Skip to main content
BMC Psychiatry logoLink to BMC Psychiatry
. 2024 Nov 7;24:780. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06217-w

Empathy fatigue among physicians and its influencing factors: a cross-sectional survey from Southwest China

Qing Ye 1, Xuemin Zhong 2,3, Qiang Zhou 1, Hua Liu 1,, Gongbo Li 3,
PMCID: PMC11546530  PMID: 39511514

Abstract

Background

Empathy fatigue refers to the excessive empathy required of medical staff in the process of helping patients, which can produce traumatic experiences and emotional exhaustion. Severe empathy fatigue can even lead to medical disputes and errors, exacerbating increasingly tense doctor–patient relationships. Most studies on empathy fatigue focus on nurses, with few studies on physicians.

Methods

A cross-sectional questionnaire was used to assess empathy fatigue among physicians in public tertiary general hospitals in southwest China using convenience sampling.

Results

A total of 562 physicians participated in the survey; average empathy satisfaction scores were 32.1 ± 6.85, 28.2 ± 5.30, and 26.2 ± 6.04 for empathy satisfaction disorder, job burnout, and secondary traumatic stress domains, respectively. We identified 291 (51.8%) physicians with severe empathy fatigue. Working two or three night shifts per week was associated with severe empathy fatigue. In total, 424 (75.4%) physicians had thoughts of resigning. Weekly rest time, empathic satisfaction disorder, job burnout, and secondary traumatic stress disorder influenced thoughts of resigning.

Conclusions

The majority of hospital physicians experience empathy fatigue and have considered resigning; this study provides reference data that demonstrate the extent of this issue. Efforts are urgently needed to address empathy fatigue in physicians and, therefore, increase physician retention.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-024-06217-w.

Keywords: empathy fatigue, empathy satisfaction, job burnout, secondary stress trauma, hospital physicians

Background

Empathy fatigue refers to exhaustion and dysfunction caused by prolonged exposure to work-related and empathic stress [13]. As members of a caring profession, medical staff experience a high incidence of empathy fatigue. Studies have found that empathy fatigue can cause a variety of physical and mental health problems, reducing productivity and motivation. Severe empathy fatigue can even lead to medical disputes and errors, exacerbating increasingly strained doctor–patient relationships [4, 5].

Most studies on empathy fatigue have focused on nurses working in oncology, psychiatry, and emergency; few studies have explored empathy fatigue among physicians [68]. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, healthcare professionals worked long hours at high intensities, and were frequently exposed to traumatic situations such patient death and the anxiety and pain of infected individuals [9]. They were also at a high risk of infection, creating a conflict between the performance of work duties and their personal health and safety [10, 11]. Although the end of the COVID-19 pandemic has been declared, the stress on ’physicians has not diminished [1214]. Many medical staff report experiencing a lack of physical strength, energy, and empathy [12, 14]. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate empathy fatigue in clinicians in southwest China and provide empirical evidence for its prevention and treatment.

Methods

Study design

A survey of licensed clinicians working in public tertiary general hospitals in southwest China was conducted using convenience and snowball sampling between February 18 and March 31, 2024. We recruited doctors in Chongqing and Sichuan Province who had finished their undergraduate internship and completed standardized training for doctors, working in public tertiary general hospitals for more than 1 year. WeChat (2012 edition; Changsha Ranxing Information Technology Co., Ltd., Changsha, China) was used for data collection. This study was approved by the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University.

Questionnaire design

The questionnaire comprised two sections, a self-compiled general situation questionnaire and a clinician empathy fatigue scale.

In the basic information section, a self-compiled general situation questionnaire included questions on sex, age, title, position, education, marital status, working years, department, weekly rest time, night shift frequency, and income. The empathy fatigue section included a version of the Professional Quality of Life Scale as revised by Stamm [15] and translated into Chinese by Chen and Wang [16]. The scale comprises three domains, empathy satisfaction, job burnout, and secondary traumatic stress, with 10 items in each domain for a total of 30 items. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale, which assigns points according to occurrence frequency from 1 point for “no” to 5 points for “always”; items 14, 15, 17, and 29 use this scale in reverse. The total possible score for each domain is 50 points, with critical values of < 37, > 27, and > 17 points for the empathy satisfaction, job burnout, and secondary traumatic stress domains, respectively. Scores that breached the critical value in one, two, or three domains were classified as mild, moderate, or severe empathy fatigue, respectively. In this study, the Cronbach α coefficient was between 0.836 and 0.931. A reliability evaluation revealed a reliability coefficient of 0.923 and a validity of 0.939.

