Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 14:15910199241289628. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1177/15910199241289628

Table 3.

D-dimer predictive ability of different post-thrombectomy outcomes.

Reference Cutoff (µg/mL) OR (95%CI) Specificity Sensitivity PPV NPV Accuracy AUC
Successful recanalization
Ohbuchi et al. 6.7 5.51 (1.80–16.88) 36% 91% 79% 60% 76% -
First-pass effect
Xie and Tang 0.97 0.81 (0.52–0.96) 79% 79.30% - 87% - 0.761
Baek et al. 1.09 0.92 (0.85–0.98)/500 ng/mL 47.90% 76.10% - - - 0.631
Reocclusion
Li W. et al. - 1.06 (1.01–1.12) - - - - - -
Favorable outcome
Baek et al. 0.67 0.88 (0.81–0.97) per 500 ng/mL 70.30% 67% - - - 0.722
Li J. et al. - 1.14 (1.04–1.26) - - - - - -
Ohbuchi et al. 1.9 3.86 (1.27–11.75) 62% 64% 45% 78% 63% -
Hisamitus et al. 1.9 1.27 (1.0–1.6) 80% 60.60% - - - -
Lee et al. - 1.524 (1.043–2.226)* - - - - - -
Low DVT
Han et al. 1.62 1.350 (1.150–1.585) 70.20% 71.60% - - - 0.749
sICH
Qiu et al. 2.27 2.45 (1.75–3.43) 86.20% 64.60% - 94.60% - 0.774

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; PPV and NPV: positive and negative predictive values; AUC: area under the curve.

*Association with unfavorable functional outcome; - Outcome was not reported by this study.