Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 16;36(1):46–53. doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_18_24

Table 6.

Performance of BAD-D, corvis biomechanical index, and tomographic biomechanical index

Score Accuracy AUC Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV
AI model 1 test set (n=167)
 BAD-D
  Weighted average 0.912 0.904 85.6 95.3 0.893
  Macro average 0.892 0.865 79.9 93.1 0.744
AI model 2–3 test set (n=62)
 BAD-D
  Weighted average 0.951 0.988 91.4 98.0 0.938
  Macro average 0.935 0.956 86.3 96.2 0.778
 CBI
  Weighted average 0.798 0.988 80.1 78.5 0.727
  Macro average 0.839 0.956 55.6 86.2 0.533
 TBI
  Weighted average 0.951 0.988 91.4 98.0 0.938
  Macro average 0.935 0.956 86.3 96.2 0.778

BAD-D: Belin-Ambrósio enhanced ectasia total deviation display, CBI: Corvis biomechanical index, TBI: Tomography and biomechanical index, n: Number of images, AUC: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, PPV: Positive predictive value, AI: Artificial intelligence