% sheep blood agar, or YM agar. Then, 6 mm wells were made in the test agar using a sterile cork borer. Each well was loaded with 60 μL of the cell-free supernatant. Normal saline was used as the negative control. After a suitable incubation period, the diameters of the inhibition zones observed around the wells were measured in millimeters. According to Shokryazdan et al. (2014), the effectiveness of antimicrobial activity was classified as follows: inhibition zones of more than 20 mm, 10–20 mm, and less than 10 mm were considered as strong, intermediate, and weak inhibition, respectively. The test was performed twice.
2.8. In vitro tolerance to simulated gastrointestinal juices
The abilities of LAB isolates to tolerate simulated gastric juice and simulated intestinal juice were assayed as reported previously by Charteris et al. (1998b). Briefly, LAB were cultured in MRS broth containing 0.05% L-cysteine HCl (w/v) and anaerobically incubated at 37°C for 18–24 h. After incubation, the cell pellet was harvested by centrifugation at 5,000 rpm for 10 min and subsequently washed twice with Dulbecco’s PBS. To prepare the inoculum, the washed cell pellet was suspended in Dulbecco’s PBS to obtain a cell concentration of approximately 109 CFU/mL. Tolerance to simulated gastric juice: a volume of 100 μL of the inoculum was added into 5 mL of simulated gastric juice, pH 2 (6.2 g/L NaCl, 2.2 g/L KCl, 0.22 g/L CaCl2, 1.2 g/L NaHCO3, and 0.3% pepsin, w/v), which was then adjusted to pH 2 or pH 3. After mixing, the inoculated solution was incubated at 37°C for 90 min. Tolerance to simulated intestinal juice: A volume of 100 μL of the inoculum was added into 5 mL of simulated intestinal juice, pH 8 (0.03% Oxgall, 6.4 g/L NaHCO3, 0.239 g/L KCl, 128 g/L NaCl, and 0.1% pancreatin, w/v). After mixing, the inoculated solution was incubated at 37°C for 180 min. The number of LAB exposed to simulated gastrointestinal juices was enumerated at 0 and 90 min for simulated gastric juice and 90 and 180 min for simulated intestinal juice. Enumeration was performed by the pour plate method using MRS agar containing 0.05% L-cysteine HCl (w/v) as the growth medium. Following the incubation, the colonies in each plate were counted and calculated as CFU/mL. The survival rate was calculated using the following equation:
A = average number of bacteria detected at 0 min.
B = average number of bacteria detected at 90 or 180 min.
3. Results
3.1. Microbiome analysis of Miang
The 16S rRNA gene and ITS2 amplicon sequence information for the Miang samples is shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. According to the 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence, Lactobacillales was dominant at the order level, except for one sample obtained from Phayao. The proportion of Lactobacillales was approximately 60–80% (Figure 2). One sample from Chiang Mai had the highest percentage of Lactobacillales (96.5%). The lowest percentage of Lactobacillales, which was found in the Phayao sample, was 47%. Rhodospirillales was the second most dominant after Lactobacillales at the order level. In one Miang sample obtained from Phayao, Rhodospirillales predominated at 51.6%. At the genus level, the Miang from Phayao contained 43% Lactobacillus and 51.5% Acetobacter. As this ratio was almost the same as that of Lactobacillales and Rhodospirillales, it was considered that the Lactobacillales comprised Lactobacillus and the Rhodospirillales comprised Acetobacter. Among the identifiable genera, the genus Lactobacillus was detected most frequently, followed by Acetobacter. The ratio of Lactobacillus was often approximately 40–60%. In recent years, the genus Lactobacillus has been reclassified into 25 new genera based on its genome (Zheng et al., 2020), but at the time of this study, the new classification of genera was unknown. In contrast to the genus Lactobacillus, the proportions of Lactococcus and Leuconostoc were low, at approximately 0–0.5% and 0–0.4%, respectively. Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, and Weissella accounted for 2.7, 18, and 3.5%, respectively, in only one Miang sample obtained in Lampag. The proportion of Lactobacillus in Miang was low, at 28.1%. Weissella was rarely found in the Miang samples. According to the ITS region amplicon sequence, Candida was the dominant species among the Miang fungal flora in 13 of 15 samples (Figure 3). In two samples, Debaryomyces was the dominant species. The percentage of Candida exceeded 90% in five samples. In Miang containing the highest percentage of Candida species, the percentage was 99.6%. The proportions of Debaryomyces in Miang were high (31.7, 45.9, and 51.9%). The dominant species of Candida differed depending on the isolation area. The dominant fungal species in Miang obtained from Phayao and Chiang Mai was Candida ethanolica, whereas in all other samples the dominant species was Candida boidinii. The proportion of Pichia among Miang samples was 33.3%. In addition, approximately 7–18% of Penicillium was found in three samples. In the present study, no difference was found in the microflora of Miang according to production region. In addition, there was no difference in flora between Miang-Faat and Miang-Som.
Table 1.
