Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 1;248:263–291. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.248.131839

Table 1.

Morphological comparison of Paracatenula and Wallaceago with the most similar genera.

Paracatenula Wallaceago Catenulopsis Catenula Amphora Lunella Parlibellus
This study This study Kryk et al. (2021) Mereschkowsky (1902) Kützing (1844) Snoeijs (1996) Cox (1988)
Valves strongly asymmetric and dorsiventral strongly asymmetric, dorsiventral, semi–rhombic strongly asymmetric and dorsiventral strongly asymmetric and dorsiventral asymmetric and dorsiventral semi-lanceolate and dorsiventral symmetric, bluntly lanceolate
Raphe position eccentric, near ventral mantle eccentric, near ventral mantle eccentric, near ventral mantle eccentric, near ventral mantle moderate to strong eccentric toward ventral mantle or valve margin, raphe ledge present near the ventral margin on valve face, in the centre
Raphe shape biarcuate straight biarcuate slightly biarcuate or sinusoidal biarcuate straight to biarcuate (sigmoid) slightly biarcuate straight
Raphe distal Endings bent to dorsal, distant to poles curved to ventral, distant to poles curved to ventral, distant to poles bent to dorsal, distant to poles curved to dorsal face terminating to ventral terminating to secondary side
Raphe proximal Endings straight, distant close and curved to ventral close and curved to ventral straight, distant terminate on ventral; on valve face; close to distant straight to deflected on ventral; close straight and distant
Sternum narrow none narrow narrow narrow narrow narrow
Valve face/ mantle transition abrupt abrupt abrupt abrupt abrupt gradual both ventral and dorsal gradual
Helictoglossae well developed poorly developed poorly developed well developed poor to well-developed well developed well developed
Cingulum open, perforated small pore unknown several plain porous copulae open, non–porous band plain or perforated, one or more areolae porous copulae wide girdle region, perforated