Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 1;44(6):1403–1416. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2024.e97

Table 6. Antibacterial efficacy of peracetic acid (Daesung) on carcasses and contaminated water.

Classification 50 ppm 100 ppm 150 ppm 200 ppm SEM p-value
Before treatment Carcasses General bacteria 5,350 5,350 5,350 5,350 13.40 0.98
Escherichia coli 925.8 925.8 925.8 925.8 18.74 0.97
Contaminated water General bacteria 3.6×108 3.6×108 3.6×108 3.6×108 1.4×107 0.97
E. coli 3.8×107 3.6×107 3.6×107 3.6×107 1.7×106 0.98
After treatment Carcasses General bacteria 1,731.5b 2,127.5b 980.5b 388.5b 415.06 0.06
E. coli 335.0b 308.5b 266.0b 98.6b 60.28 0.08
Contaminated water General bacteria 1.9×108b 1.7×108b 1.5×108ab 1.3×108a 1.71×108 <0.05
E. coli 9.7×106a 8.7×106ab 6.8×106a 6.3×106c 1.8×105 <0.05
Redution rate (%)1) Carcasses General bacteria 67.61b 60.27b 81.73b 92.70a 17.46 <0.05
E. coli 63.81c 66.76c 71.30b 89.37a 11.46 <0.05
Contaminated water General bacteria 46.57b 52.41b 58.59ab 63.52a 7.37 <0.05
E. coli 74.52b 75.76ab 81.12a 82.45a 3.92 <0.05

Each values are mean±SD of at least three repeated experiments.

1)

(Initial bacterial count – Count of bacteria after 10 min) / Initial bacterial count × 100.

a–c

Values with different letters within a row are different at p<0.05.