Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Thromb Haemost. 2023 Jan 28;21(5):1135–1147. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.01.015

DNA methylation analysis identifies novel genetic loci associated with circulating fibrinogen levels in blood

Julie Hahn 1, Jan Bressler 1, Arce Domingo-Relloso 2,3,4, Ming-Huei Chen 5, Daniel L McCartney 6, Alexander Teumer 7,8,9, Jenny van Dongen 10,11, Marcus E Kleber 12,13, Dylan Aïssi 14, Brenton R Swenson 15, Jie Yao 16, Wei Zhao 17, Jian Huang 18, Yujing Xia 19, Michael R Brown 1, Ricardo Costeira 19, Eco JC de Geus 10,11, Graciela E Delgado 12, Dre’Von A Dobson 20, Paul Elliott 21,22,23, Hans J Grabe 24,25, Xiuqing Guo 16, Sarah E Harris 26, Jennifer E Huffman 27, Sharon LR Kardia 17, Yongmei Liu 28, Stefan Lorkowski 29,30, Riccardo E Marioni 6, Matthias Nauck 31,8, Scott M Ratliff 17, Maria Sabater-Lleal 32,33, Tim D Spector 19, Pierre Suchon 34, Kent D Taylor 16, Florian Thibord 35, David-Alexandre Trégouët 14, Kerri L Wiggins 36, Gonneke Willemsen 10,11, Jordana T Bell 19, Dorret I Boomsma 10,11, Shelley A Cole 37, Simon R Cox 26, Abbas Dehghan 18, Andreas Greinacher 38, Karin Haack 37, Winfried März 39,12,40, Pierre-Emmanuel Morange 41, Jerome I Rotter 16, Nona Sotoodehnia 42, Maria Tellez-Plaza 3, Ana Navas-Acien 2, Jennifer A Smith 17, Andrew D Johnson 5, Myriam Fornage 1,43, Nicholas L Smith 44,45,46, Alisa S Wolberg 20, Alanna C Morrison 1, Paul S de Vries 1
PMCID: PMC11556295  NIHMSID: NIHMS2023074  PMID: 36716967

Abstract

Background:

Fibrinogen plays an essential role in blood coagulation and inflammation. Circulating fibrinogen levels may be determined by inter-individual differences in DNA methylation at CpG sites, and vice versa.

Methods:

We performed an epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) of circulating fibrinogen levels in 18,037 White, Black, American Indian, and Hispanic participants representing 14 studies from the CHARGE consortium. Circulating leukocyte DNA methylation was measured in 12,904 participants using the Illumina 450K array, and in 5,133 participants using the EPIC array. Each study performed an EWAS of fibrinogen using linear mixed models adjusted for potential confounders. Study-specific results were combined using array-specific meta-analysis, followed by cross-replication of epigenome-wide significant associations. We compared models with and without C-reactive protein (CRP) adjustment to examine the role of inflammation.

Results:

We identified 208 and 87 significant CpG sites associated with fibrinogen from the 450K (p-value<1.03×10−7) and EPIC arrays (p-value<5.78×10−8), respectively. There were 78 associations from the 450K array that replicated in the EPIC array and 26 vice versa. After accounting for the overlapping sites, there were 83 replicated CpG sites located in 61 loci, of which only 4 have been previously reported for fibrinogen. Examples of genes located near these CpG sites were SOCS3 and AIM2, which are involved in inflammatory pathways. The associations for all 83 replicated CpG sites were attenuated after CRP adjustment, although many remained significant.

Conclusion:

We identified 83 CpG sites associated with circulating fibrinogen levels. These associations are partially driven by inflammatory pathways shared by both fibrinogen and CRP.

Keywords: DNA methylation, Fibrinogen, Epigenome-wide association study, Inflammation, Mendelian randomization

Introduction

Fibrinogen plays an essential role in blood coagulation and inflammation. (1, 2) These two processes contribute to the development of thrombotic and atherosclerotic diseases, such as coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke, and venous thromboembolism. (3–5) Previously, in the context of the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) consortium, a number of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were conducted to identify genetic loci involved in circulating fibrinogen levels, and to date, 42 loci associated with fibrinogen were identified. (6, 7) However, these loci account for only approximately 3% of the variability in fibrinogen levels. (6) Thus, an overall variance of fibrinogen levels is incompletely explained, and other factors likely also drive this variation, including epigenetic changes.

Epigenetic modifications are potentially heritable biochemical alterations to the genome that do not change the underlying genetic makeup, but they can alter the phenotypic expression. (8, 9) As one of the most stable epigenetic mechanisms, DNA methylation is one of the most well-studied epigenetic mechanisms that regulate gene expression. (8, 10) It is the mechanism whereby a methyl group is attached to the DNA sequence, usually to a cytosine nucleotide followed by a guanine nucleotide, also referred to as CpG sites. DNA methylation can be modified by both genetic and environmental factors, and, as such, investigating the variation in DNA methylation may further explain the phenotypic variation in fibrinogen levels.

Recently, epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) have successfully identified associations between numerous phenotypes and DNA methylation at cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) sites in circulating leukocytes. (8, 11, 12) Studying leukocyte DNA methylation levels from whole blood in relation to fibrinogen has several advantages compared to using other tissues: whole blood samples are readily available, fibrinogen is present in the circulation, and leukocytes within whole blood are intimately involved in inflammatory pathways that regulate fibrinogen production. An association between DNA methylation and fibrinogen levels may be caused by DNA methylation which has an impact on fibrinogen levels, or fibrinogen itself may directly or indirectly influence DNA methylation. Thus, analysis of these associations may provide insight into the regulation of fibrinogen as well as identify downstream effects of fibrinogen that may mediate its role in inflammation and thrombosis. The aim of this study was to examine the association between circulating leukocyte DNA methylation levels at CpG sites and circulating fibrinogen levels by performing the first EWAS for fibrinogen in 18,037 individuals within the setting of the CHARGE consortium.

Methods

Study population and design

This study was performed within the context of the CHARGE Hemostasis and Epigenetics Working Groups. A total of 18,037 participants from the following 14 studies were included: the Airwave Health Monitoring Study (Airwave), Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), the Framingham Heart Study (FHS), Genetic Epidemiology Network of Arteriopathy (GENOA), Lothian Birth Cohort 1921 (LBC 1921), Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (LBC 1936), the LUdwigshafen RIsk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) study, MARseille Thrombosis Association study (MARTHA), Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), Netherlands Twin Register (NTR), the Study of Health in Pomerania Independent cohort (SHIP-Trend), the Strong Heart Study (SHS) and the TwinsUK cohort (TwinsUK). Our study population was divided into two analysis groups determined by the array type used to measure DNA methylation. A total of 12,904 participants from eight studies were included in the Illumina 450K Human Methylation microarray (450K array) group which included individuals from White, Black and Hispanic population groups. The Illumina EPIC Human Methylation microarray (EPIC array) group consisted of a total of 5,133 participants from five studies which included individuals from White, Black, and American Indian population groups. Details for each study are provided in the Supplementary Methods. Participants using anticoagulation therapy at the time of phlebotomy were excluded from all analyses. All study participants provided written informed consent to participate, and all study sites received approval to conduct this research from their local Institutional Review Boards.

