Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 15;24:813. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06243-8

Table 2.

Mean instruments differences between part 1 and part 2

Part 1 Part 2 Mean differences
n = 242 n = 61
M SD M SD t p
Practitioners’ attitudes
SETSP-S 45.50 6.75 46.63 4.67 3.88 0.000
CATSP 3.91 1.03 3.84 1.02 1.88 0.065
CATSP_EI 4.48 1.30 4.50 1.33 1.56 0.124
CATSP_LC 4.19 1.06 4.20 1.13 0.49 0.624
CATSP_LT 3.63 1.20 3.40 1.11 -3.21 0.002
CATSP_CE 4.19 1.06 3.27 1.17 1.13 0.262
CBI 46.94 10.88 48.48 10.08 − 0.40 0.690
CBI_CLIENTS 14.41 3.95 15.14 3.24 1.64 0.108
CBI_WORK 18.08 4.12 18.52 3.935 0.41 0.684
CBI_PERSONAL 14.45 3.88 14.82 3.89 0.09 0.928
BAQ 66.54 5.23 66.39 5.91 0.18 0.860
BAQ_CONFIDENCE 3.92 0.44 4.02 0.47 -1.53 0.002
BAQ_MOTIVATION 4.46 0.33 4.32 0.36 2.66 0.076
DBT experience
Implementation of DBT treatment modes 1.57 1.72 3.19 0.97 8.58 0.000
No. patients treated with DBT 3.75 7.48 7.46 11.3 -0.99 0.33
No. DBT skills groups conducted 0.65 1.85 1.02 1.64 0.34 0.74
No. hours consultation team meetings 18.01 49.12 32.78 47.45 2.92 0.008
No. DBT team members 2.51 3.81 5.43 2.37 2.51 0.021
No. hours mindfulness practice 2.57 2.62 2.69 2.21 -1.20 0.240

Note: In bold = p < .05; SETSP-S: Efficacy in Assessing and Managing Suicide Risk scale, CBI: Copenhagen Burnout Inventory; CATSP: Concerns About Treating Suicidal Clients Scale; EI: Emotional Impact Subscale; L: Legal Consequences subscale; LT: Lack of training and competence subscale; CE: Clinical Errors Subscale; BAQ: Behavioral Anticipation and Confidence Questionnaire