Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 13;14:27883. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77633-x

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Visualization of the effectiveness of RN and RAIN for VS (red) and cochleas (sky-blue) according to different normalization configurations of TANQ; (a) real ceT1 images, (b)-(d) pseudo-hrT2 images from ceT1 images generated by TANQ with different normalization configurations, and (e) real hrT2 images. In the real ceT1 images, the intensity of the VS is higher than that of other tissues due to the contrast agent, while the VS in the real hrT2 images shows similar intensity to other tissues. Conversely, the cochlea exhibits very low intensity in real ceT1 images (a), whereas it appears relatively distinct in real hrT2 images (e).