Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 17;30(11):3184–3195. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03211-3

Table 1.

C-Lung-RADS assessment categories

C-Lung-RADS Category descriptor Findings Management Risk of malignancy Estimated population prevalence
0 Negative Calcifications Continue annual screening with LDCT in 12 months
1 Low risk

Solid nodule:

• <6 mm

Continue annual screening with LDCT in 12 months 0.3% 78.2%

Part-solid nodule (mGGN):

• <6 mm

Non-solid nodule (pGGN):

• <6 mm

2 Mid risk

Solid nodule:

• ≥6 to <10 mm

Six-month CT 3.2% 17.4%

Part-solid nodule (mGGN):

• ≥6 mm total mean diameter with solid component <6 mm

Non-solid nodule (pGGN):

• ≥6 to <20 mm

3 High risk

Solid nodule:

• ≥10 to <18 mm

Three-month CTa 6.2% 2.6%

Part-solid nodule (mGGN):

• ≥6 mm total mean diameter with solid component ≥6 to <10 mm

Non-solid nodule (pGGN):

• ≥20 mm

4 Extremely high risk

Solid nodule:

• ≥18 mm

Immediate clinical assessmentb 24.3% 1.8%

Part-solid nodule (mGGN):

• Solid component ≥10 mm

Category 2 or 3 nodules with a multidimensional model-predicted malignant probability ≥0.5

aFor label 3 nodules, high-resolution CT or PET/CT may be considered.

bFor label 4 nodules, a comprehensive clinical assessment is warranted, which may include a diagnostic chest CT with or without contrast enhancement, PET/CT scanning particularly when there is a solid nodule or solid component measuring 8 mm or larger, tissue sampling such as biopsies, and/or referral for additional clinical evaluation. The decision to proceed with these assessments should be based on a careful clinical evaluation, taking into account the patient’s preferences and the estimated likelihood of malignancy.