Code in this study | Type of sample | Description of sample | pH | Sampling region | Sampling sites |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M01 | Astringent miang | Steamed leaves in water and pickling salt, anaerobically fermented 2–3 days | 4 | Lampang | Mountainous plantation area in Ban Pa Miang, Mueang Pan district, Lampang Geographic coordinates: 18°49′53.1”N 99°23′15.5″E |
M02 | Sour miang | Steamed leaves in water and pickling salt, anaerobically fermented >15 days | 4 | ||
M03 | Sour miang | fermented for >1 month from vendor No. 4 | 4 | Phayao | “Mae Thong Khum” wet market, Phayao Geographic coordinates: 19°08′21.9”N 99°54′41.4″E |
M04 | Sour miang | Sour miang fermented for 2 days | 4 | Lang | House of local miang producer No. 4 on Doi Lang, Mae Ai district, Chiang Mai Geographic coordinates: 20°04′55.1”N 99°17′40.2″E |
M05 | Sour miang | Sour miang fermented for 15 days | 4 | ||
M06 | Sour miang | Sour miang fermented for 20 days | 4 | ||
M07 | Sour miang | Sour miang from vendor No. 4 | 4 | Chiang Mai | Mae Malai wet market, Mae Rim district, Chiang Mai Geographic coordinates: 19°05′41.3”N 98°56′09.9″E |
M08 | Astringent miang | Astringent miang from vendor No. 5 | 4 | ||
M09 | Sour miang | Sour miang from vendor No. 6 | 4 | The wet market opposite to 7th Artillery Battalion Prapinklao camp, Mae Rim district, Chiang Mai | |
M10 | Astringent miang | Astringent miang, fermented for 2 days | 4 | Pamiang | House of local miang producer No. 5, community supported by “Pa-Miang” Royal Project Development Center Doi Saket district, Chiang Mai |
M11 | Sour miang | Sour miang, fermented for 10 days | 4 | ||
M12 | Astringent miang | Astringent miang, fermented for 4 days | n.t. | Mon Ngo | House of local miang producer No. 6, Banlao Patana community supported by “Mon Ngo” Royal Project Development Center Mae Tang district, Chiang Mai Geographic coordinates: 19°10′37.2”N 98°47′50.5″E |
3.2. Isolation and identification of LAB from Miang samples
Fifty-two samples of Miang were used for LAB isolation using the dilution method and the spread plate technique on MRS agar supplemented with 0.03% (w/v) L-cysteine HCl. In total 1,181 purified isolates were obtained. All isolates were catalase-negative, Gram-positive rods. The results of identification by MALDI-TOF MS revealed that Lactiplantibacillus spp. accounted for the majority of the strains (Table 2). Out of 1,181 isolates, 889 isolates (75.28%) were identified as L. pentosus; 136 isolates (11.52%) as L. plantarum; 59 isolates (4.99%) as Levilactobacillus brevis; 39 isolates (3.30%) as Paucilactobacillus suebicus; 25 isolates (2.12%) as Lacticaseibacillus pantheris; 21 isolates (1.78%) as Secundilactobacillus collinoides; 4 isolates (0.34%) as Levilactobacillus acidifarinae; 3 isolates (0.25%) as Lacticaseibacillus paracasei; 3 isolates (0.25%) as Paucilactobacillus vaccinostercus, and 2 isolates (0.17%) as Lentilactobacillus parabuchneri. The score values of the identification ranged from 1.7–3–2. To obtain isolates with a high confidence level for species identification, only 450 isolates with a score ≥ 2.3 were selected for subsequent characterization of probiotic properties.
Table 2.
Sampling region of Miang | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lampang | Phayao | Lang | Chiang Mai | Pamiang | Mon | Nan | Total number | |
Lactiplantibacillus pentosus | 51 | 164 | 151 | 81 | 94 | 48 | 300 | 889 |
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum | 18 | 11 | 5 | 8 | 30 | 2 | 62 | 136 |
Levilactobacillus brevis | 17 | 18 | n.d. | 14 | n.d. | 1 | 9 | 59 |
Paucilactobacillus suebicus | 2 | 5 | 6 | 15 | 17 | n.d. | 4 | 39 |
Lacticaseibacillus pantheris | 10 | n.d. | 2 | 1 | 4 | n.d. | 8 | 25 |
Secundilactobacillus collinoides | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 19 | n.d. | n.d. | 2 | 21 |
Levilactobacillus acidifarinae | n.d. | 1 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 3 | 4 |
Lacticaseibacillus paracasei | 2 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 1 | 3 |
Paucilactobacillus vaccinostercus | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 1 | n.d. | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Lentilactobacillus parabuchneri | n.d. | 2 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 2 |
3.3. Hemolytic assay
Evaluation of the safety of potential probiotics was first performed by a hemolysis assay. Of the 1,181 LAB isolates, 994 isolates (84.2%) exhibited hemolytic activity with clear zones around the colonies when grown on blood agar, while 187 isolates (15.8%) did not show hemolytic activity.
3.4. Antibiotic resistance phenotypes
Table 3 shows the antibiotic resistance profiles of the 450 LAB isolates. All isolates were sensitive to ampicillin and chloramphenicol, and resistant to vancomycin. Most of the LAB isolates were resistant to aminoglycosides and clindamycin. It was found that 437 isolates (97.11%), 448 isolates (99.56%), 447 isolates (99.35%), and 413 isolates (91.78%) were resistant to gentamycin, kanamycin, streptomycin, and clindamycin, respectively. Eight isolates (1.78%) were resistant to tetracycline, whereas 2 isolates (0.44%) were resistant to erythromycin. Previous reports have indicated that antibiotic resistance to aminoglycosides (gentamycin, kanamycin, and streptomycin) is intrinsic in LAB isolates (Elkins and Mullis, 2004; Toomey et al., 2010; Nawaz et al., 2011; Solieri et al., 2014), as is vancomycin resistance (Gueimonde et al., 2013; Fraqueza, 2015; Delcour et al., 1999). Since intrinsic resistance is not transferable, this type of resistance is not a safety concern. By contrast, resistance to erythromycin, tetracycline, and clindamycin is classified as acquired resistance able to transfer via mobile genetic elements (Charteris et al., 1998b; van Hoek et al., 2011; Campedelli et al., 2018). Hence, LAB isolates with acquired antibiotic resistance were excluded from further analysis. In this study, only 35 isolates susceptible to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, tetracycline, and clindamycin were selected for further study (Table 4).
Table 3.
Types of antibiotic | Number of resistant isolates to each antibiotic |
---|---|
Ampicillin | 0 |
Tetracyclin | 8 |
Vancomycin | 450 |
Streptomycin | 447 |
Chloramphenicol | 0 |
Gentamicin | 437 |
Kanamycin | 448 |
Clindamycin | 413 |
Erythromycin | 2 |
Table 4.
