Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 27;26(11):1209–1218. doi: 10.1111/jch.14884

TABLE 4.

Regression analysis for the association of diastolic blood pressure at different points during an exercise stress test according to diastolic function.

Beta (95% CI), p value
Group at 1 min exercise at 3 min exercise at peak exercise at 1 min recovery at 3 min recovery
Model 1 0 vs. 1 −0.8 (−3.0 to 1.4) p = .50 −0.8 (−3.6 to 2.0) p = .56 −0.5 (−4.5 to 3.5) p = .81 −3.2 (−6.2 to −0.3) p = .03 −2.9 (−5.7 to −0.2) p = .04
0 vs. 2 −3.4 (−7.0 to 0.1) p = .06 −0.003 (−4.5 to 4.5) p = .99 −0.7 (−7.1 to 5.6) p = .82 3.5 (−1.1 to −8.1) p = .135 −1.1 (−5.5 to 3.2) p = .04
1 vs. 2 −2.7 (−6.2 to 0.9) p = .14 0.8 (−3.7 to 5.3) p = .72 −0.3 (−6.7 to 6.2) p = .94 6.7 (2.0–11.4) p = .005 1.8 (−2.6 to 6.2) p = .42
Model 2 0 vs. 1 −0.8 (−3.2 to 1.7) p = .55 −2.4 (−5.5 to 0.7) p = .134 −1.4 (−5.8 to −3.1) p = .55 −4.0 (−7.3 to −0.7) p = .02 −2.9 (−6.0 to 0.2) p = .06
0 vs. 2 −2.8 (−6.6 to 0.9) p = .14 −0.8 (−5.5 to 3.9) p = 0.73 −2.2 (−9.0 to 4.6) p = .52 3.1 (−1.8 to 7.9) p = .21 −1.4 (−6.0 to 3.2) p = .56
1 vs. 2 −2.1 (−5.7 to −1.5) p = .26 1.6 (−3.0 to 6.1) p = .50 −0.9 (−7.4 to 5.7) p = .79 7.0 (2.3–11.7) p = .004 1.6 (2.9–6.0) p = .49
Model 3 0 vs. 1 0.5 (−3.3 to 4.3) p = .78 −5.3 (−10.2 to −0.5) p = .03 −3.6 (−10.7 to 3.4) p = .31 −4.9 (−10.0 to 0.2) p = .06 0.6 (−4.1 to 5.4) p = .79
0 vs. 2 −2.0 (−6.2 to 2.3) p = .36 −2.5 (−7.8 to 2.9) p = .36 −2.8 (−10.6 to 4.9) p = .47 1.9 (−3.4 to 7.2) p = .48 0.074 (−4.9 to 5.0) p = .98
1 vs. 2 −2.5 (−6.4 to 1.3) p = .20 2.9 (−1.9 to 7.7) p = .24 0.8 (6.1–7.7) p = .83 −6.8 (−11.8 to −1.8) p = .01 −0.6 (−5.2 to 4.1) p = .814
Model 4 0 vs. 1 0.5 (−3.4 to 4.4) p = .80 −4.7 (−9.6 to 0.3) p = .07 −3.6 (−10.9 to 3.7) p = .33 −3.9 (−9.1 to 1.2) p = .13 0.6 (−4.3 to 5.4) p = .81
0 vs. 2 −2.0 (−6.5 to 2.4) p = .37 −1.3 (−6.9 to 4.2) p = .64 −3.1 (−11.2 to 5.0) p = .45 3.4 (−2.1 to 8.8) p = .23 0.3 (−4.8 to 5.5) p = .91
1 vs. 2 −2.5 (−6.5 to 1.4) p = .20 3.3 (−1.6 to 8.2) p = .18 0.5 (−6.6 to 7.6) p = .88 7.3 (2.2–12.4) p = .01 −0.3 (−5.0 to 4.5) p = .91
Model 5 0 vs. 1 1.0 (−2.9 to 5.0) p = .60 −8.3 (−10.2 to 1.4) p = .95 −3.2 (−10.5 to 4.0) p = .38
0 vs. 2 −1.3 (−5.8 to 3.1) p = .55 −0.2 (−5.2 to 5.6) p = .95 −2.6 (−10.7 to 5.5) p = .53
1 vs. 2 −2.4 (−3.1 to 5.8) p = .55 3.6 (−1.1 to 8.4) p = .13 0.6 (−6.5 to 7.7) p = .86

ANCOVA for the association of diastolic blood pressure at different points during exercise testing in patients with and without diastolic dysfunction after correcting for different variables as described in models 1‐4. The different groups were compared with each other.

Group 0: Patients with normal diastolic function.

Group 1: Patients with diastolic dysfunction grade I.

Group 2: Patients with diastolic dysfunction grade II + III.

Model 1 is corrected for DBP at rest (continuous) during exercise and for peak BP (continuous) during recovery.

Model 2 includes all variables from Model 1 and is additionally corrected for sex (categorical) and age (continuous).

Model 3 includes all variables from Model 2 and is additionally corrected for BMI (continuous), CAD, HF, VHD, DM, OSAS (categorial).

Model 4 includes all variables from Model 3 and is additionally corrected for associated cardiac medication including, diuretics, betablockers, ACE‐Inhibitor or ARB, CCB (categorical).

Model 5 includes all variables from Model 4 and is additionally corrected for percentage of maximal workload (continuous).

Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin‐converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CAD, coronary artery disease; CCB, calcium channel blocker; DM, diabetes mellitus; HF, heart failure; OSAS, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; SBP, systolic blood pressure; VHD, valvular heart disease.