. 2024 Aug 13;76(6):5195–5200. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04942-y

Table 4.

Relation between SSD and adenoid size in group 1

Item	Group A (Adenoid size < 50%)	Group B (Adenoid size > 50%)	P-value
-Omission -Distortion - Substitution	38(63.3%) 22(36.7%) 52(100%)	16(61.5%) 10(38.5%) 92(100%)	P = 0.587n.s
1-Devoicing 4-Gliding 5-Back to front 6-Interdental sigmatism 2-Lateral Sigmatism 3-Pharyngeal Sigmatism	16(30.8%) 14(26.9%) 6(11.5%) 26(50.0%) 10(19.2%) 4(7.7%)	38(41.3%) 34(37.0%) 10(10.9%) 52(56.5%) 8(8.7%) --	P = 0.265n.s P = 0.274n.s P = 0.608n.s P = 0.176n.s P = 0.176n.s P = 0.127n.s

Item

Group A
(Adenoid size < 50%)

Group B
(Adenoid size
> 50%)

P-value

-Omission

-Distortion

- Substitution

38(63.3%)

22(36.7%)

52(100%)

16(61.5%)

10(38.5%)

92(100%)

P = 0.587n.s

1-Devoicing

4-Gliding

5-Back to front

6-Interdental sigmatism

2-Lateral Sigmatism

3-Pharyngeal Sigmatism

16(30.8%)

14(26.9%)

6(11.5%)

26(50.0%)

10(19.2%)

4(7.7%)

38(41.3%)

34(37.0%)

10(10.9%)

52(56.5%)

8(8.7%)

P = 0.265n.s

P = 0.274n.s

P = 0.608n.s

P = 0.176n.s

P = 0.127n.s

Data expressed as number and percentage Using Chi-test in numeric data. To comparison between subjects & control groups. ^n.s p-value non significant.