Antibiotics | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | Code | Bacteria | Ampicillin | Vancomycin | Chloramphenicol | Erythromycin | Tetracycline | Gentamicin | Kanamycin | Streptomycin | Clindamycin |
1 | MSL 1–24 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
2 | MSL 15–3 | L. brevis | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
3 | MSL 17–22 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
4 | MSL 21–15 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
5 | MS 1–12 | L. paracasei | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
6 | MS 2–8 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
7 | MS 2–22 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
8 | MS 3–14 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
9 | MS 4–7 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
10 | MS 4–18 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
11 | MS 4–24 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
12 | MS 5–4 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
13 | MS 5–14 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
14 | MS 6–5 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
15 | MS 10–1 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
16 | MS 10–8 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
17 | MS 10–24 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
18 | MS 11–1 | L. brevis | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
19 | MS 13–23 | L. plantarum | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
20 | MS 13–24 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
21 | MS 14–4 | L. brevis | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
22 | MS 16–5 | L. paracasei | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
23 | MS 16–6 | L. paracasei | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
24 | MS 16–13 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
25 | MS 19–11 | L. brevis | S | R | S | S | S | S | R | R | S |
26 | HR 1–2 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
27 | HR 1–10 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | S | R | R | S |
28 | HR 2–5 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
29 | HR 4–1 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
30 | HR 7–3 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
31 | HR 8–2 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
32 | HR 12–1 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
33 | HR 18–5 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
34 | HR 19–2 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
35 | HR 29–2 | L. pentosus | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S |
S, sensitive; R, resistant.
3.5. Antimicrobial properties
The antimicrobial activities of 35 selected LAB isolates were assayed against nine pathogens using the well diffusion method. Most of the LAB isolates showed intermediate inhibitory activity (Tables 5, 6). No isolates could inhibit Candida albicans ATCC 10231. Twenty eight isolates (MSL 1–24, MSL 17–22, MSL 21–15, MS 1–12, MS 2–8, MS 2–22, MS 3–14, MS 4–7, MS 4–18, MS 4–24, MS 5–4, MS 6–5, MS 10–1, MS 10–8, MS 10–24, MS 13–23, MS 13–24, MS 16–5, MS 16–6, MS 16–13, MS 19–11, HR 1–2, HR 4–1, HR 7–3, HR 8–2, HR 12–1, HR 18–5, and HR 19–2) possessed inhibitory activity against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 (inhibition zone 11 to 26 mm), Escherichia coli ATCC 8379 (inhibition zone 11 to 20 mm), Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium TISTR 292 (inhibition zone 12 to 30 mm), Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis DMST 15676 (inhibition zone 12 to 23 mm), Listeria monocytogenes DMST 13802 (inhibition zone 11 to 20 mm), Staphylococcus epidermidis TISTR 518 (inhibition zone 11 to 22 mm), Propionibacterium acnes DMST 14961 (inhibition zone 11 to 18 mm), and Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175 (inhibition zone 9 to 18 mm). MSL 15–3, HR 2–9, and HR 29–2 exhibited inhibitory activity against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium TISTR 292, Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis DMST 15676, Listeria monocytogenes DMST 13802, Staphylococcus epidermidis TISTR 518, Propionibacterium acnes DMST 14961, and Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175, but not against Escherichia coli ATCC 8379; while MS 14–4 showed antagonistic activity only against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium TISTR 292. A comparison of the diameters of the inhibition zones revealed that most of the LAB isolates exhibited intermediate inhibitory activity (Table 6). This result was in agreement with the work of Klayraung and Okonogi (2009) who reported that Limosilactobacillus fermentum FTL10BR and Limosilactobacillus fermentum FTL2311 isolated from Miang had inhibitory activity toward Staphylococcus aureus DMST 6512 (inhibition zone 8 to 10 mm) and Listeria monocytogenes DMST 17303 (inhibition zone 10 mm).
Table 5.
Tested pathogens | No. of LAB isolates showing different levels of inhibitory activity | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
High | Intermediate | Low | No | |
Skin pathogens | ||||
C. albicans ATCC 10231 | – | – | – | 35 |
P. acnes DMST 14961 | – | 32 | 3 | |
S. epidermidis TISTR 518 | 3 | 29 | – | 3 |
Oral pathogenic bacterium | ||||
S. mutans ATCC 25175 | – | 29 | 3 | 3 |
Foodborne pathogenic bacteria | ||||
S. aureus ATCC 6538 | 12 | 20 | – | 3 |
E. coli ATCC 8379 | – | 29 | – | 6 |
S. typhimurium TISTR 292 | 10 | 23 | – | 2 |
S. enteritidis DMST 15676 | 5 | 27 | – | 3 |
L. monocytogenes DMST 13802 | 1 | 31 | – | 3 |
Table 6.
