Table 5.
Diagnostic accuracy of periapical radiography (PR) and panoramic radiography (PAN), for anatomical areas
| Author and year of publication | Incisors | Canines | Premolars | Molars |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estrela et al., 2008 [50] |
67.0% for PR 42.0% for PAN |
75.0% for PR 61.0% for PAN |
74.0% for PR 59.0% for PAN |
67.0% for PR 51.0% for PAN |
| Estrela et al., 2009 [43] | – | – | – | – |
| Moura et al., 2009 [44] | 67.3% for PR * | 67.3% for PR * | 80.3% for PR * | 75.2% for PR * |
| Weissman et al., 2015[45] | – | – | – | – |
| Kanagasingam et al., 2017 [39] | – | – | – | – |
| Kanagasingam et al., 2017 [40] | – | – | – | – |
| Nardi et al., 2017 [47] |
55.0% upper arch for PAN 50.0% lower arch for PAN |
67.5% upper arch for PAN 80.0% lower arch for PAN |
67.5% upper arch for PAN 80.0% lower arch for PAN |
57.5% upper arch for PAN 80.0% lower arch for PAN |
| Nardi et al., 2018 [48] |
62.5% upper arch for PAN 60.0% lower arch for PAN |
71.3% upper arch for PAN 85.0% lower arch for PAN |
71.3% upper arch for PAN 85.0% lower arch for PAN |
63.8% upper arch for PAN 85.0% lower arch for PAN |
| Nardi et al., 2020 [49] |
61.3% upper arch for PAN* 70.0% lower arch for PAN * |
71.3% upper arch for PAN * 85.0% lower arch for PAN * |
71.3% upper arch for PAN * 85.0% lower arch for PAN |
57.5% upper arch for PAN * 81.3% lower arch for PAN * |
| Jang et al., 2020 [46] | – | – | – | – |
| Bosoni et al., 2021 [42] | – | – | – | – |
| Li et al., 2022 [41] | – | – | – | – |
*Calculated by the current researchers based on the data collected from the included studies