Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 11;24:1276. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10155-z

Table 4.

Dual lateral flow test (LFT) results by brand and days from baseline (study entry or first positive test) for individuals who tested positive

Day from baseline test-positivity
Dual LFT results 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Concordant

117

(90.0%)

129

(93.5%)

128

(94.8%)

113

(92.6%)

114

(91.9%)

104

(86.0%)

90

(81.8%)

83

(87.4%)

69

(82.1%)

47

(81.0%)

Both positive

114

(87.7%)

122

(88.4%)

123

(91.1%)

103

(84.4%)

94

(75.8%)

73

(60.3%)

52

(47.3%)

37

(38.9%)

20

(23.8%)

5

(8.6%)

Both negative

3

(2.3%)

7

(5.1%)

5

(3.7%)

10

(8.2%)

20

(16.1%)

31

(25.6%)

38

(34.5%)

46

(48.4%)

49

(58.3%)

42

(72.4%)

Discordant

13

(10.0%)

9

(6.5%)

7

(5.2%)

9

(7.4%)

10

(8.1%)

17

(14.0%)

20

(18.2%)

12

(12.6%)

15

(17.9%)

11

(19.0%)

Orient Gene positive

5

(3.8%)

3

(2.2%)

7

(5.2%)

6

(4.9%)

5

(4.0%)

12

(9.9%)

13

(11.8%)

8

(8.4%)

11

(13.1%)

8

(13.8%)

Innova positive

8

(6.2%)

6

(4.3%)

0

(0.0%)

3

(2.5%)

5

(4.0%)

5

(4.1%)

7

(6.4%)

4

(4.2%)

4

(4.8%)

3

(5.2%)

Total 130 138 135 122 124 121 110 95 84 58

Table includes only those participants who tested PCR or LFT positive at study entry or became LFT test-positive throughout the study and counts dual test results they reported on any day. Any LFT pair with any equivocal result was excluded, along with any dual tests prior to the first recorded positive test for each participant