Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 17.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Dec 22;37(7):1479–1497. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2022.2157885

Table 8.

Mean within-subject difference in error rate for phonological fluency and category switching, compared to category fluency.

Parkinson’s Disease (PD) (N = 63) Essential Tremor (ET) (N = 53)
Ma 95% CI P value Ma 95% CI P value
Phonological fluency
  Total errors 2.6 [1.0, 4.3] .002 2.5 [0.8, 4.3] .006
  Perseveration errors 1.6 [0.6, 2.6] .003 1.1 [−0.4, 2.5] .14
  Set-loss errors 1.0 [−0.1, 2.2] .08 1.5 [0.2, 2.7] .02
Category switching
  Total errors 5.1 [2.6, 7.7] <.001 3.9 [1.4, 6.4] .003
  Perseveration errors 1.0 [−0.5, 2.4] .18 0.3 [−1.3, 1.8] .74
  Set-loss errors 4.1 [2.4, 5.9] <.001 3.9 [2.2, 5.7] <.001

Note. PD = Parkinson’s disease; ET = Essential Tremor; M = mean difference; CI = confidence interval.

a

M represents the mean within-patient difference in error percentage compared to category fluency. Null hypothesis of “mean difference equals zero” was investigated using paired t tests.

Signifiant levels are bolded.