No. | Code | Bacteria | Diameter of clear zone (mm) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S. aureus | E. coli | S. typhimurium | S. enteritidis | L. monocytogenes | S. epidermidis | P. acnes | C. albicans | S. mutans | |||
1 | MSL 1–24 | L. pentosus | 18 | 17 | 26 | 20 | 17 | 18 | 12 | 0 | 13 |
2 | MSL 15–3 | L. brevis | 11 | 0 | 12 | 15 | 17 | 14 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
3 | MSL 17–22 | L. pentosus | 20 | 18 | 28 | 18 | 20 | 19 | 14 | 0 | 13 |
4 | MSL 21–15 | L. pentosus | 17 | 13 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 14 |
5 | MS 1–12 | L. paracasei | 19 | 14 | 15 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 0 | 10 |
6 | MS 2–8 | L. pentosus | 17 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 0 | 14 |
7 | MS 2–22 | L. pentosus | 26 | 17 | 21 | 20 | 16 | 19 | 15 | 0 | 13 |
8 | MS 3–14 | L. pentosus | 21 | 14 | 17 | 16 | 15 | 26 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
9 | MS 4–7 | L. pentosus | 21 | 15 | 19 | 18 | 15 | 18 | 15 | 0 | 12 |
10 | MS 4–18 | L. pentosus | 23 | 15 | 19 | 17 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 11 |
11 | MS 4–24 | L. pentosus | 22 | 15 | 20 | 18 | 16 | 18 | 14 | 0 | 11 |
12 | MS 5–4 | L. pentosus | 20 | 13 | 17 | 15 | 13 | 17 | 13 | 0 | 9 |
13 | MS 5–14 | L. pentosus | 20 | 11 | 15 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 0 | 13 |
14 | MS 6–5 | L. pentosus | 21 | 12 | 16 | 16 | 11 | 13 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
15 | MS 10–1 | L. pentosus | 25 | 15 | 19 | 19 | 26 | 20 | 16 | 0 | 13 |
16 | MS 10–8 | L. pentosus | 25 | 15 | 18 | 18 | 16 | 19 | 15 | 0 | 13 |
17 | MS 10–24 | L. pentosus | 24 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 19 | 15 | 0 | 14 |
18 | MS 11–1 | L. brevis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
19 | MS 13–23 | L. plantarum | 19 | 12 | 15 | 16 | 13 | 16 | 18 | 0 | 13 |
20 | MS 13–24 | L. pentosus | 25 | 19 | 30 | 22 | 20 | 22 | 14 | 0 | 15 |
21 | MS 14–4 | L. brevis | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
22 | MS 16–5 | L. paracasei | 12 | 16 | 27 | 19 | 15 | 18 | 13 | 0 | 14 |
23 | MS 16–6 | L. paracasei | 12 | 15 | 26 | 17 | 14 | 17 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
24 | MS 16–13 | L. pentosus | 18 | 14 | 15 | 15 | 12 | 15 | 13 | 0 | 11 |
25 | MS 19–11 | L. brevis | 29 | 16 | 21 | 20 | 17 | 19 | 13 | 0 | 10 |
26 | HR 1–2 | L. pentosus | 20 | 17 | 28 | 19 | 18 | 18 | 13 | 0 | 14 |
27 | HR 1–10 | L. pentosus | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
28 | HR 2–5 | L. pentosus | 20 | 0 | 27 | 19 | 18 | 19 | 14 | 0 | 12 |
29 | HR 4–1 | L. pentosus | 18 | 20 | 20 | 21 | 19 | 19 | 18 | 0 | 17 |
30 | HR 7–3 | L. pentosus | 12 | 12 | 18 | 20 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
31 | HR 8–2 | L. pentosus | 12 | 16 | 13 | 23 | 18 | 19 | 12 | 0 | 17 |
32 | HR 12–1 | L. pentosus | 18 | 17 | 15 | 23 | 20 | 21 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
33 | HR 18–5 | L. pentosus | 15 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 14 | 16 | 12 | 0 | 16 |
34 | HR 19–2 | L. pentosus | 16 | 13 | 16 | 15 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 0 | 17 |
35 | HR 29–2 | L. pentosus | 22 | 0 | 29 | 21 | 20 | 20 | 15 | 0 | 12 |
S. aureus ATCC 6538; E. coli ATCC 8379; S. typhimurium TISTR 292; S. enteritidis DMST 15676; L. monocytogenes DMST 13802; S. epidermidis TISTR 518; P. acnes DMST 14961; C. albicans ATCC 10231; S. mutans ATCC 25175.
3.6. In vitro tolerance to gastric and intestinal juices
The selected LAB isolates were investigated for tolerance to simulated gastric juice at pH 2 and pH 3, and simulated intestinal juice containing 0.3% (w/v) of bile salt. The results are presented in Table 7.
Table 7.
No. | Code | Bacteria | % survival | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Simulated gastric juice | Simulated intestinal juice | |||||
pH2 | pH3 | 90 min | 180 min | |||
1 | MSL 1–24 | L. pentosus | 0 | 71.5 | 98.8 | 102.2 |
2 | MSL 15–3 | L. brevis | 0 | 94.2 | 100.0 | 96.6 |
3 | MSL 17–22 | L. pentosus | 0 | 92.7 | 95.3 | 94.8 |
4 | MSL 21–15 | L. pentosus | 0 | 62.9 | 84.8 | 92.7 |
5 | MS 1–12 | L. paracasei | 0 | 100.5 | 105.6 | 105.1 |
6 | MS 2–8 | L. pentosus | 0 | 0.0 | 89.3 | 101.4 |
7 | MS 2–22 | L. pentosus | 0 | 84.1 | 96.9 | 95.3 |
8 | MS 3–14 | L. pentosus | 0 | 52.3 | 99.9 | 99.6 |
9 | MS 4–7 | L. pentosus | 0 | 50.9 | 98.7 | 98.7 |
10 | MS 4–18 | L. pentosus | 0 | 97.8 | 97.5 | 98.0 |
11 | MS 4–24 | L. pentosus | 0 | 96.4 | 91.2 | 83.1 |
12 | MS 5–4 | L. pentosus | 0 | 97.9 | 99.5 | 98.1 |
13 | MS 5–14 | L. pentosus | 0 | 86.5 | 93.8 | 93.8 |
14 | MS 6–5 | L. pentosus | 0 | 90.4 | 94.9 | 94.4 |
15 | MS 10–1 | L. pentosus | 0 | 100.4 | 102.4 | 103.8 |
16 | MS 10–8 | L. pentosus | 0 | 98.9 | 100.0 | 99.6 |
17 | MS 10–24 | L. pentosus | 0 | 99.7 | 97.0 | 97.0 |
18 | MS 11–1 | L. brevis | 0 | 87.1 | 98.5 | 98.4 |
19 | MS 13–23 | L. plantarum | 0 | 92.3 | 92.1 | 91.0 |
20 | MS 13–24 | L. pentosus | 0 | 78.7 | 95.6 | 95.3 |
21 | MS 14–4 | L. brevis | 0 | 92.9 | 99.3 | 99.9 |
22 | MS 16–5 | L. paracasei | 0 | 93.5 | 91.4 | 93.9 |
23 | MS 16–6 | L. paracasei | 0 | 94.8 | 98.3 | 94.8 |
24 | MS 16–13 | L. pentosus | 0 | 81.0 | 66.4 | 69.1 |
25 | MS 19–11 | L. brevis | 0 | 94.8 | 100.2 | 99.3 |
26 | HR 1–2 | L. pentosus | 0 | 93.0 | 102.1 | 101.0 |
27 | HR 1–10 | L. pentosus | 0 | 76.7 | 99.1 | 98.8 |
28 | HR 2–5 | L. pentosus | 0 | 86.6 | 102.7 | 97.9 |
29 | HR 4–1 | L. pentosus | 0 | 89.6 | 95.8 | 96.7 |
30 | HR 7–3 | L. pentosus | 0 | 100.4 | 97.3 | 96.6 |
31 | HR 8–2 | L. pentosus | 0 | 80.9 | 98.9 | 98.9 |
32 | HR 12–1 | L. pentosus | 0 | 89.4 | 100.7 | 101.3 |
33 | HR 18–5 | L. pentosus | 0 | 93.2 | 94.4 | 97.2 |
34 | HR 19–2 | L. pentosus | 0 | 90.9 | 96.8 | 97.4 |
35 | HR 29–2 | L. pentosus | 0 | 58.0 | 120.3 | 126.0 |
Simulated gastric juice = normal saline containing 0.3% pepsin. Simulated intestinal juice = normal saline containing 0.3% bile salt and 0.1% pancreatin.
