Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 8;25:895. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08016-6

Table 5.

Approaches, outcomes, implants, and complications in DIP arthrodesis in the literature

Authors
Year
Digits (n) Incision Implants Union rate, (%) Union time
(months)
F/U period
(months)
Complications (%)
Woo et al. (2022) [4] 15 Y-shaped Multiple screws 100 5.67 5.67

Skin necrosis (0)

Nail deformity (0)

Screw removal(13)

Auzias et al. (2019) [18] 22 H-shaped Lync implant 91 4.2 15

Skin necrosis (0)

Nail deformity (0)

Implant loosening (14)

Cox et al. (2014) [6] 48 Transverse Acutrak AcuTwist 94 12 12

Skin necrosis (0)

Nail deformity (0)

Nonunion(6)

Fracture (2)

Song et al. (2012) [16] 23 H-shaped Acutrak screw 100 2.5 18

Skin necrosis (0)

Nail deformity (0)

Fixation failure (4)

Han et al.

(2014) [2]

9 H-shaped Wiring & K-wire 100 1.9 19.6

Skin necrosis (0)

Nail deformity (0)

Wire removal(11)

Iwamoto el al.

(2013) [19]

28 Y-shaped Oblique Acutrak screw 96 2.75 12

Skin necrosis (0)

Nail deformity (0)

Nonunion(4)

Villani et al

(2012) [17]

102 Transverse Arex SCRU2 screw 100 3–6 26

Skin necrosis (0)

Nail deformity (0)

Prominent hardware(2)

CRPSa(1)

Bone callus(1)

Present study

(2023)

36 Smile Dart-fire screw 97 3.41 9.84

Skin necrosis (0)

Nail deformity (0)

Nonunion(3)

aCRPS Complex regional pain syndrome