Statistical analysis

R software version 4.1.1 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) was used for data processing and statistical analyses. Enumeration data are expressed as frequency and component ratios. Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare the scores for empathy satisfaction (< 37 and ≥ 37 points), job burnout (< 27 and ≥ 27 points), and secondary traumatic stress (< 17 and ≥ 17 points) in clinicians categorized by sex, age, marital status, whether they raise children, education, professional title, duty, years of work, department, weekly rest time, night shift frequency, and income. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare clinicians with different degrees of empathy fatigue (normal, mild, moderate, or severe). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was performed with clinician characteristics as independent variables and empathy satisfaction (< 37 points = 1; ≥ 37 points = 0), job burnout (< 27 points = 0; ≥ 27 points = 1), and secondary traumatic stress (< 17 points = 0; ≥ 17 points = 1) as dependent variables. Multivariate disordered logistic regression analysis was also performed with clinician characteristics as independent variables, and the degree of empathy fatigue (mild = 1; moderate = 2; severe = 3) and thoughts of resigning (rarely or never = 1; sometimes = 2; often or always = 3) as dependent variables. Independent variables were screened using backward stepwise regression, with a test level of α = 0.05.

Results

Clinician characteristics

A total of 562 physicians, with an average age of 37.3 ± 6.35 years, participated in the survey; 55.2% of participants were female, 85.4% were married, 30.6% were aged over 41 years, 27.6% had been working for more than 15 years, and 39.0% had two rest days a week (Table 1).

Table 1.

Clinician characteristics

Characteristic Category n (%)
Sex Female 310 (55.2)
Male 252 (44.8)
Age(years) 31 ~ 40 300 (53.4)
≥ 41 172 (30.6)
< 30 90 (16.0)
Marital status Unmarried 82 (14.6)
Married 480 (85.4)
Raising children Yes 435 (77.4)
No 127 (22.6)
Education Bachelor’s degree or below 188 (33.5)
Masters 319 (56.8)
Doctorate 55 (9.8)
Professional title Resident/attending physician 110 (19.6)
Associate chief physician/chief physician 452 (80.4)
Duty Director/deputy director 108 (19.2)
Medical team leader 104 (18.5)
None 350 (62.3)
Years of work < 5 109 (19.4)
5–10 134 (23.8)
11–15 164 (29.2)
> 15 155 (27.6)
Department Internal medicine 391 (69.6)
Surgery 86 (15.3)
Other 85 (15.1)
Weekly rest time 2 days 219 (39.0)
1 day 230 (40.9)
None 113 (20.1)
Night shift frequency Once a month or less 138 (24.6)
2–3 times/month 46 (8.2)
Once a week 246 (43.8)
2–3 times/week 132 (23.5)
Income(CNY) < 5000 42 (7.5)
5000–10,000 266 (47.3)
10,000–15,000 186 (33.1)
> 15,000 68 (12.1)
Thoughts of resigning Never/rarely 138 (24.5)
Sometimes 254 (45.2)
Often/always 170 (30.3)

Empathy satisfaction

The average empathy satisfaction score was 32.1 ± 6.85; in 562 physicians, 417 (74.20%) physicians had empathy satisfaction disorder. Sex, age, professional title, duty, years of work, night shift frequency, and income all influenced empathy fatigue. Logistic regression analysis identified weekly rest time as an influential factor for empathy fatigue (odds ratio [OR], 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33–5.15) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Single factor analysis of physician empathy satisfaction

Factor Category < 37 points ≥ 37 points P-value
Sex Female 243 (58.3) 67 (46.2) 0.016
Male 174 (41.7) 78 (53.8)
Age (years) 31 ~ 40 237 (56.8) 62 (42.8) < 0.001
≥ 41 106 (25.4) 66 (45.5)
≤ 30 74 (17.7) 17 (11.7)
Marital status Unmarried 66 (15.8) 16 (11.0) 0.203
Married 351 (84.2) 129 (89.0)
Raising children Yes 317 (76.0) 118 (81.4) 0.225
No 100 (24.0) 27 (18.6)
Education Bachelor’s degree or below 138 (33.1) 50 (34.5) 0.387
Masters 242 (58.0) 77 (53.1)
Doctorate 37 (8.9) 18 (12.4)
Professional title Resident/attending physician 91 (21.8) 19 (13.1) 0.031
Associate chief physician/chief physician 326 (78.2) 126 (86.9)
Duty Director/deputy director 64 (15.3) 44 (30.3) < 0.001
Medical team leader 72 (17.3) 32 (22.1)
None 281 (67.4) 69 (47.6)
Years of work < 5 91 (21.8) 18 (12.4) < 0.001
5–10 104 (24.9) 30 (20.7)
11–15 128 (30.7) 36 (24.8)
> 15 94 (22.5) 61 (42.1)
Department Internal medicine 292 (70.0) 99 (68.3) 0.508
Surgery 66 (15.8) 20 (13.8)
Other 59 (14.1) 26 (17.9)
Weekly rest time 2 days 152 (36.5) 67 (46.2) 0.105
1 day 176 (42.2) 54 (37.2)
None 89 (21.3) 24 (16.6)
Night shift frequency Once a month or less 83 (19.9) 55 (37.9) < 0.001
2–3 times/month 28 (6.7) 18 (12.4)
Once a week 191 (45.8) 55 (37.9)
2–3 times/week 115 (27.6) 17 (11.7)
Income (CNY)) < 5000 33 (7.9) 9 (6.2) < 0.001
5000–10,000 215 (51.6) 51 (35.2)
10,000–15,000 134 (32.1) 52 (35.9)
> 15,000 35 (8.4) 33 (22.8)