It was found that none of the 35 LAB isolates could survive after 90 min exposure to simulated gastric juice at pH 2. A possible explanation for this phenomenon might be that this pH is harsher than the natural environmental niche from which these LAB were isolated. The pH values of the fermented liquid of Miang samples were between 3 and 4 implying that Lactobacillus in Miang might not survive in a pH lower than 3. When tested with simulated gastric juice at pH 3, the survival rates of the 34 isolates were higher than those at pH 2.0. Nineteen isolates (MSL 15–3, MSL 17–22, MS 1–12, MS 4–18, MS 4–24, MS 5–4, MS 6–5, MS 10–1, MS 10–8, MS 10–24, MS 13–23, MS 14–4, MS 16–5, MS 16–6, MS 19–11, HR 1–2, HR 7–3, HR 18–5, and HR 19–2) showed survival rates of ≥90%. MSL 1–12, MS 10–1, and HR 7–3 showed maximum tolerance, with 100% survival, whereas MS 2–8 was unable to survive.
Based on their ability to tolerate simulated intestinal juice at 90 and 180 min contact time, the selected LAB isolates could be categorized into three groups: (1) those with a higher survival rate at 180 min than 90 min (e.g., MSL 21–15 and MS 2–8); (2) those with a higher survival rate at 90 min than 180 min (e.g., MS 4–24); and (3) those with comparable survival rates at 90 min and 180 min (32 isolates). HR 29–2 exhibited the highest tolerance with 100% survival, whereas MS 16–13 only showed survival of 66%. Although LAB isolates were killed at pH 2, the survival of 34 LAB isolates at pH 3 in the presence of 0.3% bile salts for 3 h was sufficient to be regarded as probiotic candidates. It should be noted that MS 2–8 was excluded because it did not survive at pH 3.
4. Discussion
In this study, microbiome analysis was first performed on Miang obtained from seven different production areas in northern Thailand. No differences were found in the Miang microbiota between the production regions. Currently, while it is possible to identify microorganisms in fermented foods, distinguishing local products from similar items produced in other regions remains challenging. Despite minor regional variations in the production process of Miang, the key fermentation conditions—such as temperature, type of tea leaves, and anaerobic environment—are consistent across regions. These consistent fermentation conditions are likely to lead to similar microbial floras. Consequently, the similarity in fermentation conditions contributes to the similarity observed in the microbial flora. In most Miang, LAB of the genera Lactobacillus and Acetobacter were dominant. These two bacteria are important for the fermentation of Miang. A previous study reported that 39.7–79.5% of Miang flora, prepared in Papae district, Chiang Mai, belonged to the family Lactobacillaceae, and they concluded that Lactobacillus (29.2–77.2%) and Acetobacter (3.8–22.8%), and the unicellular fungi Candida (72.5–89.0%) and Pichia (8.1–14.9%) are important microorganisms for Miang fermentation (Unban et al., 2020). The study by Unban et al. (2020) was conducted separately at approximately the same time as the present study, and the results are largely consistent. All findings therefore indicate that Lactobacillus and Acetobacter are important bacteria and Candida is an important fungus in Miang fermentation. Additionally, according to the identification of isolated LAB, it was clear that Lactiplantibacillus pentosus is a dominant species among Miang samples. This finding was different from previous studies that reported Lactiplantibacillus. plantarum to be the dominant species in all Miang fermentations (Chaikaew et al., 2017; Okada et al., 1986). It should be noted that certain species (Levilactobacillus brevis, Secundilactobacillus collinoides, Levilactobacillus acidifarinae, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, Paucilactobacillus vaccinostercus, and Lentilactobacillus parabuchneri) detected in Miang samples in the present study, were not observed in other studies (Tanasupawat et al., 2007; Okada et al., 1986). These inconsistent findings might be due to differences in sampling sites, the medium used for isolation, the criteria for colony selection, or the number of isolates or methods used for identification.