Fibrinogen measurements

Fibrinogen levels were measured from blood samples in g/L using the Clauss method. (13) Airwave, CHS, LBC, LURIC, MARTHA, NTR, SHIP-Trend, and SHS measured fibrinogen at the same time point as DNA methylation. Other studies measured fibrinogen prior to DNA methylation, including ARIC (White: mean [SD] time difference = 3.68 [1.35] years, Black: 3.3 (1.08) years), FHS (UMN: 13.58 [1.05] years, GEN3: 6.18 [0.59] years), and MESA (9.52 [0.51] years). GENOA measured fibrinogen after DNA methylation (2.3 [0.5] years). In the TwinsUK study the fibrinogen was measured prior to DNA methylation in some participants and after DNA methylation in others (0.11 [1.96] years). Fibrinogen levels were natural log-transformed to approximate the normal distribution, and outliers with fibrinogen values greater than 3 standard deviations from the study-specific log-transformed mean were removed. Study-specific methods are described in the Supplementary Methods.

DNA methylation quantification

DNA methylation levels for all studies were measured utilizing multiple cell types isolated from whole blood or buffy coat samples, except for MESA which extracted from CD14+ monocytes and CD4+ T cells. DNA methylation levels were analyzed using the Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip array (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) or Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array (Illumina). CpG probes included in more than one of the arrays are consistently named, facilitating the combination of data from different arrays. Greater than 90% of probes on the Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip array are also present on the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array, but the latter also includes an additional 330,000 probes targeting enhancer regions. (14) The degree of DNA methylation was expressed using β values, which ranged from 0–1. The β value of a specific CpG site was interpreted as the proportion of copies of the CpG site that are methylated. DNA methylation pre-processing and β value normalization were conducted independently in different studies using study-specific methods. Further study-specific DNA methylation methods are described in the Supplementary Methods.

Study-level association analyses

An EWAS of circulating fibrinogen levels was performed for each study. Ancestry-stratified linear regression models were used to evaluate the association of inter-individual variation in DNA methylation assessed as β values (outcome variable) and fibrinogen levels (independent variable). All models were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, body mass index (BMI), cell type proportions, technical covariates to control for batch effects, and ancestry informative principal components. Additionally, if blood samples used for measuring fibrinogen were obtained at a different time point than the blood samples used for measuring DNA methylation, the time difference between the fibrinogen and DNA methylation measurements was used as an additional covariate in the regression models. Study-specific analytic modeling details can be found in the Supplementary Methods.

Meta-analyses and cross-replication

Meta-analyses were performed separately for the 450K array and EPIC array, followed by cross-replication. Study-specific results were first meta-analyzed within ancestry groups, and the resulting ancestry-specific results were then meta-analyzed to produce array-specific results for the 450K and EPIC array. All meta-analyses were performed using fixed effect inverse-variance weighting as implemented in METAL. (15) In the 450K meta-analysis, a Bonferroni correction was applied to correct for multiple testing with a significance threshold of 1.03 × 10−7 (0.05 / 485,436 CpG sites). With the EPIC array meta-analysis, a Bonferroni corrected significance threshold of 5.78 × 10−8 (0.05 / 865,052 CpG sites) was used. Significant CpG sites that were present on both arrays were then cross-replicated: the results from the 450K array meta-analysis were replicated in the EPIC array meta-analysis results, and vice versa. Lastly, a meta-analysis of the 450K and EPIC array results was also performed for epigenome-wide significant and cross-replicated CpG sites in order to estimate their overall associations with fibrinogen levels.

Sensitivity analyses

In ARIC, a sensitivity analysis was performed adjusting additionally for C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of inflammation, to examine the role of inflammation. CRP was specifically chosen because it is phenotypically correlated with fibrinogen, an established marker of inflammation, a stable clinical readout as well as has a relatively stable half-life. (16) CRP was measured in mg/L using a high-sensitivity assay from the blood samples drawn at visit 2, which is the same visit at which DNA methylation was assessed. The analysis was restricted to individuals with CRP measurements, and CRP was incorporated into the model as natural log-transformed values. Initial analyses were performed for each population group (White and Black), and they were then meta-analyzed. We evaluated the changes in beta values of the significant and replicated CpG sites from the main analysis and considered genetic loci to be attenuated after CRP adjustment when the absolute values of betas were reduced by more than 10%.

Another sensitivity analysis was performed which evaluated the effect of differences in the timing of the fibrinogen and DNA methylation measures. We performed meta-analyses restricted to 1) studies that measured fibrinogen and DNA methylation at the same time, 2) studies that measured DNA methylation prior to fibrinogen measurement, and 3) studies that measured fibrinogen prior to DNA methylation. We then compared the associations of significant and replicated results from the main analysis across the three groups. The results from TwinsUK were excluded in this sensitivity analysis as they included samples using both directions in temporality.

Within the ARIC study, a sex-specific meta-analysis was performed to evaluate whether there is heterogeneity by sex in the significant and replicated CpG sites.

Bi-directional Mendelian randomization analysis

We performed bi-directional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to provide evidence for causal effects underlying the associations between fibrinogen and DNA methylation at significant and replicated CpG sites. By using a bidirectional approach, we explored whether genetically determined DNA methylation levels alter fibrinogen levels or whether genetically determined fibrinogen levels influence DNA methylation levels. For both directions of MR, the primary analyses combined evidence from multiple genetic instruments using fixed-effect inverse variance-weighted meta-analysis, as implemented in the R package TwoSampleMR. (17) When there was only one genetic instrument available, the Wald ratio test was instead evaluated. For three or more genetic instruments, the inverse variance-weighted meta-analysis was supplemented by sensitivity analyses, including MR Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode. The Bonferroni corrected p-value threshold was calculated using the total number of primary MR analyses performed.

