TABLE 6.

Each JPCAT‐SF components associated with good SRH (logistic analysis).

	Odds ratio	95%CI		p Value
Whole group
First contact	1.08	0.90	1.30	0.35
Longitudinality	1.11	0.92	1.33	0.25
Coordination	0.75	0.62	0.90	0.002
Comprehensiveness available	1.30	1.09	1.56	0.004
Comprehensiveness provided	0.86	0.70	1.06	0.16
Community orientation	1.26	1.05	1.51	0.01
Subgroup with chronic disease
First contact	1.25	0.96	1.63	0.08
Longitudinality	1.24	0.96	1.61	0.09
Coordination	0.88	0.68	1.13	0.33
Comprehensiveness available	1.44	1.11	1.87	0.005
Comprehensiveness provided	1.18	0.88	1.57	0.24
Community orientation	1.25	0.96	1.62	0.09
Subgroup without chronic disease
First contact	1.03	0.74	1.44	0.82
Longitudinality	1.49	1.04	2.12	0.02
Coordination	0.74	0.53	1.05	0.09
Comprehensiveness available	1.46	1.04	2.03	0.02
Comprehensiveness provided	0.70	0.48	1.02	0.07
Community orientation	1.11	0.79	1.54	0.53

Note: Each component was analyzed as whether the average was above the mean score. Adjusted for sex, age, education, marriage, employment, and income factors for each group. Each variable was categorized as follows: Male sex was used as chategorical data. Age was used in the analysis as “non‐elderly” if the age was less than 65 years old. Educational background was used in the analysis as “high educational background” if the respondent had a junior college or university degree or higher. Marital status was used in the analysis of “whether the respondent having be married or not” as a confounding factor. In the analysis, working status was defined as “not working” if the respondent was unemployed or retired. Respondents were asked to answer on a 4‐point scale their annual household income (1.5, 3, and 5 million yen), and whether the income was 3.01 million yen or more was used for the analysis. The above average JPCAT‐SF score used as an explanatory variable.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; JPCAT‐SF, Japanese Primary Care Assessment Tool Short Form.