Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Nov 14;83(12):1762–1772. doi: 10.1136/ard-2024-225868

Table 2.

Random forests classification metrics in cross-validation

Classification task* Validation method Accuracy Specificity Sensitivity PPV NPV
Active GCA versus controls 10-fold CV 95.0% 96.7% 93.3% 96.7% 93.5%
Inactive GCA versus controls 10-fold CV 98.3% 100% 96.7% 100% 96.8%
Active GCA versus inactive GCA Leave-one-patient-out 51.7% 46.7% 56.7% 51.5% 51.9%
*

Classification tasks were performed using the default configurations of the random forest classifier from the sci-kit learn library (V.1.3.2) in Python. Classification metrics were calculated as the ratio of total correct predictions to total predictions, as defined for each metric, across each fold of cross-validation method.

GCA, giant cell arteritis; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.