We examined the association between genetically determined DNA methylation levels at each CpG site with fibrinogen levels. For significantly associated and replicated CpG sites from our study, genetic instruments were identified using a publicly available database of methylation quantitative trait loci (meQTLs) from the Genetics of DNA Methylation Consortium (GoDMC). (18) Genetic variants associated with each CpG site at p<0.05 were distance-pruned to select the most significant variant at each associated locus to use as genetic instruments (±1Mb). We obtained effect estimates for these instruments on fibrinogen levels from summary statistics of the largest published GWAS of fibrinogen. (6)

We also examined the association between genetically determined fibrinogen levels with DNA methylation levels at each CpG site. We used the largest published fibrinogen GWAS to identify genetic variants associated with fibrinogen according to the same significance threshold that de Vries et al. applied in their analysis (p-value < 2.5 × 10−8). (6) Genetic variants associated with fibrinogen were then distance-pruned to select the most significant variant at each associated locus to use as genetic instruments (±1Mb). Betas and standard errors for the association of these instruments with DNA methylation levels at the significantly associated and replicated CpG sites were obtained from association analyses within the ARIC study that are further described in the Supplementary Methods.

Annotation of associated CpG sites

For the epigenome-wide significant and cross-replicated CpG sites, the nearest genes were identified and annotated using the genomic coordinates provided by Illumina (GRCh37/hg19). They were also checked to see whether any of the probes were cross-reactive, any CpG sites were single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and whether a SNP exists in the probe binding sties. A CpG site was determined to be polymorphic when a SNP with a minor allele frequency ≥0.01 in the 1000 Genomes Project (Phase 1) resided at the position of the cytosine or guanine on either strand, or within 10 base pairs from the CpG within the probe binding site. (19) Additionally, the results were looked up in the EWAS Catalog to gain insights on existing findings on those associations present in the literature. (20) They were also compared to the results from the largest fibrinogen GWAS published (6), and overlapping genetic loci were identified based on distance (±1Mb). The associations of methylation at epigenome-wide significant and cross-replicated CpG sites with gene expression levels, also known as expression quantitative trait methylation sites (eQTMs), were identified using published results from the BIOS consortium. (21)

Lastly, to evaluate the correlation structure of the significant and replicated CpG sites, their pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated within the ARIC study to evaluate difference in correlation between population groups. Correlation coefficients were computed separately in the White and Black population groups, and then combined by computing the sample-size weighted mean correlation coefficient. All 83 significant and replicated CpG sites were ranked by array-specific meta-analysis p-values in ascending order. Then, any CpGs that were correlated with the top CpG site (r2 ≥ 0.1) were removed iteratively until a set of independent CpG sites were identified.

Percent Variance Explained

Percent variance explained was calculated in the ARIC White and Black population groups that were included in the meta-analysis and cross-replication. We utilized the identified independent CpG sites based on pairwise Pearson correlation R2. Race-stratified linear regression models were used to estimate the percent variance in fibrinogen levels. The null model included fibrinogen levels as the dependent variable, and all of the covariates used in the meta-analysis. The adjusted model additionally included independent CpG sites as independent variables. Then, the difference in adjusted R2 values for each race was calculated to estimate the percent variance explained by the statistically independent CpG sites.

Results

Study characteristics

Descriptive characteristics of studies in the 450K array (n = 12,904) and EPIC array studies (n = 5,133) are described in Table 1. The mean age at fibrinogen measurement ranged from 37.6 years (SD = 10.43) in the Netherlands Twin Register (NTR) to 79.1 years (SD = 0.58) in the LBC 1921. Mean fibrinogen level ranged from 2.74 g/L (SD = 0.66) from the NTR study to 3.88 g/L (SD = 0.87) in the Airwave study. Among all study participants, 58.4% were females (n = 10,531).

Table 1.

Characteristics of the 450K and EPIC array studies

Study Race* N Sex (% Female) Smoking (% Current smoker) Age (Mean, SD) BMI, kg/m2 (Mean, SD) Fibrinogen, g/L (Mean, SD)
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
450K array (n = 12,904)
ARIC Black 2271 62.97% 28.80% 53.25 5.72 29.72 6.05 3.19 0.66
ARIC White 753 60.96% 22.21% 55.69 5.14 25.81 4.32 2.93 0.58
CHS Black 312 61.50% 16.70% 73.1 5.36 28.5 5.06 3.38 0.71
CHS White 368 60.50% 0.92% 75 4.98 26.78 4.87 3.27 0.71
FHS_gen3 White 1443 52.18% 14.94% 45.39 7.9 27.72 5.62 3.34 0.65
FHS_umn White 1820 60.16% 23.68% 65.31 8.75 28.05 5.29 3.71 0.67
GENOA_450K Black 271 71.59% 10.33% 66.79 6.54 31.4 6.56 3.73 0.84
LBC21 White 407 60.14% 7.11% 79.14 0.58 26.2 4.06 3.6 0.6
LBC36 White 872 49.55% 11.35% 69.59 0.83 27.76 4.38 3.57 0.84
MARTHA White 336 79.00% 28.00% 43.69 14.07 24.24 4.45 3.33 0.64
MESA Black 231 56.28% 16.59% 60.62 9.14 30.92 5.75 3.61 0.79
MESA White 574 47.91% 12.20% 60.99 9.6 28.33 4.95 3.34 0.62
MESA Hispanic 380 49.47% 13.42% 58.81 9.29 29.46 4.87 3.54 0.68
NTR White 2796 66.20% 21.10% 37.6 12.7 24.3 4 2.74 0.66
TwinsUK White 70 100% 10% 55.73 10.43 24.93 3.63 3.16 0.8
EPIC array (n = 5,133)
Airwave White 894 41.83% 9.17% 41.05 9.21 27.17 4.42 3.881 0.865
GENOA_EPIC Black 922 71.27% 12.63% 62.71 9.63 31.8 6.72 3.68 0.81
LURIC White 829 29.60% 19.80% 62.6 10.5 27.5 4.05 3.77 0.55
SHIP-Trend White 195 57.44% 20% 48.2 12.48 26.89 4.05 2.94 0.68
SHS AI 2293 58.48% 38.33% 56.19 8.1 30.31 6.1 2.92 0.75
*

AI: American Indian

450K array meta-analysis

An overall summary of the meta-analyses and cross-replication results is shown in Figure 1. A total of 208 CpG sites were significantly associated (Bonferroni corrected p-value < 1.03 × 10−7) with fibrinogen levels in the meta-analysis of 450K array data (Table S1, Figure S1). Fibrinogen level was positively associated with 109 CpG sites and negatively associated with 99 CpG sites (Figure 2a).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Summary of the analysis approach and findings of the array-specific meta-analyses and cross-replication

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Volcano plots of A) 450K and B) EPIC array meta-analyses showing the effect size and p values of the included cytosine-phosphate-guanine sites. The horizontal blue line indicates the significance threshold.

