Table 2. Random forests classification metrics in cross-validation.
Classification task* | Validation method | Accuracy | Specificity | Sensitivity | PPV | NPV |
Active GCA versus controls | 10-fold CV | 95.0% | 96.7% | 93.3% | 96.7% | 93.5% |
Inactive GCA versus controls | 10-fold CV | 98.3% | 100% | 96.7% | 100% | 96.8% |
Active GCA versus inactive GCA | Leave-one-patient-out | 51.7% | 46.7% | 56.7% | 51.5% | 51.9% |
Classification tasks were performed using the default configurations of the random forest classifier from the sci-kit learn library (version V.1.3.2) in Python. Classification metrics were calculated as the ratio of total correct predictions to total predictions, as defined for each metric, across each fold of cross-validation method.; PPV, ; NPV, .
GCAgiant cell arteritisNPVnegative predictive valuePPVpositive predictive value