Data are expressed as number (percentage)

Job burnout

The average job burnout score was 28.2 ± 5.30; of the 562 physicians surveyed, 319 (56.8%) clinicians had job burnout. Age, duty, weekly rest time, night shift frequency, and income all influenced job burnout. Logistic regression analysis identified a lack of weekly rest time (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.03–6.57) and working two or three night shifts per week (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.22–3.85) as influential factors for job burnout (Table 3).

Table 3.

Single factor analysis of job burnout

Factor Category > 27 points ≤ 27 points P-value
Sex Female 176 (55.2) 134 (55.1) 1
Male 143 (44.8) 109 (44.9)
Age 31 ~ 40 years 181 (56.7) 118 (48.6) 0.026
> 40 years 83 (26.0) 89 (36.6)
≤ 30 years 55 (17.2) 36 (14.8)
Marital status Unmarried 49 (15.4) 33 (13.6) 0.637
Married 270 (84.6) 210 (86.4)
Raising children Yes 242 (75.9) 193 (79.4) 0.369
No 77 (24.1) 50 (20.6)
Education Bachelor’s degree or below 113 (35.4) 75 (30.9) 0.488
Masters 177 (55.5) 142 (58.4)
Doctorate 29 (9.1) 26 (10.7)
Professional title Resident/attending physician 72 (22.6) 38 (15.6) 0.052
Associate chief physician/chief physician 247 (77.4) 205 (84.4)
Duty Director/deputy director 53 (16.6) 55 (22.6) 0.04
Medical team leader 53 (16.6) 51 (21.0)
None 213 (66.8) 137 (56.4)
Years of work < 5 65 (20.4) 44 (18.1) 0.127
5–10 83 (26.0) 51 (21.0)
11–15 95 (29.8) 69 (28.4)
> 15 76 (23.8) 79 (32.5)
Department Internal medicine 228 (71.5) 163 (67.1) 0.496
Surgery 47 (14.7) 39 (16.0)
Other 44 (13.8) 41 (16.9)
Weekly rest time 2 days 99 (31.0) 120 (49.4) < 0.001
1 day 129 (40.4) 101 (41.6)
None 91 (28.5) 22 (9.1)
Night shift frequency Once a month or less 59 (18.5) 79 (32.5) < 0.001
2–3 times/month 19 (6.0) 27 (11.1)
Once a week 143 (44.8) 103 (42.4)
2–3 times/week 98 (30.7) 34 (14.0)
Income(CNY) < 5000 29 (9.1) 13 (5.3) 0.041
5000–10,000 160 (50.2) 106 (43.6)
10,000–15,000 99 (31.0) 87 (35.8)
> 15,000 31 (9.7) 37 (15.2)

Data are expressed as number (percentage)

Secondary traumatic stress

The mean secondary traumatic stress score was 26.2 ± 6.04; Of the 562 physicians surveyed, 507 (90.2%) clinicians had traumatic stress disorder. Age, raising children, professional title, duty, years of work, weekly rest time, and income were all associated with stress trauma. Married physicians (OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.00–7.28) were more likely to experience secondary traumatic stress (Table 4).

Table 4.

