Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 15;16(10):5923–5932. doi: 10.62347/VNQF3805

Table 2.

Comparison of clinical data between Preterm birth and full-term group in PROM population

Clinical data Preterm birth group (n=43) Full-term group (n=57) t/χ2 P
Age 36.2±6.1 32.9±4.3 4.847 0.021
BMI before pregnancy 25.2±5.8 23.8±7.2 2.078 0.232
Multipara 3 (7.0%) 7 (12.3%) 0.026 0.081
Assisted reproduction and pregnancy 7 (16.3%) 4 (7.0%) 0.570 0.650
CL 22.2±3.2 29.0±4.2 4.855 0.033
Operation mode 6.22 0.023
    LEEP 4 (9.3%) 26 (45.6%)
    CKC 40 (93.0%) 29 (50.9%)
Cervical canceration 4.036 0.079
    CIN1 4 (9.3%) 11 (19.3%)
    CIN2 13 (30.2%) 27 (47.4%)
    CIN3 26 (60.5%) 19 (33.3%)
Time after conization 8.315 0.002
    6-12 months 20 (46.5%) 6 (10.5%)
    12-24 months 13 (30.2%) 24 (42.1%)
    >24 months 10 (23.3%) 27 (47.4%)

Note: CL: cervical length; LEEP: Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure; CKC: Cold Knife Conization; PROM: premature rupture of membrane.