TABLE 3.
SUCRA of different Chinese medicine decoctions for various outcomes.
| Treatment | NIHSS(%) | BI(%) | ADL (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BXBZTMT | 69.1 | 77 | 41.1 |
| BYHWT | 58.6 | 50.1 | 46.2 |
| HTTLT | 49 | 55.6 | 94.8 |
| QFHYXXTLF | 36.5 | ||
| SOC | 4.6 | 2.2 | 5.3 |
| SQTLF | 70.9 | 89.5 | |
| TLFZT | 63.4 | 41.9 | 57.6 |
| TLXFT | 41.6 | 66.4 | |
| TQHXT | 30.5 | 15.9 | |
| XFZYT | 84.3 | 85.3 | 72.4 |
| XLCQT | 21.3 | 23.7 | 30.7 |
| XXMT | 61.2 | 29.3 | 36.9 |
| YQHXT | 32.9 | 44 | |
| YQHXTLT | 55 | 85.9 | 48.6 |
| ZFJXT | 71.1 |
The redder the data, the higher the ranking of the drug in the outcome indicator.