EPIC array meta-analysis

In the EPIC array meta-analysis, we identified 87 CpG sites that were significantly associated with fibrinogen (Bonferroni corrected p-value ≥ 5.78 × 10−8) (Table S2). A Manhattan plot depicting the associations between all CpG sites and fibrinogen is shown in Figure S2. Fibrinogen was positively associated with 31 CpG sites and negatively associated with 56 CpG sites (Figure 2b).

Cross replication

Of the 208 CpG sites significantly associated with circulating fibrinogen levels in the 450K array analysis, 196 CpG sites were available on the EPIC array and 78 replicated in the EPIC array meta-analysis results (Table S3). For the significant associations from the EPIC array, out of 87 CpG sites, 33 were available on the 450K array and 26 replicated in the 450K array meta-analysis results (Table S4). When these results were combined, removing 21 overlapping CpG sites, 83 CpG sites remained significant (Table 2). The most significant CpG site from the 450K array, cg18181703 in SOCS3, (effect size = −0.023; p-value = 1.07 × 10−32) was also the strongest association in the EPIC array (effect size = −0.034, p-value = 6.32 × 10−24). When the 450K and EPIC array meta-analyses were combined for a meta-analysis, all 83 significant and cross-replicated CpG sites were significant in this meta-analysis (Table S5).

Table 2.

Significant and cross-replicated DNA methylation sites associated with circulating fibrinogen levels

CpG site Chr Position Effect size (450K) P-value (450K) Effect size (EPIC) P-value (EPIC) Gene
cg18181703 17 76354621 −0.0239 1.07E-32 −0.034 6.32E-24 SOCS3
cg16936953 17 57915665 −0.0351 2.26E-32 −0.0364 1.16E-13 VMP1
cg12054453 17 57915717 −0.036 1.16E-29 −0.0401 6.14E-18 VMP1
cg09349128 22 50327986 −0.0155 6.79E-28 −0.0194 4.02E-20 CRELD2
cg17501210 6 166970252 −0.023 7.47E-26 −0.0265 3.40E-16 RPS6KA2
cg18942579 17 57915773 −0.0269 7.42E-25 −0.0319 1.95E-12 VMP1
cg18608055 19 1130866 −0.0189 8.08E-25 −0.0157 9.75E-09 SBNO2
cg12992827 3 101901234 −0.021 2.86E-24 −0.0217 1.59E-10 ZPLD1
cg12170787 19 1130965 −0.0134 1.09E-23 −0.0103 6.66E-08 SBNO2
cg07573872 19 1126342 −0.0259 1.17E-23 −0.0198 3.74E-13 SBNO2
cg01409343 17 57915740 −0.0215 3.15E-22 −0.0192 2.70E-07 VMP1
cg02716826 9 33447032 −0.0168 6.29E-21 −0.0143 5.12E-07 AQP3
cg25325512 6 37142220 −0.0197 6.90E-21 −0.0235 9.96E-09 PIM1
cg10552523 11 313478 −0.0192 4.52E-20 −0.0203 1.95E-09 IFITM2
cg01971407 11 313624 −0.0167 9.27E-20 −0.0146 4.72E-06 IFITM2
cg10636246 1 159046973 −0.0206 3.32E-18 −0.0263 5.60E-13 AIM2
cg27469606 19 1154485 −0.007 1.31E-17 −0.0041 1.30E-04 SBNO2
cg18513344 3 195531298 −0.0105 2.87E-17 −0.0108 2.80E-09 MUC4
cg01059398 3 172235808 −0.0178 1.23E-16 −0.022 9.62E-11 TNFSF10
cg10508317 17 76355146 −0.0101 1.36E-16 −0.0058 4.32E-06 SOCS3
cg26804423 7 8201134 0.0113 1.43E-16 0.0101 6.08E-06 ICA1
cg23570810 11 315102 −0.0206 1.57E-16 −0.018 6.43E-05 IFITM2
cg20566897 11 313527 −0.0164 2.88E-16 −0.017 2.05E-04 IFITM2
cg01101459 1 234871477 0.0136 9.14E-16 0.0137 3.52E-10 LINC01132
cg19821297 19 12890029 −0.0159 9.20E-16 −0.0206 1.25E-11 HOOK2
cg26470501 19 45252955 −0.0131 9.23E-16 −0.0154 2.40E-08 BCL3
cg06051311 6 30131001 −0.0158 5.34E-15 −0.008 2.08E-04 TRIM15
cg10472711 7 797592 −0.0135 1.62E-14 −0.0119 7.39E-05 HEATR2
cg13781414 9 138951648 −0.0099 5.28E-14 −0.0106 6.43E-08 NACC2
cg27209729 11 64428925 −0.0181 1.58E-13 −0.0218 1.17E-06 NRXN2
cg00159243 12 109023799 −0.013 1.42E-12 −0.0159 4.04E-13 SELPLG
cg14162417 1 226315857 −0.0121 1.71E-12 −0.0125 1.38E-05 RP11-396C23.3
cg20995564 2 145172035 −0.0165 3.19E-12 −0.0217 6.43E-07 ZEB2
cg19459791 15 65363022 0.0115 4.06E-12 0.0154 2.55E-10 RASL12
cg18860310 4 87752504 −0.0111 1.34E-11 −0.0138 1.41E-06 SLC10A6
cg05316065 8 130799007 −0.0105 2.25E-11 −0.0102 1.92E-04 GSDMC
cg04326337 20 36664969 0.0208 3.24E-11 0.0127 4.16E-05 RPRD1B
cg24859433 6 30720203 −0.0081 4.84E-11 −0.007 1.01E-06 RN7SL353P
cg11032810 4 141057042 −0.0074 6.97E-11 −0.0075 2.08E-05 MAML3
cg12728588 1 36025489 0.0059 8.89E-11 0.0064 1.42E-04 NCDN
cg02112168 14 45579561 0.014 9.75E-11 0.0121 6.55E-05 PRPF39
cg15342087 6 30720209 −0.0074 1.32E-10 −0.0051 2.46E-05 RN7SL353P
cg15310871 8 20077936 0.0088 1.85E-10 0.0124 2.13E-10 ATP6V1B2
cg16896911 19 33895690 0.0105 2.07E-10 0.0138 2.52E-06 PEPD
cg22959742 10 13913931 0.0133 2.64E-10 0.0132 1.08E-04 FRMD4A
cg03940776 6 158490013 −0.0079 3.47E-10 −0.0084 4.63E-06 SYNJ2
cg03998636 13 111210121 −0.0093 3.87E-10 −0.0113 1.98E-06 RAB20
cg18217136 20 36157651 0.007 4.91E-10 0.0078 1.22E-05 PPIAP3
cg23866916 19 1155738 −0.008 5.21E-10 −0.0077 1.25E-04 SBNO2
cg26663590 16 28959310 0.0124 6.69E-10 0.0159 1.47E-06 NFATC2IP
cg06192883 15 52554171 0.0108 8.05E-10 0.0126 6.87E-06 MYO5C
cg04523589 3 48265146 0.0082 8.41E-10 0.0091 1.27E-05 CAMP
cg24678869 1 153919638 0.007 1.16E-09 0.0073 3.68E-05 DENND4B
cg10967866 10 134362164 0.012 1.34E-09 0.014 8.95E-06 INPP5A
cg02650017 17 47301614 −0.0039 1.71E-09 −0.0057 8.90E-15 PHOSPHO1
cg19769147 14 105860954 0.0075 2.52E-09 0.0083 3.84E-05 PACS2
cg07830855 6 56524142 0.009 3.21E-09 0.0098 8.91E-05 DST
cg14472551 11 33563060 0.0113 3.58E-09 0.0109 1.27E-04 KIAA1549L
cg17953136 2 20232577 0.0105 3.75E-09 0.0123 8.71E-05 LAPTM4A
cg19053223 7 105359070 0.0059 3.78E-09 0.0055 1.22E-04 ATXN7L1
cg01581098 7 105754353 0.0091 4.48E-09 0.0092 5.72E-05 SYPL1
cg05279866 8 37378355 0.0087 5.62E-09 0.0107 8.12E-06 RP11-150O12.1
cg00138407 3 47386505 0.0094 7.14E-09 0.0105 1.54E-04 KLHL18
cg20692268 1 25358981 −0.0115 8.60E-09 −0.0121 1.23E-04 MIR4425
cg02508743 8 56903623 0.0113 9.79E-09 0.0127 1.19E-05 LYN
cg15901722 5 175974973 −0.0105 1.06E-08 −0.0105 4.92E-06 CDHR2
cg17736772 1 155246828 0.007 1.41E-08 0.0081 1.22E-04 CLK2
cg04232816 2 96905390 0.0073 1.47E-08 0.0084 1.08E-04 STARD7-AS1
cg12269535 6 43142014 −0.0103 1.57E-08 −0.0132 6.91E-05 SRF
cg25653947 8 144443217 0.0071 1.68E-08 0.0106 1.74E-06 TOP1MT
cg25953130 10 63753550 −0.0167 2.25E-08 −0.0214 3.61E-05 ARID5B
cg27307975 15 58797839 −0.0066 2.34E-08 −0.0069 6.88E-07 LIPC
cg05304729 1 158800024 0.0117 3.86E-08 0.0118 5.51E-05 MNDA
cg23966214 17 48203188 −0.0066 5.19E-08 −0.0055 2.66E-05 SAMD14
cg05166473 16 88103629 0.0075 5.91E-08 0.0087 9.75E-06 BANP
cg13522406 6 30581820 0.0072 9.63E-08 0.0154 7.02E-07 PPP1R10
cg19137806 10 134362170 0.0094 1.01E-07 0.0126 4.10E-06 INPP5A
cg00607627 16 28995994 −0.0067 1.01E-07 −0.0074 3.32E-05 RP11-264B17.3
cg07719512 2 219246576 0.0059 4.97E-07 0.0107 7.04E-09 SLC11A1
cg25739715 22 30663881 −0.0038 1.95E-06 −0.0058 2.62E-10 OSM
cg25114611 6 35696870 −0.0075 7.10E-06 −0.0116 3.30E-08 FKBP5
cg22460173 19 6536042 0.0055 4.49E-05 0.0122 1.17E-08 TNFSF9
cg23842572 17 17030253 0.0061 4.50E-05 0.013 3.43E-09 MPRIP

