Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 25;13(21):6398. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216398

Table 3.

Summary of Finerenone in head-to-head randomized controlled trials.

Study (Year) Design Population Intervention vs. Control Primary Outcome Effect Size
Zhang et al. (2022) [36] Network meta-analysis - Finerenone vs. SGLT2i and GLP-1 agonist Cardiorenal outcomes SGLT2i significantly decreased the risk of renal events and HHF in comparison. All three were comparable in MACE, ACD, and CVD.
ARTS part A and B (2013) [26] RCT HFrEF and CKD Finerenone 2.5–10 mg once daily vs. placebo (part A) and spironolactone (part B) Change in potassium Finerenone 10 mg once daily and 5 mg twice daily led to higher mean increases in serum potassium than the placebo but lower levels than spironolactone
ARTS-HF (2016) [27] RCT HFrEF and T2D and/or CKD Finerenone 2.5–15 mg once daily vs. eplerenone 25–50 mg once daily >30% decline in NT-proBNP There was no difference in the NT-proBNP decline in Finerenone versus eplerenone

RCT = randomized controlled trial; HFrEF = heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; CKD = chronic kidney disease; T2D = type 2 diabetes; SGLT2i = sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor; GLP-1 agonist = glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; NT-proBNP = N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide; HHF = hospitalization for heart failure; MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events; ACD = all-cause death; CVD = cardiovascular death.