Single factor analysis of secondary stress trauma

Factor Category > 17 points ≤ 17 points P-value
Sex Female 270 (53.3) 40 (72.7) 0.009
Male 237 (46.7) 15 (27.3)
Age 31 ~ 40 years 265 (52.3) 34 (61.8) 0.005
> 40 years 165 (32.5) 7 (12.7)
≤ 30 years 77 (15.2) 14 (25.5)
Marital status Unmarried 71 (14.0) 11 (20.0) 0.32
Married 436 (86.0) 44 (80.0)
Raising children Yes 399 (78.7) 36 (65.5) 0.039
No 108 (21.3) 19 (34.5)
Education Bachelor’s degree or below 169 (33.3) 19 (34.5) 0.521
Masters 286 (56.4) 33 (60.0)
Doctorate 52 (10.3) 3 (5.5)
Professional title Resident/attending physician 90 (17.8) 20 (36.4) 0.002
Associate chief physician/chief physician 417 (82.2) 35 (63.6)
Duty Director/deputy director 105 (20.7) 3 (5.5) 0.002
Medical team leader 98 (19.3) 6 (10.9)
None 304 (60.0) 46 (83.6)
Years of work < 5 93 (18.3) 16 (29.1) 0.02
5–10 118 (23.3) 16 (29.1)
11–15 147 (29.0) 17 (30.9)
> 15 149 (29.4) 6 (10.9)
Department Internal medicine 353 (69.6) 38 (69.1) 0.45
Surgery 75 (14.8) 11 (20.0)
Other 79 (15.6) 6 (10.9)
Weekly rest time 2 days 202 (39.8) 17 (30.9) 0.046
1 day 210 (41.4) 20 (36.4)
None 95 (18.7) 18 (32.7)
Night shift frequency Once a month or less 134 (26.4) 4 (7.3) 0.001
2–3 times/month 43 (8.5) 3 (5.5)
Once a week 221 (43.6) 25 (45.5)
2–3 times/week 109 (21.5) 23 (41.8)
Income(CNY) < 5000 32 (6.3) 10 (18.2) 0.005
5000–10,000 238 (46.9) 28 (50.9)
10,000–15,000 172 (33.9) 14 (25.5)
> 15,000 65 (12.8) 3 (5.5)

Data are expressed as number (percentage)

Factors influencing the degree of empathy fatigue

Mild, moderate, and severe empathy fatigue was experienced by 118, 132, and 291 physicians, respectively. Sex, age, raising children, education, professional title, duty, years of work, department, weekly rest time, night shift frequency, and income all influenced the degree of empathy fatigue. Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that working two or three night shifts per week was associated with severe compassion fatigue (OR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.47–6.50) (Table 5).

Table 5.

Univariate analysis of factors influencing the degree of empathy fatigue

Factor Category Normal (n = 21) Mild (n = 118) Moderate
(n = 132)
Severe (n = 291) P-value
Sex Female 11 (52.4%) 57 (48.3%) 78 (59.1%) 164 (56.4%) 0.008
Male 10 (47.6%) 61 (51.7%) 54 (40.9%) 127 (43.6%)
Age (years) mean ± SD 38.8 ± 6.54 39.3 ± 7.42 37.0 ± 6.16 36.4 ± 5.74 < 0.001
Marital status Unmarried 2 (9.5%) 17 (14.4%) 18 (13.6%) 45 (15.5%) 0.008
Married 19 (90.5%) 101 (85.6%) 114 (86.4%) 246 (84.5%)
Raising children Yes 19 (90.5%) 91 (77.1%) 105 (79.5%) 220 (75.6%) 0.014
No 2 (9.5%) 27 (22.9%) 27 (20.5%) 71 (24.4%)
Education Bachelor’s degree or below 8 (38.1%) 33 (28.0%) 49 (37.1%) 98 (33.7%) < 0.001
Masters 10 (47.6%) 74 (62.7%) 66 (50.0%) 169 (58.1%)
Doctorate 3 (14.3%) 11 (9.3%) 17 (12.9%) 24 (8.2%)
Professional title Resident/attending physician 3 (14.3%) 15 (12.7%) 25 (18.9%) 67 (23.0%) 0.008
Associate chief physician/chief physician 18 (85.7%) 103 (87.3%) 107 (81.1%) 224 (77.0%)
Duty Director/deputy director 4 (19.0%) 32 (27.1%) 30 (22.7%) 42 (14.4%) 0.003
Medical team leader 4 (19.0%) 27 (22.9%) 23 (17.4%) 50 (17.2%)
None 13 (61.9%) 59 (50.0%) 79 (59.8%) 199 (68.4%)
Years of work < 5 3 (14.3%) 19 (16.1%) 25 (18.9%) 62 (21.3%) < 0.001
5–10 4 (19.0%) 24 (20.3%) 31 (23.5%) 75 (25.8%)
11–15 6 (28.6%) 30 (25.4%) 38 (28.8%) 90 (30.9%)
> 15 8 (38.1%) 45 (38.1%) 38 (28.8%) 64 (22.0%)
Department Internal medicine 13 (61.9%) 80 (67.8%) 93 (70.5%) 205 (70.4%) < 0.001
Surgery 5 (23.8%) 14 (11.9%) 22 (16.7%) 45 (15.5%)
Other 3 (14.3%) 24 (20.3%) 17 (12.9%) 41 (14.1%)
Weekly rest time 2 days 13 (61.9%) 53 (44.9%) 62 (47.0%) 91 (31.3%) 0.004
1 day 8 (38.1%) 49 (41.5%) 52 (39.4%) 121 (41.6%)
None 0 (0%) 16 (13.6%) 18 (13.6%) 79 (27.1%)
Night shift frequency Once a month or less 11 (52.4%) 39 (33.1%) 37 (28.0%) 51 (17.5%) < 0.001
2–3 times/month 1 (4.8%) 17 (14.4%) 11 (8.3%) 17 (5.8%)
Once a week 6 (28.6%) 47 (39.8%) 64 (48.5%) 129 (44.3%)
2–3 times/week 3 (14.3%) 15 (12.7%) 20 (15.2%) 94 (32.3%)
Income(CNY) 5000–10,000 7 (33.3%) 48 (40.7%) 60 (45.5%) 151 (51.9%) 0.001
10,000–15,000 8 (38.1%) 42 (35.6%) 45 (34.1%) 91 (31.3%)
> 15,000 6 (28.6%) 21 (17.8%) 18 (13.6%) 23 (7.9%)
< 5000 0 (0%) 7 (5.9%) 9 (6.8%) 26 (8.9%)