Sensitivity analyses

In the setting of the ARIC study, the original model was additionally adjusted for CRP to identify a potential confounding effect of inflammation. The effects of all 83 significantly replicated loci were attenuated after adjustment (mean percent change in effect sizes [SD]: 35.41 [18.30] %) (Table S6, Figure S3–S4). In the sensitivity analysis addressing the time difference in measurements for fibrinogen and DNA methylation, the effect sizes of the 83 significant and replicated results from the main meta-analysis were generally consistent across three subsets of studies grouped according to the timing of the fibrinogen and DNA methylation measurements: 1) fibrinogen measurement predating DNA methylation measurement, 2) DNA methylation measurement predating fibrinogen measurement and 3) fibrinogen and DNA methylation measured at the same time (Table S7).

Also, in the setting of the ARIC study, we performed a sex-specific analysis, meta-analyzing sex-specific EWAS results for the White and Black population groups in the ARIC study. The effect sizes of the 83 significant and replicated results from the main meta-analysis were generally consistent with the effect sizes of the sex-specific analyses (Table S8). These effect sizes for male and female appear to be highly positively correlated with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9 (Figure S5).

Bidirectional Mendelian randomization

MR analysis evaluating a causal effect of DNA methylation on fibrinogen levels yielded 25 CpG sites that had one instrument, and 27 CpG sites with two or more instruments (Table S9). A Bonferroni corrected significance threshold of 9.62 × 10−4 (0.05/number of CpG sites that had one or more instruments) was applied. This analysis provided evidence for a causal effect of DNA methylation on fibrinogen levels at only one site: based on two genetic instruments, genetically determined levels of DNA methylation at cg02650017 in PHOSPHO1 were associated with fibrinogen levels (betaInverseVarianceWeighted = −0.02, p-value = 8.50 × 10−5) (Tables S9–S10). Because there were only two genetic instruments available for this CpG site, we were not able to perform sensitivity analyses that require three or more genetic instruments for this association. MR analyses did not provide any evidence for a causal effect of fibrinogen levels on DNA methylation, using 38 genetic instruments, as there were no significant associations between genetically determined fibrinogen levels and DNA methylation at CpG sites (Tables S11–S12).

Annotation

None of the 83 significant and cross-replicated CpG sites had cross-reactive probes, were a SNP, or harbored a SNP existing in the probe binding sites (Table S5). According to the EWAS Catalog, 16 distinct CpG sites out of the 83 significant and cross-replicated CpG sites identified 69 associations in previous EWAS of various phenotypes including CRP, BMI, smoking and inflammatory bowel disease, among many (Table S13). When the significant and cross-replicated CpG sites were checked against the findings from the fibrinogen GWAS (6), there were 6 CpG sites that were located near four significant loci from the fibrinogen GWAS (Table S14). These included cg24678869 near IL6R gene, cg25653947 near PLEC gene, cg26663590 near ATXN2L gene, and cg09349128 near SHANK3 gene. We identified 37 CpG sites that were associated with altered gene expression levels of one or more genes in the eQTM database from the BIOS Consortium (Table S15). In 5 cases, DNA methylation and gene expression were positively associated, and in 32 cases, they were inversely associated. There was widespread correlation amongst the significant and replicated CpG sites, as shown in Figure S6, including both positive and negative correlations. After removing correlated CpG sites according to r2 ≥ 0.1, there were 10 independent CpG sites (cg01059398, cg07830855, cg07573872, cg05316065, cg14162417, cg00607627, cg20692268, cg00138407, cg17501210, and cg19459791) (Table S16). The 10 independent CpG sites identified above, explained 2.56% and 2.41% of the variance of fibrinogen in the White and Black population groups in the ARIC study, respectively.

