Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 21;103(11):707–722. doi: 10.1159/000540102

Table 3.

Recommended dose report metrics for fluoroscopy (2D) and CBCT/tomosynthesis image acquisition (3D) in interventional pulmonology studies

Metric Reporting unit Relevant for modality
General information
 BMI kg/m2 FL + CBCT + tomosynthesis
Fluoroscopy
 Time min:s FL + CBCT + tomosynthesis1
 DAP Gy∙cm2 FL + CBCT + tomosynthesis1
 CAK mGy FL + CBCT + tomosynthesis1
CBCT/tomosynthesis
 Number of scans # CBCT + tomosynthesis1
 Average scan DAP Gy∙cm2 CBCT + tomosynthesis1
 Total scan DAP Gy∙cm2 CBCT + tomosynthesis1
 Total scan CAK mGy CBCT + tomosynthesis1
Procedure
 Procedural total time (scope in – scope out) min:s FL + CBCT + tomosynthesis
 DAP Gy∙cm2 FL + CBCT + tomosynthesis
 CAK mGy FL + CBCT + tomosynthesis

It is recommended to make a distinction in reporting between fluoroscopy and CBCT/tomosynthesis imaging. However, not all systems will have a 2D and 3D distinction for DAP and CAK, only a total cumulative report per procedure. It is recommended to use the mean or median along with standard deviation or 95% confidence interval based on the distribution of data (non-normal vs. normal).

BMI, body mass index; CAK, cumulative air kerma; CBCT, cone-beam CT; CT, computed tomography; DAP, dose area product; FL, fluoroscopy.

1If available: tomosynthesis fluoroscopy dose for fluoroscopy or 3D imaging separately.