Table 2.
Correlations for predictor, moderators, and parenting outcomes among mothers and fathers
| Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Confed Stat | — | -0.10 | -0.06 | 0.02 | -0.42** | 0.44** | 0.31** | 0.52** |
| 2. PSOC Sat | -0.10 | — | 0.48** | -0.52** | 0.39** | -0.23* | 0.20 | -0.02 |
| 3. PSOC Eff | 0.08 | 0.39** | — | -0.34** | 0.31** | -0.28** | 0.25* | -0.08 |
| 4. Child ADHD Status | 0.02 | -0.39** | -0.36** | — | − 0.25* | 0.20 | -0.03 | 0.13 |
| 5. PR Pos. Parenting | -0.55** | 0.09 | 0.11 | −0 .15 | — | − 0.80** | 0.03 | -0.27** |
| 6. PR Neg. Parenting | 0.41** | -0.03 | -0.04 | − 0.08 | − 0.65** | — | 0.03* | 0.40** |
| 7. OC Pos. Parenting | 0.35** | -0.22* | -0.08 | 0.08 | − 0.22* | 0.26* | — | 0.31** |
| 8. OC Neg. Parenting | 0.61** | -0.11 | 0.06 | -0.04 | -0.32** | 0.28** | 0.44** | — |
N = 90. Mothers’ correlations shown in the bottom left, fathers’ correlations shown in the top right
A log transformation was conducted on OC Neg. Parenting
Higher scores on the efficacy and satisfaction subscales indicate greater feelings of satisfaction and efficacy, respectively
Confederate status (1 = Disruptive and 0 = Typical). Child ADHD Status (1 = Child with ADHD and 0 = Child without ADHD). Partner-reported parenting was rated on a 10-point Likert scale (1 = not at all to 10 = completely)
PR Partner ratings of parenting behavior, OC Observer coded parenting behavior, PSOC Parenting Sense of Competence Scale, Sat. Satisfaction, Eff. Efficacy
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01