Debaryomyces and Pichia may also be necessary for Miang production. Interestingly, the microbial composition that appears to be important for the fermentation of Miang differs from that of Japanese post-fermented teas. The genus Lactiplantibacillus was dominant in Awa-bancha, and Paucilactobacillus, Secundilactobacillus, and Ligilactobacillus were also identified. Additionally, Klebsiella spp. are frequently found. In one case, the proportion of Klebsiella was close to 50%. However, the proportion of Acetobacter was low and its detection was rare (Nishioka et al., 2021). In Ishizuchi-kurocha, another Japanese post-fermented tea, Lactobacillus was reported to be dominant, and Pseudomonas and Klebsiella were often also present, whereas Acetobacter spp. were rarely found (Ohno et al., 2024). The dominant fungal flora of Ishizuchi-kurocha was Aspergillus spp. (Ohno et al., 2024; Mizuno et al., 2020); however, the fungal flora of Awa-bancha remains to be determined. The production method differs between Miang and Ishizuchi-kurocha. Ishizuchi-kurocha is produced by a two-step fermentation. The primary fermentation is aerobic fermentation mainly mediated by Aspergillus spp., followed by anaerobic fermentation mainly mediated by Lactiplantibacillus. During anaerobic fermentation of Ishizuchi-kurocha, Pichia spp. were detected (Mizuno et al., 2020; Yamamoto et al., 2019). Aspergillus spp. are important fungi in Japanese post-fermented teas. Three of the four types of traditional Japanese post-fermented teas are fermented by Aspergillus. Whereas, Candida spp. were not dominant in any of the Japanese post-fermented teas (Ohno et al., 2024; Mizuno et al., 2020). The fungal flora involved in the fermentation process differed substantially between the Japanese and Thai post-fermented teas. Aspergillus flavus is known to produce aflatoxins in tropical regions (Ehrlich et al., 2007). The invasion of A. flavus into fermented foods in the tropics poses a health risk. Therefore, in tropical regions, the use of Aspergillus spp. in food is risky. This has meant that while Aspergillus is widely used for fermentation in temperate zones, it has generally been avoided in the tropics. The LAB isolated from Miang showed some characteristic properties that may be advantageous for their application as probiotics. Some of the isolated LAB strains showed antibiotic resistance, antimicrobial activity against pathogens, and tolerance to gastrointestinal juices. Isolated LAB could not survive in gastric juice at pH 2, and this reduction of survival of LAB at pH 2 has previously been reported elsewhere. The viable counts of many strains of L. brevis and L. plantarum isolated from traditional Malaysian fermented Bambangan were dramatically reduced from 7.6–8 log CFU/mL to <2 log CFU/mL after exposure to phosphate buffer at pH 2 for 2 h (Ng et al., 2015). However, our findings are contradictory to those of Unban et al. (2021) who demonstrated that Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lactiplantibacillus pentosus isolated from Miang were able to resist simulated gastric juice at pH 2 with a survival rate > 80%. In addition, Klayraung and Okonogi (2009) found that Limosilactobacillus fermentum from Miang exhibited a survival rate in simulated gastric juice at pH 2 of >50%. This discrepancy may be related to the fact that the pH of the Miang sampled in this study, which was the source of the LAB analyzed, was approximately 4.
The properties of LAB are affected by their growth environment. In particular, the influence of symbiotic microorganisms is significant. In Ishizuchi-kurocha, metabolites and fermentation heat caused by Aspergillus are considered to be involved in the selection of LAB involved in lactate fermentation. Although Lactiplantibacillus plantarum isolated from Ishizuchi-kurocha is highly resistant to penicillin, the penicillin tolerance of Lactiplantibacillus pentosus isolated from Awa-bancha, which does not include fungal fermentation, was lower (Horie et al., 2019a). However, many LAB strains isolated from Miang exhibited broad-spectrum antibiotic resistance. This antibiotic resistance may involve metabolites from the fungal flora of Miang. Moreover, the LAB isolated from Miang exhibited antibacterial activity. A previous study also reported that Limosilactobacillus fermentum isolated from Miang exhibited antibacterial activity against pathogens such as Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi, Shigella sonnei, and Staphylococcus aureus (Klayraung and Okonogi, 2009). These results suggest that LAB in Miang prevent the growth of pathogenic bacteria during fermentation. The production method for Miang established by our predecessors may have selected LAB with antibacterial activity. By contrast, the LAB isolated from Miang did not show antifungal activity against Candida spp. The lack of antifungal activity against Candida may be because Candida is the dominant species in the fungal flora of Miang and coexists with LAB.
In this study, several promising probiotic strains among the LAB isolated from Miang were identified. The properties of these strains may be closely related to the microorganisms involved in Miang fermentation. These LAB strains are expected to be used as probiotics for application within the food industry in the future. On the other hand, it remains to be determined whether the probiotic activity observed in this study is present during the actual fermentation process of tea leaves in Miang. Furthermore, it needs to be explored whether similar probiotic effects can be achieved in the food industry, such as during fermentation processes using milk as a substrate.
5. Conclusion
Lactobacillaceae bacteria were the most dominant species involved in Miang fermentation, regardless of region. At the species level, Lactiplantibacillus pentosus dominates, but regional diversity was observed. In this study, 2.6% of all isolates were found to have probiotic potential. In practical food applications, both functionality and taste are crucial attributes. Future research must focus on enhancing the added value and palatability of fermented foods, such as yogurt and pickles.
Acknowledgments
We thank Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Data availability statement
Original dataets are available in a publicly accessible repository: The original contributions presented in the study are publicly available. This data can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject. Accession No.:PRJDB18930.