Discussion

In this meta-analysis of fibrinogen EWAS, we identified and cross-replicated 83 CpG sites located in or near 70 loci that were significantly associated with circulating fibrinogen levels. After accounting for the correlation structure, there were 10 statistically independent CpG sites. Many of these associations remained significant, but were attenuated when additionally adjusted for CRP levels, suggesting that the associations are at least partially driven by inflammation.

Fibrinogen plays an important role in inflammatory pathways, and it is well-established that fibrinogen expression is upregulated in response to inflammatory stimuli during the acute phase response. Indeed, most inflammatory diseases, including both acute and chronic settings are associated with cytokine-mediated elevation of fibrinogen. (3, 22) Thus, it is indeed expected that the current EWAS would uncover this relationship. Notably, the sensitivity analysis adjusting additionally for CRP showed that the associations for all 83 replicated CpG sites were attenuated after CRP adjustment, although many of them remained nominally significant. Additionally, 59 of the 83 CpG sites that were significantly associated with fibrinogen in our study were also reported in a previous EWAS of CRP. (8) Thus, our findings suggest that this relationship may also be due to methylation events that have an effect on both fibrinogen and inflammation, in addition to previously defined synthetic mechanisms (IL-6, IL-6 receptor and JAK/STAT signaling pathways).

Several of the loci associated with both fibrinogen and CRP harbor important inflammatory genes, including AIM2, BCL3, and SOCS3. DNA methylation at cg10636246 near AIM2 was inversely associated with fibrinogen levels as well as with AIM2 mRNA expression. AIM2 is associated with secretion of IL-18, a proinflammatory cytokine that leads to activation of the STAT3 pathway and upregulation of fibrinogen expression. (23, 24) Another CpG site, cg26470501, was located near the BCL3 gene. B-cell leukemia 3 (BCL3) is a member of the IkB family, and IkB proteins constitute an important element of the NF-kB signal transduction pathway. (25) Specifically, BCL3 is a nuclear protein that is heavily involved in regulating NF-kB activity. (26) Activation of the NF-kB pathway leads to the production of inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha and IL-1β. IL-1β has been demonstrated to bind to fibrinogen to facilitate inflammatory and hemostatic responses at sites of injury. (27) DNA methylation at this CpG site was inversely associated with both fibrinogen levels and BCL3 mRNA expression. Since fibrinogen is highly expressed during an acute-phase inflammatory response and activation of the NF-kB pathway, it is biologically plausible that the association between fibrinogen and DNA methylation at this CpG site is driven by inflammation. (3) Hypomethylation at cg18181703, located in the SOCS3 gene, was associated with increased fibrinogen levels as well as increased SOCS3 mRNA expression in whole blood. SOCS3 suppresses proinflammatory cytokine signaling by downregulating STAT3, which upregulates the expression of fibrinogen and other acute-phase proteins. (28, 29) Thus, based on this known biology, we would expect hypomethylation of SOCS3 to be associated with decreased, not increased levels of fibrinogen. It is unclear why hypomethylation of SOCS3 was associated with increased levels of fibrinogen in our study, but it is possible that this can be explained by reverse causation, or a third variable associated with both SOCS3 methylation and fibrinogen. Notably, hypomethylation at this CpG site was also associated with increased CRP levels, (8) and CpG sites near SOCS3 have been reported in association with several other phenotypes related to inflammation, including BMI (12, 30–32), inflammatory bowel disease (33) including Crohn’s disease (34), and smoking (35–38).

Our MR found that genetically determined DNA methylation at cg02650017 was associated with fibrinogen levels. In addition, meQTLs for cg02650017 were associated with expression of PHOSPHO1, indicating that PHOSPHO1 may regulate fibrinogen levels. PHOSPHO1 has an established function in biomineralization, (39, 40) and genomic association studies also suggest a role in glycemia. Variants in PHOSPHO1 are associated with fasting insulin levels, and DNA methylation at PHOSPHO1 is associated with decreased risk of future type 2 diabetes mellitus. (41, 42) Furthermore, DNA methylation levels at this CpG site was shown to be associated with levels of coagulation factor VIII, a co-factor for factor IX-mediated activation of factor X, which leads to production of thrombin and ultimately, conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin, in the Jackson Heart Study. (2, 43) The association of methylation at PHOSPHO1 with both fibrinogen and factor VIII suggests that this locus may regulate coagulation more broadly.

Our study had several strengths. First, the use of a large consortium-based study population, allowed for the identification of more generalizable associations. While different ethnic compositions may have attributed to decreased replication rate, this conversely also implies that the CpG sites that cross-replicated were more generalizable across different population groups. Second, our use of a cross-replication approach ensures the robustness of the 83 reported associations.

This study also had limitations. First, not all included studies used concurrent blood samples for the measurement of fibrinogen and DNA methylation. Our sensitivity analysis found consistent results regardless of temporal differences, suggesting the impact of this limitation is likely to be minor. Second, DNA methylation levels are tissue-specific, and we only measured DNA methylation in circulating leukocytes. Consequently, our study was not designed to identify associations with CpG sites where DNA methylation in other tissues regulates fibrinogen levels, such as in liver where fibrinogen is produced. Third, although we adjusted for cell type proportions in our analyses, there may be residual confounding due to cell subtype proportion heterogeneity. (44, 45) Fourth, we had limited statistical power to assess the association between genetically determined fibrinogen levels and DNA methylation in our MR analyses. The 38 genetic instruments for fibrinogen only explain approximately 3% of the variance in fibrinogen levels (6), and our sample size to assess the association of these instruments with DNA methylation was relatively modest. Finally, the estimates of the variance in fibrinogen levels explained by the 10 statistically independent CpG sites may be overestimated because the ARIC study that was used for this analysis was also included in our EWAS.

