Table 4.

AME of resource availability across all public health facilities on pharmacy practices using alternate regression models

	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)
	Customers advised on medicine use	Customers given injections	Customers administered IV fluids	Branded medicine share	Branded generics share
	Rural
	Panel A: Tobit
Availability of workers	0.084	−0.198***	−0.052	−0.000	0.001***
	(0.233)	(0.059)	(0.083)	(0.001)	(0.000)
Availability of medicines	−0.048	−0.209***	−0.137***	−0.000	0.000*
	(0.083)	(0.053)	(0.051)	(0.001)	(0.000)
	383	383	383	383	383
	Panel B: Poisson or Fractional regression
Availability of workers	−0.013	−0.193	0.016	0.000	0.001***
	(0.385)	(0.149)	(0.151)	(0.001)	(0.000)
Availability of medicines	0.066	−0.099	−0.043	−0.000	0.001
	(0.080)	(0.094)	(0.045)	(0.001)	(0.000)
Observations	383	383	383	383	383
	Urban
	Panel C: Tobit
Availability of workers	−1.015*	0.168***	0.012***	0.003	0.000
	(0.553)	(0.047)	(0.000)	(0.003)	(0.001)
Availability of medicines	−0.135	0.037	0.014***	−0.001	0.001
	(0.178)	(0.023)	(0.000)	(0.002)	(0.001)
	166	166	166	166	166
	Panel D: Poisson or Fractional regression or Poisson
Availability of workers	−1.138**	0.201	0.013	0.003	0.000
	(0.566)	(0.137)	(0.012)	(0.002)	(0.001)
Availability of medicines	0.196	−0.116**	0.009***	−0.001	0.001
	(0.223)	(0.045)	(0.001)	(0.002)	(0.001)
Observations	166	166	166	166	166

Note(s): All regressions include block fixed effects and controls for pharmacy characteristics such as registration status, hours the store is open in a week, number of employees, number of customers in a week and number of other pharmacies in the 3-km circle around the pharmacy. Robust standard errors in parentheses, clustered at the district level.

^***indicates significance at 1% level.

^**at 5% level.

^*at 10% level.