Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 15;26:159. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01913-7

Table 1.

Associations between each pollutant and breast cancer risk

NO2 BaP PCB153
Cases/Controls OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Continuous (For each 1SD increase) 523/523 1.04 (0.81, 1.34) 1.04 (0.81, 1.34) 1.30 (0.98, 1.73)
Quartiles
I 121/131 1 (ref) 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
II 134/131 1.11 (0.74, 1.66) 1.58 (0.96, 2.61) 1.19 (0.68, 2.06)
III 132/130 1.14 (0.71, 1.83) 2.03 (1.05, 3.93) 2.25 (1.13, 4.57)
IV 136/131 1.18 (0.66, 2.11) 2.32 (1.00, 5.37) 2.07 (0.93, 4.61)

Conditional logistic regression models were used for estimating ORs and 95%CI, adjusted for body mass index, menopausal hormone replacement therapy uses, urban/rural status at birth, urban/rural status at inclusion, alcohol drinking, breastfeeding, mammography before inclusion, oral contraceptive use, age at full-term pregnancy and parity, smoking status, total physical activity.

The ORs (95% CI) correspond to an increment of 1 SD level in controls, NO2: 17.0 μg/m3, PCB153: 3.92 ng/m3, BaP: 0.126 ng/m3

Quartiles’ cut-offs for NO2 based on the distribution among controls: ≤ 24.2, ≤ 32.4, ≤ 46.5 µg/m3

Quartiles’ cut-offs for PCB153 based on the distribution among controls: ≤ 8.13, ≤ 10.12, ≤ 12.91 ng/m3

Quartiles’ cut-offs for BaP based on the distribution among controls: ≤ 0.133, ≤ 0.179, ≤ 0.240 ng/m3

SD Standard deviation, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence intervals, NO2 nitrogen dioxide, BaP: benzo[a]pyrene, PCB153: polychlorinated biphenyls