Data are expressed as number (percentage) unless otherwise stated. SD, standard deviation

Thoughts of resigning are related to empathy fatigue

Of the physicians who participated in the survey, 254 (45.2%) sometimes and 170 (30.2%) often/always had thoughts of resigning. Sex, age, professional title, duty, years of work, weekly rest time, and night shift frequency all influenced thoughts of resigning. Multiple regression analysis suggested that weekly rest time (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.32–6.43), empathic satisfaction disorder (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.12–0.54), job burnout (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09–0.36), and secondary traumatic stress disorder (OR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01–0.36) influence thoughts of resigning (Table 6).

Table 6.

Univariate analysis of factors influencing thoughts of resigning

Factor Category Never/rarely (n = 138) Sometimes (n = 254) Often/always (n = 170) P-value
Sex Female 60 (43.5) 129 (50.8) 121 (71.2) < 0.001
Male 78 (56.5) 125 (49.2) 49 (28.8)
Age (years) mean (SD) 39.28 (6.88) 37.33 (6.10) 35.50 (5.75) < 0.001
Marital status Unmarried 16 (11.6) 36 (14.2) 30 (17.6) 0.316
Married 122 (88.4) 218 (85.8) 140 (82.4)
Raising children Yes 115 (83.3) 197 (77.6) 123 (72.4) 0.072
No 23 (16.7) 57 (22.4) 47 (27.6)
Education Bachelor’s degree or below 43 (31.2) 92 (36.2) 53 (31.2) 0.645
Masters 82 (59.4) 135 (53.1) 102 (60.0)
Doctorate 13 (9.4) 27 (10.6) 15 (8.8)
Professional title Resident/attending physician 21 (15.2) 42 (16.5) 47 (27.6) 0.006
Associate chief physician/chief physician 117 (84.8) 212 (83.5) 123 (72.4)
Duty Director/deputy director 39 (28.3) 50 (19.7) 19 (11.2) < 0.001
Medical team leader 28 (20.3) 52 (20.5) 24 (14.1)
None 71 (51.4) 152 (59.8) 127 (74.7)
Years of work < 5 17 (12.3) 49 (19.3) 43 (25.3) 0.009
5–10 31 (22.5) 59 (23.2) 44 (25.9)
11–15 39 (28.3) 73 (28.7) 52 (30.6)
> 15 51 (37.0) 73 (28.7) 31 (18.2)
Department Internal medicine 96 (69.6) 170 (66.9) 125 (73.5) 0.192
Surgery 16 (11.6) 43 (16.9) 27 (15.9)
Other 26 (18.8) 41 (16.1) 18 (10.6)
Weekly rest time 2 days 67 (48.6) 102 (40.2) 50 (29.4) 0.001
1 day 51 (37.0) 109 (42.9) 70 (41.2)
None 20 (14.5) 43 (16.9) 50 (29.4)
Night shift frequency Once a month or less 50 (36.2) 65 (25.6) 23 (13.5) < 0.001
2–3 times/month 14 (10.1) 24 (9.4) 8 (4.7)
Once a week 50 (36.2) 119 (46.9) 77 (45.3)
2–3 times/week 24 (17.4) 46 (18.1) 62 (36.5)
Income(CNY) < 5000 10 (7.2) 13 (5.1) 19 (11.2) < 0.001
5000–10,000 47 (34.1) 124 (48.8) 95 (55.9)
10,000–15,000 56 (40.6) 85 (33.5) 45 (26.5)
> 15,000 25 (18.1) 32 (12.6) 11 (6.5)
Empathic satisfaction disorder Yes 65 (47.1) 196 (77.2) 156 (91.8) < 0.001
No 73 (52.9) 58 (22.8) 14 (8.2)
Job burnout Yes 44 (31.9) 131 (51.6) 144 (84.7) < 0.001
No 94 (68.1) 123 (48.4) 26 (15.3)
Secondary traumatic stress Yes 112 (81.2) 238 (93.7) 169 (99.4) < 0.001
No 26 (18.8) 16 (6.3) 1 (0.6)

