Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 1;44(6):1403–1416. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2024.e97

Table 7. Antibacterial efficacy of peracetic acid A on carcasses and contaminated water.

Classification 50 ppm 100 ppm 150 ppm 200 ppm SEM p-value
Before treatment Carcasses General bacteria 18,816 18,816 18,816 18,816 19.70 0.99
Escherichia coli 6,941.7 6,941.7 6,941.7 6,941.7 41.45 0.96
Contaminated water General bacteria 3.6×108 3.6×108 3.6×108 3.6×108 1.4×107 0.97
E. coli 3.8×107 3.6×107 3.6×107 3.6×107 1.7×106 0.98
After treatment Carcasses General bacteria 2,113.0b 1,110.5c 884.0b 292.0b 288.26 <0.05
E. coli 585.5ab 139.0b 122.0b 44.2b 56.98 <0.05
Contaminated water General bacteria 1.5×108b 1.3×108b 9.8×107b 9.8×107a 1.6×107 <0.05
E. coli 7.9×106a 4.3×106b 5.8×106a 2.7×106b 3.4×106 <0.05
Redution rate (%)1) Carcasses General bacteria 88.87c 94.12b 95.32b 98.46a 1.46 <0.05
E. coli 91.62bc 98.01b 98.26b 99.45b 3.53 <0.05
Contaminated water General bacteria 58.61b 64.32b 72.86a 72.85a 6.92 <0.05
E. coli 79.17c 88.06b 84.02b 92.47a 5.66 <0.05

Each values are mean±SD of at least three repeated experiments.

1)

(Initial bacterial count – Count of bacteria after 10 min) / Initial bacterial count × 100.

a–c

Values with different letters within a row are different at p<0.05.