Table I. —List of suggestions for future longitudinal studies based on muscle synergies.
Aspect | Suggestions |
---|---|
Enrolled patients and volunteers | Detailed characterization of the study population. Larger sample size. Patient-specific analyses to minimize inter-subject variability. Careful selection of control groups for accurate comparisons. Uniform definition of stroke type and recovery stage. |
Types of interventions | Optimization of robotic devices and protocols for effectiveness. Investigation of different forms of robotic assistance. Exploration of muscle synergies across various rehabilitative contexts. |
Protocols for rehabilitation sessions | Incorporation of movement variability in protocols. Comparison between patient’s affected and unaffected limb and healthy subject’s limb. Introduction of complex, 3D and multi-planar movements. Personalized rehabilitation programs based on muscle synergies. |
Protocols for synergy extraction | Use of diverse models and algorithms for synergy extraction. Consideration of temporal coefficients in synergy analyses. Standardization of electrode positioning. Training and familiarization of subjects with experimental tasks. |
Variation of the number of synergies | Investigation of the impact of interventions on muscle synergy number. Understanding of the relationship between synergy number and motor impairment severity. When possible, avoid fixing the number of synergies a priori. Use multiple R2/VAF thresholds or more accurate methods for determining the number of muscle synergies. |
Variation of synergies structure | Examination of how interventions impact muscle synergy structure. Understanding of the relationship between muscle synergy structure and motor function recovery. |
Variation of temporal coefficients | Emphasis on changes in temporal coefficients post-intervention. Exploration of the relationship between temporal coefficients and motor function recovery. |
Clinical and instrumental findings | Investigation of the relationship between muscle synergies and clinical outcomes. Use of multidomain assessments (e.g., kinematics, EEG). Exploration of muscle synergies as a biomarker for motor impairment and recovery. |