Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 28;11:1439110. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1439110

Table 6.

Effects of different formula treatments on intestinal morphology in LBW suckling piglets.

Item Group1 P-value
BF SF HF
Duodenum
Villus height, μm 252.8 ± 9.12 235.19 ± 7.1 236.13 ± 6.43 0.191
Crypt depth, μm 90.77 ± 3.56 93.21 ± 3.74 90.11 ± 3.34 0.807
Villus height/Crypt depth 2.96 ± 0.15 2.7 ± 0.13 2.74 ± 0.09 0.268
Jejunum
Villus height, μm 258.09 ± 5.67 251.29 ± 9.06 248 ± 7.56 0.634
Crypt depth, μm 84.22 ± 2.32b 71.49 ± 3.13a 75.49 ± 2.04a 0.002
Villus height/Crypt depth 3.2 ± 0.12a 3.8 ± 0.18b 3.37 ± 0.12a 0.012
Ileum
Villus height, μm 206.47 ± 12.54 218.99 ± 10.67 213.05 ± 6.89 0.692
Crypt depth, μm 81.32 ± 1.83b 77.87 ± 2.82ab 71.85 ± 2.96a 0.035
Villus height/Crypt depth 2.61 ± 0.17a 2.94 ± 0.15ab 3.24 ± 0.2b 0.041
1

BF, basal infant formula; SF, standard premature infant formula; HF, hydrolyzed protein formula.

Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 8). Means within a row with different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05).