Data are expressed as number (percentage) unless otherwise stated. SD, standard deviation

Discussion

Our study identified 291 physicians with severe empathy fatigue; 75.4% of the participating physicians had thought about resigning. Working weekends and two or three night shifts per week were factors associated with empathy fatigue; working two or three night shifts per week was also associated with severe empathy fatigue. In turn, empathy fatigue was associated with thoughts of resigning.

Few studies have been performed on empathy fatigue in physicians. Research in oncologists suggested that a quarter experience high levels of compassion satisfaction, with a quarter at risk of compassion fatigue [17]. A separate study found that oncologists reported high levels of secondary traumatic stress and compassion satisfaction [18]. Secondary traumatic stress scores were 17.18 (SD = 7.02, range = 3–39). Similarly, job burnout levels were high, with an average score of 26.74 (SD = 6.76, range = 4–41). In a study of 914 junior doctors conducted by Markwell et al., 54% experienced empathy fatigue [19]. Our study found a higher proportion of doctors with empathy fatigue than that reported in previous studies, which may be related to the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, doctors experienced sustained high-intensity work pressure and mental stress, which have not improved since the end of the pandemic [20]. This may also be related to the high workload of physicians in China, who, according to a 2017 white paper, work more than 50 h per week on average, far exceeding the legal full-time work week of 40 h. These long working hours are compounded by an inability to take vacation time, with only 24% of physicians taking their full allotment of annual leave, 48% taking less, and 23.6% forgoing vacation altogether [21]. Approximately 40% of physicians sleep less than six hours per day [22]. Our study found that 51.8% of physicians had severe empathy fatigue, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies. A survey of 174 psychiatric nurses in 12 public hospitals in Greece revealed that 44.8% were at a high risk of empathy fatigue [23]. Cho et al. found that 72% of 171 oncology nurses had moderate-to-high levels of empathy fatigue [24]. We found the phenomenon of empathy fatigue among physicians is relatively serious. Studies have shown that serious empathy fatigue among medical staff affects the quality and safety of medical services, not only affecting the quality of diagnosis and treatment of patients but also the physical and mental health of medical staff [4, 5, 25, 26]. We call on the global society to acknowledge and address empathy fatigue in doctors to avoid more serious consequences.

Studies have shown that empathy fatigue is influenced by factors including sex, age, marital status, years of work, shift pattern, and leave [2729]. Jasperse et al. showed that job-related factors such as years of work, work department, shift pattern, and workload, as well as hospital characteristics, were significantly correlated with empathy fatigue and job burnout [30]. Oktay et al. pointed out that almost all nurses experience a low-to-moderate degree of empathy fatigue, which was affected by factors including age, years of work, marital status, and hospital type [31]. Our finding that working weekends and two or three night shifts per week was significantly associated with empathy fatigue is consistent with the results of a previous study, which showed that working more than 60 h and two or more night shifts per week was associated with anxiety or depressive symptoms [32]. When doctors work long hours and night shifts, their sense of accomplishment and emotional engagement are affected. It is therefore necessary to ensure that doctors have sufficient rest time to increase their energy and enthusiasm for their work [33].

We found that the majority of physicians had thought of resigning, which is consistent with a previous survey of 1414 residents that classified nearly half (47.87%) into ‘high’ and ‘very high’ turnover intention level; 11.46% ‘often’ thought about quitting [34]. Our findings are also similar to the reported proportion of rural health workers from 11 western provinces in China (29.1%) [35] and one teaching hospital in central China (37.8%) [36] who have thought about resigning. Internationally, the percentage was also similar to that among general surgery residents in Canada (32.0%) [37] and also higher than that reported in the USA (20.0%) [38] and general internal medicine residents in Switzerland (21.0%) [39]. Similarly, consistent with previous studies, our study found that job burnout can significantly affect thoughts of resigning. Longer years of work and longer weekly working hours were associated with greater job burnout, a diminished sense of belonging, and increased thoughts of resigning [3032, 4042].

