Table 1.
Quantitative measure collected | Time point for data collection | Explanation | ||
|
Baseline | 3 months | 9 months |
|
Screening questions | ✓ |
|
Age, province of residence, and description of the stage of their relationship with their abusive partner | |
Demographic information | ✓ |
|
|
Education, marital status, and diversity characteristics (eg, immigrant status, francophone status, ethnic status, and rural status) |
WEBa | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | To measure women’s experiences of feeling fearful and controlled by their abusive partner [43] |
DCSb | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | To measure the conflict (ie, difficulty) that women endure in making decisions about leaving their abusive relationship [44] |
IPVc strategies index | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | To measure the different types of IPV strategies that women are using to keep themselves safe in their abusive relationship [45] |
SF-12v2d | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | To measure quality of life [46] |
CES-De | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | To measure depressive symptoms [47] |
ISELf | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | To measure perceived social support [48] |
aWEB: Women’s Experiences of Battery Scale.
bDCS: Decisional Conflict Scale.
cIPV: intimate partner violence.
dSF-12v2: Short Form Health Survey.
eCES-D: The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale.
fISEL: The Interpersonal Support Evaluation List.