In conclusion, we performed the first meta-analysis of EWAS of circulating fibrinogen levels, using multi-ethnic data from participants in a large consortium of epidemiological cohort studies. We identified 83 CpG sites where circulating leukocyte DNA methylation is robustly associated with circulating fibrinogen levels. Inflammation appears to play an important role in the relationship between DNA methylation and fibrinogen levels. These observations support the need to define the complex interplay between fibrinogen and inflammatory pathways, and to functionally and causally connect DNA methylation and fibrinogen levels.

Supplementary Material

1
2
3

Essentials.

  • Circulating fibrinogen levels may be determined by inter-individual differences in DNA methylation at CpG sites, and vice versa.

  • An epigenome-wide association study of circulating fibrinogen levels in 18,037 participants was performed.

  • There were 83 replicated CpG sites located in 61 loci that were associated with circulating fibrinogen levels.

  • Associations found in the analyses are partially driven by inflammatory pathways shared by both fibrinogen and C-reactive protein.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) grant R01 HL141291. The CHARGE Hemostasis Working Group is further supported by NHLBI grant R01 HL134894, while infrastructure for the CHARGE Consortium is supported in part by the NHLBI grant R01 HL105756.

Study-specific acknowledgements are provided in the Supplementary Methods.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Paul Elliott acknowledges support from the Medical Research Council for the MRC Centre for Environment and Health (MR/S019669/1). PE is supported by the UK Dementia Research Institute which receives funding from a UKDRI sponsored consortium of the Medical Research Council, Alzheimer’s Society and Alzheimer’s Research UK (MC_PC_17114). Dr. David-Alexandre Trégouët was supported by the EPIDEMIOM-VT Senior Chair from the University of Bordeaux initiative of excellence IdEX. Dr. Jenny van Dongen is supported by NWO Large Scale infrastructures, X-Omics (184.034.019). DIB acknowledges the Royal Netherlands Academy of Science Professor Award (PAH/6635). Dr. Hans J. Grabe has received travel grants and speakers honoraria from Fresenius Medical Care, Neuraxpharm, Servier and Janssen Cilag as well as research funding from Fresenius Medical Care. Dr. Maria Sabater-Lleal is supported by a Miguel Servet contract from the ISCIII Spanish Health Institute (CP17/00142) and co-financed by the European Social Fund. The remaining authors state that they have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Spinou A and Koulouris NG (2018) Current clinical management of smoke inhalation injuries: a reality check. Eur Respir J, 52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pieters M and Wolberg AS (2019) Fibrinogen and fibrin: An illustrated review. Res Pract Thromb Haemost, 3, 161–172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Davalos D and Akassoglou K (2012) Fibrinogen as a key regulator of inflammation in disease. Semin Immunopathol, 34, 43–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, Pennells L, Wood AM, White IR, Gao P, Walker M, Thompson A, Sarwar N, Caslake M et al. (2012) C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and cardiovascular disease prediction. N Engl J Med, 367, 1310–1320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Danesh J, Lewington S, Thompson SG, Lowe GD, Collins R, Kostis JB, Wilson AC, Folsom AR, Wu K, Benderly M et al. (2005) Plasma fibrinogen level and the risk of major cardiovascular diseases and nonvascular mortality: an individual participant meta-analysis. JAMA, 294, 1799–1809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.de Vries PS, Chasman DI, Sabater-Lleal M, Chen M-H, Huffman JE, Steri M, Tang W, Teumer A, Marioni RE, Grossmann V et al. (2016) A meta-analysis of 120 246 individuals identifies 18 new loci for fibrinogen concentration. Human molecular genetics, 25, 358–370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sabater-Lleal M, Huang J, Chasman D, Naitza S, Dehghan A, Johnson AD, Teumer A, Reiner AP, Folkersen L, Basu S et al. (2013) Multiethnic meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies in >100 000 subjects identifies 23 fibrinogen-associated Loci but no strong evidence of a causal association between circulating fibrinogen and cardiovascular disease. Circulation, 128, 1310–1324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ligthart S, Marzi C, Aslibekyan S, Mendelson MM, Conneely KN, Tanaka T, Colicino E, Waite LL, Joehanes R, Guan W et al. (2016) DNA methylation signatures of chronic low-grade inflammation are associated with complex diseases. Genome Biol, 17, 255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Weinhold B (2006) Epigenetics: the science of change. Environ Health Perspect, 114, A160–167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jaenisch R and Bird A (2003) Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet, 33 Suppl, 245–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Braun KVE, Dhana K, de Vries PS, Voortman T, van Meurs JBJ, Uitterlinden AG, Hofman A, Hu FB, Franco OH, Dehghan A et al. (2017) Epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) on lipids: the Rotterdam Study. Clin Epigenetics, 9, 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wahl S, Drong A, Lehne B, Loh M, Scott WR, Kunze S, Tsai PC, Ried JS, Zhang W, Yang Y et al. (2017) Epigenome-wide association study of body mass index, and the adverse outcomes of adiposity. Nature, 541, 81–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Clauss A (1957) [Rapid physiological coagulation method in determination of fibrinogen]. Acta Haematol, 17, 237–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moran S, Arribas C and Esteller M (2016) Validation of a DNA methylation microarray for 850,000 CpG sites of the human genome enriched in enhancer sequences. Epigenomics, 8, 389–399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Willer CJ, Li Y and Abecasis GR (2010) METAL: fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide association scans. Bioinformatics, 26, 2190–2191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pepys MB and Hirschfield GM (2003) C-reactive protein: a critical update. J Clin Invest, 111, 1805–1812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pierce BL and Burgess S (2013) Efficient design for Mendelian randomization studies: subsample and 2-sample instrumental variable estimators. Am J Epidemiol, 178, 1177–1184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Min JL, Hemani G, Hannon E, Dekkers KF, Castillo-Fernandez J, Luijk R, Carnero-Montoro E, Lawson DJ, Burrows K, Suderman M et al. (2021) Genomic and phenotypic insights from an atlas of genetic effects on DNA methylation. Nat Genet, 53, 1311–1321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Barfield RT, Almli LM, Kilaru V, Smith AK, Mercer KB, Duncan R, Klengel T, Mehta D, Binder EB, Epstein MP et al. (2014) Accounting for population stratification in DNA methylation studies. Genet Epidemiol, 38, 231–241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Battram T, Yousefi P, Crawford G, Prince C, Sheikhali Babaei M, Sharp G, Hatcher C, Vega-Salas M, Khodabakhsh S, Whitehurst O et al. (2022) The EWAS Catalog: a database of epigenome-wide association studies [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. Wellcome Open Research, 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bonder MJ, Luijk R, Zhernakova DV, Moed M, Deelen P, Vermaat M, van Iterson M, van Dijk F, van Galen M, Bot J et al. (2017) Disease variants alter transcription factor levels and methylation of their binding sites. Nat Genet, 49, 131–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Long W, Yang J, Li Z, Li J, Chen S, Chen D, Wang S, Li Q, Hu D, Huang J et al. (2021) Abnormal Fibrinogen Level as a Prognostic Indicator in Coronavirus Disease Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Front Med (Lausanne), 8, 687220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fish RJ and Neerman-Arbez M (2012) Fibrinogen gene regulation. Thromb Haemost, 108, 419–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fuller GM and Zhang Z (2001) Transcriptional control mechanism of fibrinogen gene expression. