Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 15;22:534. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03749-6

Table 2.

Association between patients with different glycaemic status at baseline or time-dependent diabetes during follow-up and risk of subsequent multimorbidity cluster of cardiovascular disease and cancera

Variable Cases/person-years Incidence per 1000 person-years Crude hazard ratio 95% confidence interval P value Adjusted hazard ratio 95% confidence interval P value
Model 1
 Normal glucose tolerance 18/14,394 1.25 (0.67–1.83) Reference Reference
 Impaired glucose tolerance 45/14,174 3.17 (2.25–4.10) 2.7 1.60–4.78  < 0.001 3.28 1.83–5.87  < 0.001
 Newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes 41/12,686 3.23 (2.24–4.22) 3.56 2.04–6.21  < 0.001 3.90 2.14–7.09  < 0.001
Model 2
 Diabetes status (time-dependent)
Non-diabetes status 14/10,144 1.38 (0.66–2.10) Reference Reference
Diabetes status 90/31,110 2.89 (2.30–3.49) 2.37 1.46–3.83  < 0.001 2.55 1.51–4.31  < 0.001

Adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, obesity status, hypertension status, hypoglycaemic drugs, lipid-lowering drugs, and antihypertensive drugs

aAdditional model analysis which took IGT as reference group showed that the risk of multimorbidity cluster of CVD and cancer in diabetes group was not different with IGT group (HR = 1.21, 95% CI 0.78–1.87, P = 0.40) after a same adjustment