. 2024 Nov 13;14:27883. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77633-x

Table 2.

Quantitative results from the ablation study. The results were obtained without conducting self-training. The paired t-test was conducted to assess the statistical significance of our results. $(* p < 0.05, * * p < 0.0001)$ .

Method	Dice score ( $↑$ )			ASSD ( $↓$ )
Method	VS	Cochlea	Mean	VS	Cochlea
CycleGAN³³	0.7798 (±0.1901)*	0.8066 (±0.0323)**	0.7932 (±0.0972)	0.8750 (±0.9222)*	0.2422 (±0.1608)**
CUT¹⁶	0.7693 (±0.2097)*	0.7950 (±0.0337)**	0.7822 (±0.1095)	0.7126 (±0.6179)*	0.2586 (±0.1668)**
QS-Attn¹⁸	0.7779 (±0.1825)*	0.8158 (±0.0287)**	0.7968 (±0.0929)	0.6667 (±0.3891)*	0.2365 (±0.1573)**
Multi-view¹⁷	0.8043 (±0.1656)	0.8158 (±0.0289)**	0.8101 (±0.0863)	0.5742 (±0.2461)*	0.2387 (±0.1581)**
Ours (w/o. RAIN)	0.8017 (±0.1696)	0.8372 (±0.0304)*	0.8195 (±0.0896)	1.3809 (±6.5339)	0.2070 (±0.1608)*
Ours (w/o. SegDecoder)	0.8057 (±0.1356)	0.8393 (±0.0299)	0.8225 (±0.0716)	1.7198 (±6.5030)*	0.2064 (±0.1597)
Ours	0.8097 (±0.1635)	0.8397 (±0.0293)	0.8247 (±0.0863)	0.5708 (±0.2919)	0.2042 (±0.1610)