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 936, 469–479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Viatour P, Merville MP, Bours V and Chariot A (2005) Phosphorylation of NF-kappaB and IkappaB proteins: implications in cancer and inflammation. Trends Biochem Sci, 30, 43–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brasier AR, Lu M, Hai T, Lu Y and Boldogh I (2001) NF-kappa B-inducible BCL-3 expression is an autoregulatory loop controlling nuclear p50/NF-kappa B1 residence. J Biol Chem, 276, 32080–32093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sahni A, Guo M, Sahni SK and Francis CW (2004) Interleukin-1beta but not IL-1alpha binds to fibrinogen and fibrin and has enhanced activity in the bound form. Blood, 104, 409–414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang L, Yang Z, Ma A, Qu Y, Xia S, Xu D, Ge C, Qiu B, Xia Q, Li J et al. (2014) Growth arrest and DNA damage 45G down-regulation contributes to Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 activation and cellular senescence evasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology, 59, 178–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chaves de Souza JA, Nogueira AV, Chaves de Souza PP, Kim YJ, Silva Lobo C, Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira, G.J., Cirelli, J.A., Garlet, G.P. and Rossa, C., Jr. (2013) SOCS3 expression correlates with severity of inflammation, expression of proinflammatory cytokines, and activation of STAT3 and p38 MAPK in LPS-induced inflammation in vivo. Mediators Inflamm, 2013, 650812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mendelson MM, Marioni RE, Joehanes R, Liu C, Hedman AK, Aslibekyan S, Demerath EW, Guan W, Zhi D, Yao C et al. (2017) Association of Body Mass Index with DNA Methylation and Gene Expression in Blood Cells and Relations to Cardiometabolic Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Approach. PLoS Med, 14, e1002215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ali O, Cerjak D, Kent JW Jr., James R, Blangero J, Carless MA and Zhang Y (2016) Methylation of SOCS3 is inversely associated with metabolic syndrome in an epigenome-wide association study of obesity. Epigenetics, 11, 699–707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sun D, Zhang T, Su S, Hao G, Chen T, Li QZ, Bazzano L, He J, Wang X, Li S et al. (2019) Body Mass Index Drives Changes in DNA Methylation: A Longitudinal Study. Circ Res, 125, 824–833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ventham NT, Kennedy NA, Adams AT, Kalla R, Heath S, O’Leary KR, Drummond H, consortium IB, consortium IC, Wilson DC et al. (2016) Integrative epigenome-wide analysis demonstrates that DNA methylation may mediate genetic risk in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Commun, 7, 13507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Somineni HK, Venkateswaran S, Kilaru V, Marigorta UM, Mo A, Okou DT, Kellermayer R, Mondal K, Cobb D, Walters TD et al. (2019) Blood-Derived DNA Methylation Signatures of Crohn’s Disease and Severity of Intestinal Inflammation. Gastroenterology, 156, 2254–2265 e2253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Joehanes R, Just AC, Marioni RE, Pilling LC, Reynolds LM, Mandaviya PR, Guan W, Xu T, Elks CE, Aslibekyan S et al. (2016) Epigenetic Signatures of Cigarette Smoking. Circ Cardiovasc Genet, 9, 436–447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dugue PA, Jung CH, Joo JE, Wang X, Wong EM, Makalic E, Schmidt DF, Baglietto L, Severi G, Southey MC et al. (2020) Smoking and blood DNA methylation: an epigenome-wide association study and assessment of reversibility. Epigenetics, 15, 358–368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sikdar S, Joehanes R, Joubert BR, Xu CJ, Vives-Usano M, Rezwan FI, Felix JF, Ward JM, Guan W, Richmond RC et al. (2019) Comparison of smoking-related DNA methylation between newborns from prenatal exposure and adults from personal smoking. Epigenomics, 11, 1487–1500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Christiansen C, Castillo-Fernandez JE, Domingo-Relloso A, Zhao W, El-Sayed Moustafa JS, Tsai PC, Maddock J, Haack K, Cole SA, Kardia SLR et al. (2021) Novel DNA methylation signatures of tobacco smoking with trans-ethnic effects. Clin Epigenetics, 13, 36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Huesa C, Yadav MC, Finnila MA, Goodyear SR, Robins SP, Tanner KE, Aspden RM, Millan JL and Farquharson C (2011) PHOSPHO1 is essential for mechanically competent mineralization and the avoidance of spontaneous fractures. Bone, 48, 1066–1074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yadav MC, Simao AM, Narisawa S, Huesa C, McKee MD, Farquharson C and Millan JL (2011) Loss of skeletal mineralization by the simultaneous ablation of PHOSPHO1 and alkaline phosphatase function: a unified model of the mechanisms of initiation of skeletal calcification. J Bone Miner Res, 26, 286–297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Petty LE, Highland HM, Gamazon ER, Hu H, Karhade M, Chen HH, de Vries PS, Grove ML, Aguilar D, Bell GI et al. (2019) Functionally oriented analysis of cardiometabolic traits in a trans-ethnic sample. Hum Mol Genet, 28, 1212–1224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dayeh T, Tuomi T, Almgren P, Perfilyev A, Jansson PA, de Mello VD, Pihlajamaki J, Vaag A, Groop L, Nilsson E et al. (2016) DNA methylation of loci within ABCG1 and PHOSPHO1 in blood DNA is associated with future type 2 diabetes risk. Epigenetics, 11, 482–488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Raffield LM, Lu AT, Szeto MD, Little A, Grinde KE, Shaw J, Auer PL, Cushman M, Horvath S, Irvin MR et al. (2020) Coagulation factor VIII: Relationship to cardiovascular disease risk and whole genome sequence and epigenome-wide analysis in African Americans. J Thromb Haemost, 18, 1335–1347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Birney E, Smith GD and Greally JM (2016) Epigenome-wide Association Studies and the Interpretation of Disease -Omics. PLoS Genet, 12, e1006105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Michels KB, Binder AM, Dedeurwaerder S, Epstein CB, Greally JM, Gut I, Houseman EA, Izzi B, Kelsey KT, Meissner A et al. (2013) Recommendations for the design and analysis of epigenome-wide association studies. Nat Methods, 10, 949–955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2
3

RESOURCES