Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 5;31(12):e16417. doi: 10.1111/ene.16417

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Research overview. This figure provides an overview of the systematic review and expert opinion. The recommendations are listed in the first column. In the second column, the frequency with which each recommendation was mentioned in the included papers is displayed. The following columns indicate whether there was expert consensus (green) or not (blank) for the three domains of applicability. Within each clinical topic category, the recommendations are ranked based on the following priority criteria, from highest to lowest: the recommendations with consensus in the three domains of applicability; the recommendations with consensus for actionability and feasibility; the recommendations with consensus for actionability and validity; the recommendations with consensus for actionability alone, with the highest consensus percentage first; the recommendations with consensus for feasibility alone and the recommendations with consensus for validity alone; recommendations for which no consensus was reached. If the criteria described above were the same for multiple recommendations, their ranking was further refined by the frequency of their mention in the papers included in the systematic review.