Table 3.
Index | Optimum cutoff value | Sensitivity | Specificity | Jordan value | AUC | P | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage of eosinophils in tissue | 13.85 | 0.641 | 0.59 | 0.231 | 0.654 | 0.003 | 0.560-0.749 |
Serum sIGE | 3.65 IU/ml | 0.564 | 0.857 | 0.421 | 0.773 | <0.001 | 0.684-0.862 |
IL-5 | 66.45 ng/L | 0.821 | 0.907 | 0.728 | 0.927 | <0.001 | 0.883-0.971 |
ECP | 58.65 μg/L | 0.564 | 0.708 | 0.272 | 0.680 | <0.001 | 0.584-0.777 |
PH value of intraoperative flush solution | - | 0.692 | 0.677 | 0.369 | 0.685 | <0.001 | 0.591-0.778 |
Postoperative nasal environment | - | 0.692 | 0.783 | 0.475 | 0.737 | <0.001 | 0.645-0.829 |
Note: Among them, the PH value of the operative rinsing solution and the condition of the postoperative nasal internal environment were dichotomous variables. pH = 6 of the operative rinsing solution was assigned as 0 and pH = 8 as 1. The status of the postoperative nasal internal environment was assigned as 0, and the infection of the nasal internal environment as 1. ECRSwNP, eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps; ECP, eosinophil cationic protein.