Our study found that a large proportion of physicians have empathy fatigue, with some having severe empathy fatigue. Empathy fatigue among physicians was associated with thoughts of resigning. This study provides evidence for hospital administrators showing the importance of addressing empathy fatigue in physicians and not only in nurses in specific departments, as addressed in prior studies. It is hoped that hospital managers undertake corresponding measures to improve empathy fatigue in physicians to prevent the continued loss of medical staff. Our study also had some limitations. Our analyses primarily focus on correlations rather than causal inference, hence our findings may be susceptible to confounding bias. The sample size of the present survey was not small, further describing the current situation of empathy fatigue among physicians in China. However, because we used convenience and snowball sampling, there is a lack of generalizability in the present study. In the future, there needs to be a larger sample size for Empathy fatigue among physicians in China.

Conclusions

This survey of hospital physicians in Southwest China shows that the majority are experiencing severe empathy fatigue and have considered resigning, thus providing reference data that demonstrate the extent of this issue. Efforts are needed to address empathy fatigue in physicians and therefore increase physician retention. This may involve ensuring enough rest time and altering shift patterns, both factors identified here as being associated with empathy fatigue. We call on global societies and governments to address empathy fatigue among physicians. We hope that health authorities can take effective measures to intervene, considering the most effective intervention measures without increasing the burden on physicians.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (50.8KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

We thank all the clincians for their cooperation.

Abbreviations

CI

Confidence interval

OR

Odds ratio

Author contributions

Qing Ye, Xuemin Zhong and Gongbo Li were responsible for the study conception and design. Qingye, Xuemin Zhong and Qiang Zhou were responsible for the data collection and the first draft of the paper.Qingye, Xuemin Zhong and Hua Liu were responsible for the final manuscript and data analysis. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript for publication.

Funding

None.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Medical and Health Research Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants, and confidentiality was guaranteed. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Hua Liu, Email: hxliumedidoctor@163.com.

Gongbo Li, Email: ligongbo@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn.

