Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 22;10(21):e39698. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39698

Table 5.

Factors affecting the prognosis/treatment outcomes of MM.

Factors affecting treatment outcomes Regimen Treatment outcome/prognosis Reference
Patients with IGH deletion + ve Bortezomib and/or thalidomide-based chemotherapy Patients with deletion showed improved ORR to PAD induction therapy. [42]
Higher decorin∗ levels in bone marrow plasma Chemo-based: VAD, MP; novel agents-based: BTD, BTD and cyclophosphamide H-DCN was linked to improved treatment results and a longer PFS. [70]
Cytogenetic abnormalities in MM Bortezomib and non-bortezomib group Del (17p), t(4; 14), and 1q21 gain are all independent risk factors for MM patients. Patients with these anomalies are more likely to relapse early. [87]
TNF promoter polymorphisms Thalidomide and dexamethasone TNF-alpha238 GA + AA genotypes were significantly linked with improved PFS and OS. [29]
Heterogeneous chromosome 12p deletion Thalidomide and bortezomib groups Patients with the deletion had a low survival rate when treated with either bortezomib or thalidomide. [74]
PHD finger protein 19/PHF 19 (also known as polycomb‐like protein 3 [PCL3]) expression in multiple myeloma BDT, BD, Allo-HSCT Increased PHF19 expression is linked with poor induction therapy response and a negative prognosis of MM. [88]
Pre-treatment neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio Conventional and bortezomib-based chemotherapy Increased NLR is a poor predictive factor in elderly patients and the advanced stages of MM. [89]
Early monoclonal protein decline pattern Regular bortezomib-based chemotherapy followed by ASCT Those with pattern B showed greater PFS and OS than patients with pattern A or C. [90]
CTLA-4 polymorphisms PAD, VCD, VTD CTLA-4 rs733618 GG decreased PFS and OS in MM patients. [91]
The effect of type 2 diabetes on the survival of MM patients Chemotherapy/VAD/thalidomide/bortezomib/HDT and HSCT/bisphosphonates Pre-existing diabetes – higher mortality risk when compared to non-diabetic peers. [92]
RI in MM patients
  • (1)

    Bortezomib-containing regimens

  • (2)

    Novel agent-based regimen followed by ASCT

  • (3) (4)

    BCMA (CAR)-T cell therapyBortezomib in combination with dexamethasone

  • (5)

    Lenalidomide with low-dose dexamethasone

  • (1)

    Prognosis was better in the bortezomib groups than the non-bortezomib groups.

  • (2)

    Severe RI-adverse prognostic factor for survival in NDMM. In individuals with severe RI, bortezomib-based regimens may be the preferable treatment.

  • (3)

    CAR-T-cell therapy used to treat R/RMM may improve renal function.

  • (4)

    Bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone is a safe and efficient treatment for NDMM (with RI).

  • (5)

    Patients with no/mild RI had a longer PFS and OS compared to those with moderate or severe RI.

[40,75]
[48]
[93]
[94]
[83]
Hypercalcemia Bortezomib or the thalidomide-based induction followed by ASCT on two groups (patients with hypercalcemia and patients without hypercalcemia) The OS was double-fold in the non-hypercalcemia patients compared to the patients with hypercalcemia. [95]
Elevated LDH Bortezomib-based induction and ASCT regimen A poor prognostic factor for MM [96]
Presence of EMD
  • (1)

    Bortezomib and thalidomide groups

  • (2)

    A 3-weekly daratumumab regimen in R/RMM followed by ASCT

  • (3)

    Humanized BCMA (CAR)-T cell therapy in R/RMM

  • (4)

    Glutathione combined with mecobalamin to treat PN in MM

  • (5)

    Bortezomib treatment in light-chain MM

  • (1)

    EMD has a poorer outcome and CR is higher in the bortezomib-containing regimen.

  • (2)

    Information on EMD is unavailable.

  • (3)

    CRS and ICANS were significantly greater in EMD patients. Patients with EMD have a poor prognosis.

  • (4)

    Mortality risk of MM patients with EMD

  • (2.373) was greater than that of non-EMD MM patients.

  • (5)

    EMD was more common among the light-chain MM compared to other subtypes.

[73]
[34]
[61,84,85]
[97]
[68]

Allo-HSCT: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; ASCT: Autologous stem cell transplantation; BDT: bortezomib–dexamethasone–thalidomide; BCMA: Anti-B-cell maturation antigen; BD: bortezomib–dexamethasone; BTD: Bortezomib–dexamethasone with thalidomide; CAR: Chimeric antigen receptor; CR: Complete response; CRS: Cytokine release syndrome; Cy: Cyclophosphamide; CTLA-4: Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4; DM: Diabetes mellitus; EMD: Extramedullary disease; H-DCN: High decorin; HDT: High-dose therapy; HSCT: Hematopoietic stem cell therapy; ICANS: Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxic syndrome; IGH: Immunoglobulin heavy chain gene; MM: Multiple myeloma; MP: Melphalan and prednisolone; NDMM: Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma; NLR: Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio; OS: Overall survival; PAD: Bortezomib–doxorubicin–dexamethasone; PFS: Progression-free survival; PN: Peripheral neuropathy; RI: Renal impairment; R/RMM: Relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma; TNF: Tumor necrosis factor; VAD: Vincristine–doxorubicin–dexamethasone.

∗ It is the only instance, where decorin is mentioned in the review. We have presented the findings from a study (included in this review) which compared decorin with other treatment regimens.