Skip to main content
. 2024 May 25;6(5):100955. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100955

Table 4.

Outcome Scores Considering Severity and Shape of Tear

Patients With Full-Thickness Tears (n = 26)
Patte Classification
Tear Shape
Patte Stage 3 (n = 7) No Retraction or Patte Stage 1 or 2 (n = 19) P Value U-Shaped (n = 14) All Other Shapes (n = 12) P Value
ASES shoulder score
 Preoperative 21.90 ± 22.16 30.96 ± 17.01 .132 26.07 ± 21.06 31.38 ± 15.47 .226
 Postoperative 87.13 ± 10.16 95.08 ± 7.05 .033 90.1 ± 9.08 95.83 ± 7.26 .047
 P value .018 .001 .001 .002
UCLA shoulder score
 Preoperative 8.71 ± 6.37 14.26 ± 5.13 .059 12.14 ± 6.60 13.50 ± 5.66 .624
 Postoperative 30.14 ± 3.48 33.37 ± 1.97 .020 31.57 ± 2.98 33.58 ± 2.23 .050
 P value .020 .001 .001 .001
VAS score
 Preoperative 7.71 ± 2.49 7.16 ± 1.74 .463 7.36 ± 2.30 7.25 ± 1.48 .638
 Postoperative 1.0 ± 1.41 0.58 ± 0.96 .473 0.86 ± 1.23 0.50 ± 0.90 .362
 P value .018 .001 .001 .001

NOTE. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. All patients with full-thickness tears showed significant improvements in clinical scores from preoperatively to postoperatively. Patients with either Patte stage 3 retraction or U-shaped tears had significantly lower clinical outcome scores than patients with less severe retraction or non–U-shaped tears.

ASES, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles; VAS, visual analog scale.

Statistically significant (P < .05).