References

  • 1.Barnett MD, Hays KN, Cantu C. <ArticleTitle Language=“En”>Compassion fatigue, emotional labor, and emotional display among hospice nurses. Death Stud. 2022;46:290–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Figley CR. Compassion fatigue: psychotherapists’ chronic lack of self care. J Clin Psychol. 2002;58:1433–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cavanagh N, Cockett G, Heinrich C, Doig L, Fiest K, Guichon JR, et al. Compassion fatigue in healthcare providers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurs Ethics. 2020;27:639–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hegney DG, Craigie M, Hemsworth D, Osseiran-Moisson R, Aoun S, Francis K, et al. Compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue, anxiety, depression and stress in registered nurses in Australia: study 1 results. J Nurs Manag. 2014;22:506–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kelly L, Runge J, Spencer C. Predictors of compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction in acute care nurses. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015;47:522–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang J, Wang X, Chen O, Li J, Li Y, Chen Y, et al. Social support, empathy and compassion fatigue among clinical nurses: structural equation modeling. BMC Nurs. 2023;22:425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yu H, Jiang A, Shen J. Prevalence and predictors of compassion fatigue, burnout and compassion satisfaction among oncology nurses: A cross-sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;57:28–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hu Z, Wang H, Xie J, Zhang J, Li H, Liu S, et al. Burnout in ICU doctors and nurses in mainland China-A national cross-sectional study. J Crit Care. 2021;62:265–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Morawa E, Adler W, Schug C, Geiser F, Beschoner P, Jerg-Bretzke L, et al. Depressive and anxiety symptoms in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic among physicians in hospitals: results of the longitudinal, multicenter VOICE-EgePan survey over two years. BMC Psychol. 2023;11:327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wetzel L, Halfmann M, Castioni N, Kiefer F, König S, Schmieder A, et al. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental burden and quality of life in physicians: results of an online survey. Front Psychiatry. 2023;14:1068715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ofei-Dodoo S, Loo-Gross C, Kellerman R. Burnout, depression, anxiety, and stress among family physicians in Kansas responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Board Fam Med. 2021;34:522–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Alkhamees AA, Aljohani MS, Kalani S, Ali AM, Almatham F, Alwabili A, et al. Physician’s burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20:4598. 10.3390/ijerph20054598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhu P, Qian M, Lee A, Hayter M, Wang W, Shi G, et al. Trajectory analysis of the work and life experience of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal qualitative study. BMC Nurs. 2023;22:333. 10.1186/s12912-023-01520-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Martin B, Kaminski-Ozturk N, O’Hara C, Smiley R. Examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on burnout and stress among U.S. nurses. J Nurs Regul. 2023;14:4–12. 10.1016/S2155-8256(23)00063-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stamm BH. The Concise ProQOL Manual; 2010. http://www.ProQOL.org
  • 16.Chen HY, Wang WH. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Compassion Fatigue Scale. Chin Nurs Manag. 2013;13:39–41. [in Chinese]. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hunt P, Denieffe S, Gooney M. Running on empathy: relationship of empathy to compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue in cancer healthcare professionals. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019;28:e13124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Granek L, Nakash O, Cohen M, Ben-David M, Ariad S. Oncologists’ communication about end of life: the relationship among secondary traumatic stress, compassion satisfaction, and approach and avoidance communication. Psychooncology. 2017;26:1980–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Markwell AL, Wainer Z. The health and wellbeing of junior doctors: insights from a national survey. Med J Aust. 2009;191:441–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hui L, Garnett A, Oleynikov C, Boamah SA. Compassion fatigue in healthcare providers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2023;13:e069843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gao L, Xiao X, Che G, Zhang L. Sudden death of physicians in China: A red alert. Popul Health Manag. 2019;22:191–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yang C, Chen ZL, Chen LY, Jiang JX. Burnout in healthcare: a sign of death by overwork for doctors in China. BMJ. 2019;366:l5582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mangoulia P, Koukia E, Alevizopoulos G, Fildissis G, Katostaras T. Prevalence of secondary traumatic stress among psychiatric nurses in Greece. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2015;29:333–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cho HJ, Jung MS. Effect of empathy, resilience, self-care on compassion fatigue in oncology nurses. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2014;20:373–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Xie W, Chen L, Feng F, Okoli CTC, Tang P, Zeng L, et al. The prevalence of compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue among nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;120:103973. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cetrano G, Tedeschi F, Rabbi L, Gosetti G, Lora A, Lamonaca D, et al. How are compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction affected by quality of working life? Findings from a survey of mental health staff in Italy. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:755. 10.1186/s12913-017-2726-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Min Z. Research on empathy fatigue of professional helpers [D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology; 2014. [in Chinese]. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li J, Hu Y, Wu X, Zhu X, Qi Z, Zhang Z. Visual analysis of compassion fatigue of medical staff based on CiteSpace. Chin Hosp. 2022;26:41–4. [in Chinese]. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hunsaker S, Chen HC, Maughan D, Heaston S. Factors that influence the development of compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction in emergency department nurses. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015;47:186–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jasperse M, Herst P, Dungey G. Evaluating stress, burnout and job satisfaction in New Zealand radiation oncology departments. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2014;23:82–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Oktay D, Ozturk C. Compassion fatigue in nurses and influencing factors. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2022;58:1691–700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gong Y, Han T, Chen W, Dib HH, Yang G, Zhuang R, et al. Prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms and related risk factors among physicians in China: a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e103242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Medical Doctors Association. White Paper on medical practitioners in China. z]. 2015;5:27. [in Chinese].
  • 34.Sun X, Zhang M, Lu Z, Zhang Z, Zheng JC, Cheng L, et al. Turnover intention and related factors among resident physicians in China under the standardised residency training programme: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e061922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Liu J, Zhu B, Wu J, Mao Y. Job satisfaction, work stress, and turnover intentions among rural health workers: a cross-sectional study in 11 Western provinces of China. BMC Fam Pract. 2019;20:9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Geng H, Tan F, Deng Y, Lai L, Zhang J, Wu Z, et al. High rate of burnout among residents under standardized residency training in a tertiary teaching hospital of middle China: results from a cross-sectional survey. Medicine. 2020;99:e20901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ginther DN, Dattani S, Miller S, Hayes P. Thoughts of quitting general surgery residency: factors in Canada. J Surg Educ. 2016;73:513–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dolan PT, Symer MM, Mao JI, Sosa JA, Yeo HL. National prospective cohort study describing how financial stresses are associated with attrition from surgical residency. Am J Surg. 2020;220:519–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zumbrunn B, Stalder O, Limacher A, Ballmer PE, Bassetti S, Battegay E, et al. The well-being of Swiss general internal medicine residents. Swiss Med Wkly. 2020;150:w20255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chen X, Ran L, Zhang Y, Yang J, Yao H, Zhu S, et al. Moderating role of job satisfaction on turnover intention and burnout among workers in primary care institutions: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hamidi MS, Bohman B, Sandborg C, Smith-Coggins R, de Vries P, Albert MS, et al. Estimating institutional physician turnover attributable to self-reported burnout and associated financial burden: a case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lo D, Wu F, Chan M, Chu R, Li D. A systematic review of burnout among doctors in China: a cultural perspective. Asia Pac Fam Med. 2018;17:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sinsky CA, Dyrbye LN, West CP, Satele D, Tutty M, Shanafelt TD. Professional satisfaction and the career plans of US physicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92:1625–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (50.8KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES