Table 2.
Classification task* | Validation method | Accuracy | Specificity | Sensitivity | PPV | NPV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Active GCA versus controls | 10-fold CV | 95.0% | 96.7% | 93.3% | 96.7% | 93.5% |
Inactive GCA versus controls | 10-fold CV | 98.3% | 100% | 96.7% | 100% | 96.8% |
Active GCA versus inactive GCA | Leave-one-patient-out | 51.7% | 46.7% | 56.7% | 51.5% | 51.9% |
Classification tasks were performed using the default configurations of the random forest classifier from the sci-kit learn library (V.1.3.2) in Python. Classification metrics were calculated as the ratio of total correct predictions to total predictions, as defined for each metric, across each fold of cross-validation method.
GCA, giant cell arteritis; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.