Author contributions
MH: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SR: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. YO: Data curation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- Abdullahi A. D., Kodchasee P., Unban K., Pattananandecha T., Saenjum C., Kanpiengjai A., et al. (2021). Comparison of phenolic contents and scavenging activities of Miang extracts derived from filamentous and non-filamentous Fungi-based fermentation processes. Antioxidants. 10:1144. doi: 10.3390/antiox10071144, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abe M., Takaoka N., Idemoto Y., Takagi C., Imai T., Nakasaki K. (2008). Characteristic fungi observed in the fermentation process for Puer tea. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 124, 199–203. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angelakis E., Million M., Henry M., Raoult D. (2011). Rapid and accurate bacterial identification in probiotics and yoghurts by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. J. Food Sci. 76, M568–M572. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02369.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bouchibane M., Zabouri Y., Cheriguene A., Kaced A., Chougrani F., Saada D. A. (2022). Application of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to identify lactic acid Bacteria isolated from artisanal dairy products in Algeria. Asian J. Dairy Food Res. 41, 377–383. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.DRF-280 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cafiso V., Bertuccio T., Spina D., Purrello S., Blandino G., Stefani S. (2012). A novel δ-hemolysis screening method for detecting heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50, 1742–1744. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06307-11, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campedelli I., Mathur H., Salvetti E., Clarke S., Rea M. C., Torriani S., et al. (2018). Genus-wide assessment of antibiotic resistance in Lactobacillus spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, e01738–e01718. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01738-18, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chaikaew S., Baipong S., Sone T., Kanpiengjai A., Chui-Chai N., Asano K., et al. (2017). Diversity of lactic acid bacteria from Miang, a traditional fermented tea leaf in northern Thailand and their tannin-tolerant ability in tea extract. J. Microbiol. 55, 720–729. doi: 10.1007/s12275-017-7195-8, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charteris W. P., Kelly P. M., Morelli L., Collins J. K. (1998a). Antibiotic susceptibility of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus species. J. Food Prot. 61, 1636–1643. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-61.12.1636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charteris W. P., Kelly P. M., Morelli L., Collins J. K. (1998b). Development and application of an in vitro methodology to determine the transit tolerance of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species in the upper human gastrointestinal tract. J. Appl. Microbiol. 84, 759–768. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00407.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delcour J., Ferain T., Deghorain M., Palumbo E., Hols P. (1999). The biosynthesis and functionality of the cell-wall of lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 76, 159–184. doi: 10.1023/A:1002089722581 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dušková M., Šedo O., Kšicová K., Zdráhal Z., Karpíšková R. (2012). Identification of lactobacilli isolated from food by genotypic methods and MALDI-TOF MS. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 159, 107–114. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.07.029, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) (2018). Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms. EFSA J. 16:e05206. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ehrlich K. C., Kobbeman K., Montalbano B. G., Cotty P. J. (2007). Aflatoxin-producing Aspergillus species from Thailand. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 114, 153–159. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.08.007, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elkins C. A., Mullis L. B. (2004). Bile-mediated aminoglycoside sensibility in Lactobacillus species likely results from increased membrane permeability attributable to cholic acid. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 7200–7209. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.12.7200-7209.2004, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fraqueza M. J. (2015). Antibiotic resistance of lactic acid bacteria isolated from dry-fermented sausages. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 212, 76–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.04.035, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gueimonde M., Sánchez B. G., de Los Reyes-Gavilán C., Margolles A. (2013). Antibiotic resistance in probiotic bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 4:202. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00202, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo W., Lu Y., Luo S., Sakata K. (2004). Dark tea. A tea made via microbial fermentation process. Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi 51, 323–331. doi: 10.3136/nskkk.51.323 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Horie M., Nara K., Sugino S., Umeno A., Yoshida Y. (2016). Comparison of antioxidant activities among four kinds of Japanese traditional fermented tea. Food Sci. Nutr. 5, 639–645. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.442, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horie M., Ohmiya Y., Ohmori T. (2023). Analysis of D-amino acid in Japanese post-fermented tea, Ishizuchi-kurocha. Biosci. Microbiota Food Health. 42, 254–263. doi: 10.12938/bmfh.2023-005, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horie M., Ruengsomwong S., Wannissorn B. (2020). Field research for production method of Miang: post-fermented tea in Thailand. Japan J. Food Eng. 21, 125–137. doi: 10.11301/jsfe.20573 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Horie M., Sato H., Tada A., Nakamura S., Sugino S., Tabei Y., et al. (2019a). Regional characteristics of Lactobacillus plantarum group strains isolated from two kinds of Japanese post-fermented teas, Ishizuchi-kurocha and Awa-bancha. Biosci. Microbiota Food Health. 38, 11–22. doi: 10.12938/bmfh.18-005, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horie M., Tada A., Kanamoto N., Tamai T., Fukuda N., Sugino S., et al. (2019b). Evaluation of lactic acid bacteria and component change during fermentation of Ishizuchi-kurocha. J. Food Process. Preserv. 43:e14186. doi: 10.1111/jfpp.14186 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ihrmark K., Bödeker I. T., Cruz-Martinez K., Friberg H., Kubartova A., Schenck J., et al. (2012). New primers to amplify the fungal ITS2 region--evaluation by 454-sequencing of artificial and natural communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 82, 666–677. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01437.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jensen G. S., Beaman J. L., He Y., Guo Z., Sun H. (2016). Reduction of body fat and improved lipid profile associated with daily consumption of a Puer tea extract in a hyperlipidemic population: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin. Interv. Aging 11, 367–376. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S94881, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kačániová M., Kunová S., Sabo J., Ivanišová E., Žiarovská J., Felšöciová S., et al. (2020). Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria in wine production by MALDi-TOF MS Biotyper. Acta Horticul. Regiotecturae 23, 21–24. doi: 10.2478/ahr-2020-0006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kanak E. K., Yolmaz S. Ӧ. (2019). Maldi-tof mass spectrometry for the identification and detection of antimicrobial activity of lactic acid bacteria isolated from local cheeses. Food Sci. Technol. 39, 462–469. doi: 10.1590/fst.19418 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kangwan N., Kongkarnka S., Boonkerd N., Unban K., Shetty K., Khanongnuch C. (2022). Protective effect of probiotics isolated from traditional fermented tea leaves (Miang) from northern Thailand and role of synbiotics in ameliorating experimental ulcerative colitis in mice. Nutrients 14:227. doi: 10.3390/nu14010227, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kazemipoor M., Radzi C. W. J. W. M., Begum K., Yaze I. (2012). Screening of antibacterial activity of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fermented vegetables against food borne pathogens. [Epubh ahead of preprint]. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1206.6366 [DOI]
