Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 12;2012(12):CD004609. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004609.pub3

Rockswold 1992.

Methods Randomised, controlled trial. Observers ("medical assessors") blinded, but not patients or carers.
Participants Patients with a history of closed head injury with GCS of < 10 for > 6 hours and < 24 hours.
Interventions HBOT at 1.5 ATA for 1 hour every 8 eight hours for 2 weeks or until death or waking (average number of treatments = 21). Standard care described as 'intensive neurosurgical care according to a comprehensive protocol' was delivered to both groups.
Outcomes Favourable functional outcome (GOS 1 or 2), mortality, intra‐cranial pressure and adverse events.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not stated: "random assignment of the patient'.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Possible and although not clearly described, consent prior to randomisation: "After eligibility and the GCS score were established, informed consent was obtained. Random assignment of the patient.....then occurred".
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Observers were blinded but not carers or patients, main outcomes relatively hard: "Outcome was assessed by blinded independent examiners".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Secondary interim outcomes had significant losses to follow‐up. Only two control patients were lost to all follow‐up: "Two control patients were lost to follow‐up...therefore the 12‐month outcome analyses are based on ... a total of 166 patients".
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All flagged outcomes were reported.
Other bias High risk Change in protocol for myringotomy during the course has affected some outcomes (discussed in this review).