Table 4.

(i) Personalized electrical, mechanical and Windkessel parameters. (ii) Calibration and validation errors and errors $e_I$ and $e_{\mathit{II}}$ used to assess the validity of our cross-validation (except for P11 because of missing data of right pacing)

	P2	P3	P4	P6	P8	P11
Electrical
${\widehat{\sigma }}_f[{10}^{-4}·\square {\text{ms}}^{-1}]$	2.29	1.99	1.37	1.91	1.91	1.57	Conductivity along the fibres
							normalized wrt the surface-to-volume ratio
							and the transmembrane capacitance
${\widehat{\sigma }}_s[{10}^{-4}·\square {\text{ms}}^{-1}]$	1.05	0.91	0.62	0.87	0.87	0.72	Normalized conductivity—sheets direction
${\widehat{\sigma }}_n[{10}^{-4}·\square {\text{ms}}^{-1}]$	0.34	0.29	0.20	0.28	0.28	0.23	Normalized conductivity—normal direction
$c_0[{\text{s}}^{-\frac{1}{2}}]$	84.37	73.36	77.03	73.36	80.70	73.36	Velocity of the depolarization
							wave along the fibre direction
							for a planar wavefront
$\epsilon [-]$	11.96	14.95	14.20	19.46	14.95	14.95	Impact of the wavefront
							curvature on the propagation velocity
$z\in [0,1][-]$	1.0	1.0	1.0	0.7	0.7	0.9	Decreased electrical conductivity
							and active contractility in fibrotic regions
							($z=1$ denotes the healthy tissue);
							Tissue stiffening and reduced contractility
							by a stiffness rescaling of $[z+(1-z)4.56]$
Calibration error $[\%]$	4.0	6.1	7.3	5.9	9.9	4.6
Validation error $[\%]$	7.8	4.9	4.1	3.4	6.0	–
$e_I$ $[\%]$	14.4	18.8	15.8	44.1	6.5	–
$e_{\mathit{II}}$ $[\%]$	12.9	13.7	25.4	49.2	12.7	–
Mechanical
$a_{\text{XB}}[{10}^2·\text{M}]$	2.70	3.07	3.21	2.66	1.87	2.06	Myocardial tissue contractility
Windkessel
$R[{10}^7·\text{Pa}{\text{m}}^{-}3]$	3.40	3.00	3.92	2.8	5.60	3.50	Resistance of the two-element
							Windkessel model for the circulatory
							system during the ejection phase