- Khanongnuch C., Unban K., Kanpiengjai A. (2017). Recent research advances and ethano-botanical history of miang, a traditional fermented tea (Camellia sinensis var. assamica) of Nothern Thailand. J. Ethn. Foods. 4, 135–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jef.2017.08.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Klayraung S., Okonogi S. (2009). Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of acid and bile resistant strains of Lactobacillus fermentum isolated from Miang. Braz. J. Microbiol. 40, 757–766. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822009000400005, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y., Luo L., Luo Y., Zhang J., Wang X., Sun K., et al. (2020). Prebiotic properties of green and dark tea contribute to protective effects in chemical-induced colitis in mice: a Ffecal microbiota transplantation study. J. Agric. Food Chem. 68, 6368–6380. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c02336, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu H., Liu F., Zhu Q., Zhang M., Li T., Chen J., et al. (2017). Aflatoxin B1 can be complexed with oxidised tea polyphenols and the absorption of the complexed aflatoxin B1 is inhibited in rats. J. Sci. Food Agric. 97, 1910–1915. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7994, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lyu C., Chen C., Ge F., Liu D., Zhao S., Chen D. (2013). A preliminary metagenomic study of puer tea during pile fermentation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 93, 3165–3174. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6149, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mizuno T., Iwahashi H., Horie M. (2020). Identification of microbial flora associated with fermentation of Ishizuchi-Kurocha. J. Japan. Soc. Taste Technol. 19, 46–52. doi: 10.11274/bimi.19.1_46 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mo H. Z., Zhang H., Wu Q. H., Hu L. B. (2013). Inhibitory effects of tea extract on aflatoxin production by aspergillus flavus. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 56, 462–466. doi: 10.1111/lam.12073, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nacef M., Chevalier M., Chollet S., Drider D., Flahaut C. (2017). MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for the identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from a French cheese: the Maroilles. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 247, 2–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.07.005, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nawaz M., Wang J., Zhou A., Ma C., Wu X., Moore J. E., et al. (2011). Characterization and transfer of antibiotic resistance in lactic acid bacteria from fermented food products. Curr. Microbiol. 62, 1081–1089. doi: 10.1007/s00284-010-9856-2, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ng S. Y., Koon S. S., Padam B. S., Chye F. Y. (2015). Evaluation of probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional Malaysian fermented Bambangan (Mangifera pajang). CyTA J. Food. 13, 1–10. doi: 10.1080/19476337.2015.1020342 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nishioka H., Iwahashi H., Horie M. (2022). Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the Japanese post-fermented tea Awa-bancha. J. Japan. Soc. Taste Technol. 21, 12–19. doi: 10.11274/bimi.21.1_12 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nishioka H., Ohno T., Iwahashi H., Horie M. (2021). Diversity of lactic acid bacteria involved in the fermentation of Awa-bancha. Microbes Environ. 36:ME21029. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME21029, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohno T., Shinozuka S., Nishioka H., Toyotome T., Iwahashi H., Horie M. (2024). Effect of fermentation conditions on microorganisms during fermentation of Ishizuchi-kurocha. J. Japan. Soc. Taste Technol. 23, 19–33. [Google Scholar]
- Okada S., Daengsubha W., Uchimura T., Ohara N., Kozaki M. (1986). Flora of lactic acid bacteria in miang produced in northern Thailand. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 32, 57–65. doi: 10.2323/jgam.32.57 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shokryazdan P., Sieo C. C., Kalavathy R., Liang J. B., Alitheen N. B., Faseleh Jahromi M., et al. (2014). Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains with antimicrobial activity against some human pathogenic strains. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014:927268. doi: 10.1155/2014/927268, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Solieri L., Bianchi A., Mottolese G., Lemmetti F., Giudici P. (2014). Tailoring the probiotic potential of non-starter Lactobacillus strains from ripened Parmigiano Reggiano cheese by in vitro screening and principal component analysis. Food Microbiol. 38, 240–249. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2013.10.003, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanasupawat S., Pakdeeto A., Thawai C., Yukphan P., Okada S. (2007). Identification of lactic acid bacteria from fermented tea leaves (Miang) in Thailand and proposals of Lactobacillus thailandensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus camelliae sp. nov., and Pediococcus siamensis sp. nov. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 53, 7–15. doi: 10.2323/jgam.53.7, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toomey N., Bolton D., Fanning S. (2010). Characterisation and transferability of antibiotic resistance genes from lactic acid bacteria isolated from Irish pork and beef abattoirs. Res. Microbiol. 161, 127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2009.12.010, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Unban K., Chaichana W., Baipong S., Abdullahi A. D., Kanpiengjai A., Shetty K., et al. (2021). Probiotic and antioxidant properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from indigenous fermented tea leaves (Miang) of North Thailand and promising application in synbiotic formulation. Fermentation. 7:195. doi: 10.3390/fermentation7030195 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Unban K., Khatthongngam N., Pattananandecha T., Saenjum C., Shetty K., Khanongnuch C. (2020). Microbial community dynamics during the non-filamentous fungi growth-based fermentation process of Miang, a traditional fermented tea of North Thailand and their product characterizations. Front. Microbiol. 11:1515. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01515, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Hoek A. H., Mevius D., Guerra B., Mullany P., Roberts A. P., Aarts H. J. (2011). Acquired antibiotic resistance genes: an overview. Front. Microbiol. 2:203. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00203, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamamoto M., Horie M., Fukushima M., Toyotome T. (2019). Culture-based analysis of fungi in leaves after the primary and secondary fermentation processes during Ishizuchi-kurocha production and lactate assimilation of P. kudriavzevii. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 306:108263. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108263, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoshida S., Ohhata E., Masuda T., Okada S., Miyazaki Y., Yamasita T., et al. (2010). Oral administration of Lactobacillus plantarum FG4-4 ameliorates the development of dermatitis in atopic dermatitis model NC/Nga mice. Japan. J. Lactic Acid Bacteria 21, 214–220. doi: 10.4109/jslab.21.214 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng J., Wittouck S., Salvetti E., Franz C. M. A. P., Harris H. M. B., Mattarelli P., et al. (2020). A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 70, 2782–2858. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004107, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Original dataets are available in a publicly accessible repository: The original contributions presented in the study are publicly available. This data can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject. Accession No.:PRJDB18930.