Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 17;30(11):3184–3195. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03211-3

Table 2.

Sensitivity, false-positive rate, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the C-Lung-RADS and Lung-RADS v2022

Variables C-Lung-RADS Lung-RADS P value
Percentage (95% CI) n/N Percentage (95% CI) n/N
Internal testing dataset
 SEN 79.9 (74.0–84.8) 167/209 60.3 (53.5–66.7) 126/209 <0.001
 FPR 8.2 (6.8–10.0) 94/1,142 5.1 (3.9–6.5) 58/1,142 0.003
 PPV 64.0 (58.0–69.6) 167/261 68.5 (61.5–74.8) 126/184 0.325
 NPV 96.1 (94.8–97.1) 1,048/1,090 92.9 (91.3–94.2) 1,084/1,167 <0.001
Independent testing dataset
 SEN 87.1 (80.5–91.7) 121/139 63.3 (55.0–70.9) 88/139 <0.001
 FPR 5.9 (4.9–7.1) 107/1,812 4.4 (3.5–5.4) 79/1,812 0.035
 PPV 53.1 (46.6–59.4) 121/228 52.7 (45.2–60.1) 88/167 0.941
 NPV 99.0 (98.4–99.3) 1,705/1,723 97.1 (96.3–97.8) 1,733/1,784 <0.001

Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square tests, with two-tailed P values presented. SEN, sensitivity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.